Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The J6'rs that were let go last night immediately took over the canal! Great victory!

Rumor is Greenland is tomorrow and Canada is over the weekend! Our Nazi regime is coming together! Nothing can stop us now!

Heil Trump!

Heil Trump!

Heil Trump!

 

Screw it. If they are going to believe it any way, might as well lean into it. They ain't going to believe the truth anyway.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

The J6'rs that were let go last night immediately took over the canal! Great victory!

Rumor is Greenland is tomorrow and Canada is over the weekend! Our Nazi regime is coming together! Nothing can stop us now!

Heil Trump!

Heil Trump!

Heil Trump!

 

Screw it. If they are going to believe it any way, might as well lean into it. They ain't going to believe the truth anyway.

America took over the Panama canal last night?

Citation please?

Edited by Nationalist
  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

America took over the Panama canal last night?

Citation please?

I'm absolutely dumbfounded.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
9 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I'm absolutely dumbfounded.

So you were kidding? Man I just got up.

  • Haha 2

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

So you were kidding? Man I just got up.

Yeah. It was a sarcastic, lefty inspired, fairytale

 

 

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
8 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Yeah. It was a sarcastic, lefty inspired, fairytale

 

 

Jesus...guess I should have a coffee before reading from now on.

  • Haha 2

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

The J6'rs that were let go last night immediately took over the canal! Great victory!

Rumor is Greenland is tomorrow and Canada is over the weekend! Our Nazi regime is coming together! Nothing can stop us now!

Heil Trump!

Heil Trump!

Heil Trump!

 

Screw it. If they are going to believe it any way, might as well lean into it. They ain't going to believe the truth anyway.

You wouldn't know "the truth" if you wandered into a reputable news source by accident.

The truth is the Trump is publicly on record as considering the use of military force to seize the Panama canal. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

The J6'rs that were let go last night immediately took over the canal! Great victory!

Rumor is Greenland is tomorrow and Canada is over the weekend! Our Nazi regime is coming together! Nothing can stop us now!

Heil Trump!

Heil Trump!

Heil Trump!

Screw it. If they are going to believe it any way, might as well lean into it. They ain't going to believe the truth anyway.

lol thing is we know this is who you are, you don't have to pretend it's a troll.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

lol thing is we know this is who you are, you don't have to pretend it's a troll.

Thank you. It is always appreciated when you take the time and go out of your way to prove me correct even though we disagree on so many things. That is so thoughtful of you.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Hangover is what happens when YOU go to bed DRUNK. LMAO

No hangover robo. Stop being a silly twit.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
Just now, Nationalist said:

No hangover robo. Stop being a silly twit.

He doesn't have anything else.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Thank you. It is always appreciated when you take the time and go out of your way to prove me correct even though we disagree on so many things. That is so thoughtful of you.

Except your joke persona and your regular persona aren't really any different at the end of the day.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No hangover robo. Stop being a silly twit.

Nothing silly about calling out your huge blunder. I will stop calling them out when you stop posting them.

Even a child would understand the sarcasm IF they took the time to read the whole thing.

But you get your only exercise from jumping to conclusions. LMAO

  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Except your joke persona and your regular persona aren't really any different at the end of the day.

That's because you use emotions to control your thoughts. I make you mad. Nazis make you mad. So you see me and Nazis as the same thing.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
Just now, gatomontes99 said:

That's because you use emotions to control your thoughts. I make you mad. Nazis make you mad. So you see me and Nazis as the same thing.

You're a MAGAtard, the most irrational, emotionally fragile people alive lol. Your entire worldview is based on rage and grievance, everything flows from that. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You're a MAGAtard, the most irrational, emotionally fragile people alive lol. Your entire worldview is based on rage and grievance, everything flows from that. 

I'm curious, why do you impose those motivations on us?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I'm curious, why do you impose those motivations on us?

I'm not imposing anything, it's right from the horse's mouth.

 

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
44 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I'm not imposing anything, it's right from the horse's mouth.

 

Prove it.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Prove it.

lol every Trump speech and every Trump rally is just a litany of grievances and anger directed at immigrants, trans people, "the left"/liberals and his enemies. Just look at this board and the excitement and glee you and your fellow MAGAtards have expressed over the prospect of getting revenge for all the slights you've imagined over the last four years. It's the entire brand.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Hodad said:

The truth is the Trump is publicly on record as considering the use of military force to seize the Panama canal. 

Beyond a passing comment that he was not ruling out force... sure. 

Wait until you hear about how our Ballasitc Missile submarines are prepared to target any place on Earth with Nuclear weapons. 

 

 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

lol every Trump speech and every Trump rally is just a litany of grievances and anger directed at immigrants, trans people, "the left"/liberals and his enemies. Just look at this board and the excitement and glee you and your fellow MAGAtards have expressed over the prospect of getting revenge for all the slights you've imagined over the last four years. It's the entire brand.

 

Yeah. Prove it. Don't just keep making blanket statements without some supporting evidence.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
6 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Yeah. Prove it. Don't just keep making blanket statements without some supporting evidence.

Oh I'm sorry I didn't know you were in a coma for the last 8 years.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Oh I'm sorry I didn't know you were in a coma for the last 8 years.

Blanket statements can be met with blanket statements. I'm just asking you to give me supporting evidence of your thesis. But I can just as easily say: "You are mischaracterizing the movement." Then what? I can't prove a negative so you will have to start with proving your point or not. But if you can't prove your point, doesn't that prove mine?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
8 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Blanket statements can be met with blanket statements. I'm just asking you to give me supporting evidence of your thesis. But I can just as easily say: "You are mischaracterizing the movement." Then what? I can't prove a negative so you will have to start with proving your point or not. But if you can't prove your point, doesn't that prove mine?

You and I both know there's no evidence I could provide that you will find convincing or that won't be dismissed out of hand, so why bother engaging in the charade?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...