Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
27 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

do you notice something? There is nothing political about the article YET.

in fairness, when Christians are attacked, one would suspect left wing ideological violence as a motivating factor

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

In fairness... you should wait until you have actual information but I know that is too much to ask. 

the Democrat party traitors to the republic are ever inciting hatred & violence against Christians

now that they have become the Hamas party, they incite hatred & violence against Jews as well

pardon me for noticing

Posted
Just now, Dougie93 said:

the Democrat party traitors to the republic are ever inciting hatred & violence against Christians

now that they have become the Hamas party, they incite hatred & violence against Jews as well

pardon me for noticing

in short, you have nothing to back this up. I prefer to actually have information to back up my assertions. I know that we differ on that front. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

in fairness, when Christians are attacked, one would suspect left wing ideological violence as a motivating factor

 

8 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

In fairness... you should wait until you have actual information but I know that is too much to ask. 

What we can assume is that the shooter didn't not respect life and most likely had some sort of mental health or mental break episode prior to today.

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Politics1990 said:

another sad day in america they really need to  pass some legialation  or do something to end this no other country has school shooting as often   like them.

Like what? Should we tell people that have never and most likely will never violate any laws by using a gun that they can't own a gun because someone else might?

Maybe we should ban tvs and cars so they won't get stolen while we are at it. After all, if there are no tvs or cars, then no one can break the law by stealing them.

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

Like what? Should we tell people that have never and most likely will never violate any laws by using a gun that they can't own a gun because someone else might?

Maybe we should ban tvs and cars so they won't get stolen while we are at it. After all, if there are no tvs or cars, then no one can break the law by stealing them.

not sure what you do but there is enough smart minds i am sure they could come up with something its the only country with the problem  happening so often.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

in short, you have nothing to back this up. I prefer to actually have information to back up my assertions. I know that we differ on that front. 

I have made no assertions

I merely suspect that an attack against Christians will be left wing political violence in the end

bearing in mind also how the left wing media would twist itself into knots to deny the truth of it

thus any "information" emanating from those sources is suspect in of itself

Posted
7 minutes ago, Politics1990 said:

not sure what you do but there is enough smart minds i am sure they could come up with something its the only country with the problem  happening so often.

The problem is so bad that you have roughly the same chance of death by school shooting as you do death by lightning.

https://www.cdc.gov/lightning/data-research/index.html

https://www.edweek.org/leadership/school-shootings-this-year-how-many-and-where/2024/01

 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

The problem is so bad that you have roughly the same chance of death by school shooting as you do death by lightning.

in 2022, 34 children were killed in school shootings

while 1,129 were killed in car accidents

Posted
57 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Like what? Should we tell people that have never and most likely will never violate any laws by using a gun that they can't own a gun because someone else might?

according to reports,  the school shooter was a child, student at the school

and the weapon was a 9x19mm pistol

so there was no legal way for the child to possess the firearm

and the firearm itself is not an Assault Weapon

Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

The problem is so bad that you have roughly the same chance of death by school shooting as you do death by lightning.

https://www.cdc.gov/lightning/data-research/index.html

https://www.edweek.org/leadership/school-shootings-this-year-how-many-and-where/2024/01

 

Humans don't cause lightning.  All you are saying is the body count is acceptable.

Edited by Aristides
Posted
59 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I have made no assertions

I merely suspect that an attack against Christians will be left wing political violence in the end

bearing in mind also how the left wing media would twist itself into knots to deny the truth of it

thus any "information" emanating from those sources is suspect in of itself

"suspect".. this is another way of saying that you are biased and can't be relied on to be objective. No matter who the shooter is.. you will contend that they were a leftist. You would have been 100 % wrong in the case of the Las Vegas Shooter. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Humans don't cause lightning.  All you are saying is the body count is acceptable.

But lightning is an extremely low risk. What I'm saying is that the danger is overblown. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

according to reports,  the school shooter was a child, student at the school

and the weapon was a 9x19mm pistol

so there was no legal way for the child to possess the firearm

and the firearm itself is not an Assault Weapon

I mean, my spatula can be an assault weapon. It auto reloads, it never runs out of ammo and it is easy to conceal.

Just now, Aristides said:

Ya, the body count is acceptable. 

So what should we do? Punish people that followed the law? Is that acceptable? What level of government control is unacceptable to you?

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted

You aren't willing to do anything about it so obviously the body count is acceptable. School kids should have the freedom not to be gunned down in schools just so any Bubba can have his AR. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

"suspect".. this is another way of saying that you are biased and can't be relied on to be objective. No matter who the shooter is.. you will contend that they were a leftist. You would have been 100 % wrong in the case of the Las Vegas Shooter. 

I am not objective

I am entirely subjective in the face of Democrat party traitors to the republic

and their speech banning gun grabbing Christian hating tyranny

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...