Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
29 minutes ago, Politics1990 said:

fake news

Testimony, under oath, is fake news? But I suppose an anonymous source is to be trusted and unquestionable?

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 hours ago, West said:

 

 

Another conspiracy theory becomes a conspiracy reality

Sure. And they FORCED Trump to demand changes to the vote count with threats of prosecution on a recorded call.

You are such a DUPE. And you have no idea how ridiculous you appear. LMAO

Posted
12 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Sure. And they FORCED Trump to demand changes to the vote count with threats of prosecution on a recorded call.

That is not anywhere near what Trump did or said. 

 

 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, robosmith said:

Sure. And they FORCED Trump to demand changes to the vote count with threats of prosecution on a recorded call.

You are such a DUPE. And you have no idea how ridiculous you appear. LMAO

No link? It's just your opinion you liar.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

Looks like it's legit

Nathan Wade, special prosecutor in Georgia's case against Donald Trump, met with Biden officials - Washington Times

Well that's kind of a big deal.

This has been handled so poorly. There are so many red flags that even if everything they have done is completely innocent and they are following the law the public will still look at it and say it's complete bullshit. There is no way to make this look legitimate anymore.

In their desperate haste to try and convict trump of not only anything but rather everything, any legitimate charges or issues that he should have been held to account for if any are now completely in the garbage can

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
16 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Testimony, under oath, is fake news? But I suppose an anonymous source is to be trusted and unquestionable?

I should have said "self incriminating testimony, under oath..."

33 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Looks like it's legit

Nathan Wade, special prosecutor in Georgia's case against Donald Trump, met with Biden officials - Washington Times

Well that's kind of a big deal.

This has been handled so poorly. There are so many red flags that even if everything they have done is completely innocent and they are following the law the public will still look at it and say it's complete bullshit. There is no way to make this look legitimate anymore.

In their desperate haste to try and convict trump of not only anything but rather everything, any legitimate charges or issues that he should have been held to account for if any are now completely in the garbage can

How weird is it that the left won't believe the self incriminating testimony of a prosecutor that was so trust worthy that we should believe him in his banana republic style persecution of Trump and his associates?

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...