gatomontes99 Posted November 13, 2024 Report Posted November 13, 2024 Is there any better example of the DOJ interference in politics than Mayor Adams. When illegal immigration got bad and Texas started shipping immigrants to NYC, he said illegal immigration will destroy NYC. Then he got called to DC and on the flight down there, his campaign manager's house got raided. When he got back to NYC, he's talking about how they will welcome and care for the illegal immigrants. Then, when it became evident Trump would win, he went right back to the truth. Illegal immigration was and is destroying NYC. His actions show that the Biden DOJ was using lawfare on Mayor Adams to silence him when he spoke the truth about the harmful effects of illegal immigration. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted November 13, 2024 Report Posted November 13, 2024 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Is there any better example of the DOJ interference in politics than Mayor Adams. When illegal immigration got bad and Texas started shipping immigrants to NYC, he said illegal immigration will destroy NYC. Then he got called to DC and on the flight down there, his campaign manager's house got raided. When he got back to NYC, he's talking about how they will welcome and care for the illegal immigrants. Then, when it became evident Trump would win, he went right back to the truth. Illegal immigration was and is destroying NYC. His actions show that the Biden DOJ was using lawfare on Mayor Adams to silence him when he spoke the truth about the harmful effects of illegal immigration. It's cute that you guys learned a new word, but calling everything related to legal accountability "lawfare" sort of dilutes the meaning of the word to nothing. Adams (and those in his closest orbit) have been indicted because it's become increasingly obvious that they were breaking laws--and for self-serving purposes. Just run-of-the-mill corruption. Nothing on the level of trying to trade military aid for campaign favors. At some point the "party of personal responsibility" has become absolute allergic to basic accountability. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted November 13, 2024 Author Report Posted November 13, 2024 1 hour ago, Hodad said: It's cute that you guys learned a new word, but calling everything related to legal accountability "lawfare" sort of dilutes the meaning of the word to nothing. Adams (and those in his closest orbit) have been indicted because it's become increasingly obvious that they were breaking laws--and for self-serving purposes. Just run-of-the-mill corruption. Nothing on the level of trying to trade military aid for campaign favors. At some point the "party of personal responsibility" has become absolute allergic to basic accountability. Yeah, we are also the party of law and order. But law and order doesnt mean show me the man and I'll show you the crime. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted November 13, 2024 Report Posted November 13, 2024 (edited) 51 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Yeah, we are also the party of law and order. But law and order doesnt mean show me the man and I'll show you the crime. The implication of that statement is that the laws are being misapplied. They aren't. We just have elected officials who are breaking the law. And it shows up in obvious ways, in which it would be an abdication of responsibility to not investigate and prosecute. These people aren't being targeted because they are elected officials. They're doing the same things that get many corrupt people in trouble. They just also happen to be elected officials. This is my local news. We've watched it unfold since shortly after he was elected. The New Yorker: The Most Obvious Scandal in the History of New York City Edited November 13, 2024 by Hodad Quote
Deluge Posted November 13, 2024 Report Posted November 13, 2024 2 hours ago, Hodad said: It's cute that you guys learned a new word, but calling everything related to legal accountability "lawfare" sort of dilutes the meaning of the word to nothing. Adams (and those in his closest orbit) have been indicted because it's become increasingly obvious that they were breaking laws--and for self-serving purposes. Just run-of-the-mill corruption. Nothing on the level of trying to trade military aid for campaign favors. At some point the "party of personal responsibility" has become absolute allergic to basic accountability. What's even more cute is you guys pretending that illegal immigration doesn't exist. lol "Lawfare" is very much alive and it's being used to this very day. For example, NY's AG made her campaign about Donald Trump - how she was going to GET Donald Trump - she practically shouted it on the rooftops. Now how in the hell is ANYONE supposed to believe that a fat piece of shit will bring justice when the man hasn't even been convicted yet? Our side gets it wrong from time to time, but your side nearly ALWAYS gets it wrong. The Republican party is ALWAYS the lesser of two evils. 2 Quote
Nationalist Posted November 13, 2024 Report Posted November 13, 2024 18 minutes ago, Hodad said: The implication of that statement is that the laws are being misapplied. Oh yes they are. But don't worry. Trump will be POTUS and clean house. Enjoy. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted November 13, 2024 Report Posted November 13, 2024 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Oh yes they are. But don't worry. Trump will be POTUS and clean house. Enjoy. Trump is corrupt to the core. He's not going to "clean" anything. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted November 13, 2024 Author Report Posted November 13, 2024 2 hours ago, Hodad said: The implication of that statement is that the laws are being misapplied. They aren't. We just have elected officials who are breaking the law. And it shows up in obvious ways, in which it would be an abdication of responsibility to not investigate and prosecute. These people aren't being targeted because they are elected officials. They're doing the same things that get many corrupt people in trouble. They just also happen to be elected officials. This is my local news. We've watched it unfold since shortly after he was elected. The New Yorker: The Most Obvious Scandal in the History of New York City Oh please. The NYAG campaigned convicting Trump. She didn't have a crime. She had to make up crimes, stack charges and absolutely bastardize the process. Even the ultra left wing judge is considering dropping the charges. The SCOTUS called all the election and documents charges B.S. and Jack Smith still tried to find a way around. Just get over it. You guys were and are the party of authoritarian/banana republic b.s. and you always will be. And that's why you got your aşş kicked. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted November 14, 2024 Report Posted November 14, 2024 6 hours ago, Hodad said: It's cute that you guys learned a new word, but calling everything related to legal accountability "lawfare" sort of dilutes the meaning of the word to nothing. Adams (and those in his closest orbit) have been indicted because it's become increasingly obvious that they were breaking laws--and for self-serving purposes. Just run-of-the-mill corruption. Nothing on the level of trying to trade military aid for campaign favors. At some point the "party of personal responsibility" has become absolute allergic to basic accountability. This from the people that claim math is racist Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Hodad Posted November 14, 2024 Report Posted November 14, 2024 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Oh please. The NYAG campaigned convicting Trump. She didn't have a crime. She had to make up crimes, stack charges and absolutely bastardize the process. Even the ultra left wing judge is considering dropping the charges. The SCOTUS called all the election and documents charges B.S. and Jack Smith still tried to find a way around. Just get over it. You guys were and are the party of authoritarian/banana republic b.s. and you always will be. And that's why you got your aşş kicked. And now your just making things up. Sorry, the courts didn't exist on Twitter. There are actual court records. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted November 14, 2024 Author Report Posted November 14, 2024 24 minutes ago, Hodad said: And now your just making things up. Sorry, the courts didn't exist on Twitter. There are actual court records. “There are an awful lot of dots here which it takes a bit of imagination to connect,” said Richard Klein, a Touro Law Center criminal law professor. Bragg said the indictment doesn’t specify the potential underlying crimes because the law doesn’t require it. But given the likelihood of Trump’s lawyers challenging it, “you’d think they’d want to be on much firmer ground than some of this stuff,” said Klein, a former New York City public defender. Judge Merchan Postpones Ruling on Whether to Dismiss Trump Guilty Verdict Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted November 14, 2024 Report Posted November 14, 2024 24 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: “There are an awful lot of dots here which it takes a bit of imagination to connect,” said Richard Klein, a Touro Law Center criminal law professor. Bragg said the indictment doesn’t specify the potential underlying crimes because the law doesn’t require it. But given the likelihood of Trump’s lawyers challenging it, “you’d think they’d want to be on much firmer ground than some of this stuff,” said Klein, a former New York City public defender. Judge Merchan Postpones Ruling on Whether to Dismiss Trump Guilty Verdict So, you acknowledge that you're making shit up, or you didn't read the articles? 1. The criminal case has nothing to do with the NYSAG. James is not involved and you're spinning pure, ignorant fiction. 2. The charges can't be dropper. The trial is over. Trump's lawyers are arguing now that being a felon, and any potential sentence, is just too inconvenient for POTUS. Has nothing to do with the merit of the case. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.