Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Deluge said:

"Is it time to torch the Constitution?"

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/09/30/constitution-book-reviews-chemerinsky-pierson-schickler

No, you sick f*cks, it is never time to torch the Constitution, but it very damn well might be time to torch your citizenships. ;) 

Did you read the article or just the headline? Interestingly, it’s mostly conservatives who have been calling for a second constitutional convention, not liberals. 

Edited by Rebound

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
12 hours ago, Deluge said:

"Is it time to torch the Constitution?"

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/09/30/constitution-book-reviews-chemerinsky-pierson-schickler

No, you sick f*cks, it is never time to torch the Constitution, but it very damn well might be time to torch your citizenships. ;) 

Erwin is a tweenkie.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Did you read the article or just the headline? Interestingly, it’s mostly conservatives who have been calling for a second constitutional convention, not liberals. 

For clarification only. And clearly that's because you perverts have been trying to bend and twist the constitution to fit your agenda. 

Posted
8 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're so stupid you don't understand what you advocate ^here IS TORCHING THE CONSTITUTION. 

I advocate for the constitution and the clarification of it. YOU advocate for whatever crybaby issue stains your diapers each morning. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I advocate for the constitution and the clarification of it. YOU advocate for whatever crybaby issue stains your diapers each morning. 

No, you do not. 

The “clarifications” we’ve gotten out of the Supreme Court are repulsive. “Clarifying” that the President can break any law and commit any crime he wants is an absurd “clarification.”

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
42 minutes ago, Rebound said:

No, you do not. 

The “clarifications” we’ve gotten out of the Supreme Court are repulsive. “Clarifying” that the President can break any law and commit any crime he wants is an absurd “clarification.”

Maybe you perverts shouldn't have weaponized the legal system to burn down your political opponent. 

Don't light a match if you can't handle the fire. ;) 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...