gatomontes99 Posted September 2, 2024 Report Posted September 2, 2024 What? How can you be the change candidate and the incumbent? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Posted September 2, 2024 Report Posted September 2, 2024 6 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: What? How can you be the change candidate and the incumbent? Reality is just a social construct to Libbies. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
gatomontes99 Posted September 2, 2024 Author Report Posted September 2, 2024 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Reality is just a social construct to Libbies. I may have mentioned that before. 1 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted September 3, 2024 Report Posted September 3, 2024 9 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: What? How can you be the change candidate and the incumbent? She's not the incumbent. Not any more than G.H.W.B was running as an incumbent to succeed Reagan or Gore to succeed Clinton. VPs are their own people. 1 1 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted September 3, 2024 Report Posted September 3, 2024 2 hours ago, Hodad said: She's not the incumbent. Not any more than G.H.W.B was running as an incumbent to succeed Reagan or Gore to succeed Clinton. VPs are their own people. Didn't Bush and Gore win primary elections? You know...democratically? 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted September 3, 2024 Report Posted September 3, 2024 (edited) 3 hours ago, Hodad said: She's not the incumbent. Not any more than G.H.W.B was running as an incumbent to succeed Reagan or Gore to succeed Clinton. VPs are their own people. She's literally running because she's the incumbent. She was vice pres when the current pres had to step down because he was whackadoodle. She's literally where she is because she's part of the incumbent gov't. If she wants to be her own people win a nomination. Edited September 3, 2024 by CdnFox 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted September 3, 2024 Author Report Posted September 3, 2024 6 hours ago, Hodad said: She's not the incumbent. Not any more than G.H.W.B was running as an incumbent to succeed Reagan or Gore to succeed Clinton. VPs are their own people. Yes she is. She cannot separate herself from the policies without criticizing Joe Biden and herself. Saying there needs to be a new way forward is an admission that her and Joe's policies were bad. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted September 3, 2024 Report Posted September 3, 2024 25 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Yes she is. She cannot separate herself from the policies without criticizing Joe Biden and herself. Saying there needs to be a new way forward is an admission that her and Joe's policies were bad. Sure, no VP running for the top job has ever presented new policy ideas or a new message.🙄 And it's pretty easy to be the "change candidate" against the massive sack of crap that is a recently fired, one-term, twice-impeached, convicted felon who feels like an ex that America is waaay over and ready to move on from. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 3, 2024 Author Report Posted September 3, 2024 19 minutes ago, Hodad said: Sure, no VP running for the top job has ever presented new policy ideas or a new message.🙄 And it's pretty easy to be the "change candidate" against the massive sack of crap that is a recently fired, one-term, twice-impeached, convicted felon who feels like an ex that America is waaay over and ready to move on from. Why would you say something so intellectually dishobest? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted September 3, 2024 Report Posted September 3, 2024 4 hours ago, Hodad said: Sure, no VP running for the top job has ever presented new policy ideas or a new message.🙄 Sure they do - they present it when they run for the nomination and everyone gets to hear it in detail and dems decide if they support it or not and nominate them. Not all will be nominated but if they are they have the right to stand as their own voice. Harris did that right? She went through the nomination process to win the right to stand seperate from the administration she currently is part of right? ooooopssssiieeeeee Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted September 3, 2024 Report Posted September 3, 2024 12 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Yes she is. She cannot separate herself from the policies without criticizing Joe Biden and herself. Saying there needs to be a new way forward is an admission that her and Joe's policies were bad. Different doesn't even IMPLY criticism. Duh Say it with me: "personal PREFERENCE." 11 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Why would you say something so intellectually dishobest? Why would write a word that is just DRIVEL? LMAO Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 3, 2024 Author Report Posted September 3, 2024 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Different doesn't even IMPLY criticism. Duh Say it with me: "personal PREFERENCE." Yes it does. If what they did was working, they wouldn't need a new way forward. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted September 3, 2024 Report Posted September 3, 2024 5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Yes it does. If what they did was working, they wouldn't need a new way forward. Say it with me: "personal PREFERENCE." A "new way forward" may be BETTER than a way that was working. Improvement is ALWAYS ACHIEVABLE. Duh Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 3, 2024 Author Report Posted September 3, 2024 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Say it with me: "personal PREFERENCE." A "new way forward" may be BETTER than a way that was working. Improvement is ALWAYS ACHIEVABLE. Duh Lol...personal preference? That's pulling some stuff out of you know where. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted September 4, 2024 Report Posted September 4, 2024 58 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Lol...personal preference? That's pulling some stuff out of you know where. Which is his personal preference when it comes to pulling things and we shouldn't be judging Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted September 4, 2024 Report Posted September 4, 2024 5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Lol...personal preference? That's pulling some stuff out of you know where. What don't you understand about the meaning of "personal preference"? Do you believe pols never make policy based on their personal evaluation of the effects? LMAO Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 4, 2024 Author Report Posted September 4, 2024 5 hours ago, robosmith said: What don't you understand about the meaning of "personal preference"? Do you believe pols never make policy based on their personal evaluation of the effects? LMAO She's been part of the administration. She has repeatedly claimed to be the last person in the room on major decisions. She owns the policies and their results. Saying she wants a "new way forward" is an admission that what she did isn't popular enough to get her elected. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.