Kamala Harris believed at one time police should not answer 911 calls.

[User]

42 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Stop obsessing over characters you've made up in your head, it can't be healthy. You come off like a sex offender tbh.

You brought this all on yourself trying to defend your absurd position that men pretending to be women are actually women. 

You further brought this on yourself being all butt hurt about calling a fake vagina, fake. 

[Black Dog]

7 minutes ago, User said:

You brought this all on yourself trying to defend your absurd position that men pretending to be women are actually women. 

You further brought this on yourself being all butt hurt about calling a fake vagina, fake. 

I'm not sure how I'm to blame for your deranged genital obsession. Take responsibility for your own perversions.

[User]

4 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I'm not sure how I'm to blame for your deranged genital obsession. Take responsibility for your own perversions.

You brought it up, trying to defend your princess boyfriends fake vagina making him a "real" woman. 

[Black Dog]

14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

it literally is.  If you have the legal right to do something you have lawful authority. 

It's literally not what those terms mean legally as I just explained. A citizen's arrest is a perfect example, like the  case of the Toronto shopkeeper a few years back who chased down and detained a shoplifter; his actions were deemed legal, but he was still widely referred to as a vigilante.

Quote

 

Nope

hell - even in CANADA citizens have the right to arrest people

 

Yes and that could be considered an act of vigilantism. I think you and the pervert are getting hung up on the negative connotations of the term vigilante as opposed to regarding it as a neutral description of someone acting as a law enforcement without actually being a cop or other legal authority. 

5 minutes ago, User said:

You brought it up, trying to defend your princess boyfriends fake vagina making him a "real" woman. 

None of that happened. In addition to being obsessed with genitals to the point of bringing them up in completely unrelated threads, you're lying here. Clearly your fetish is overtaking your capacity for rational thought.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

It's literally not what those terms mean legally as I just explained

ROFLMAO - You mean as you just lied!  I've just posted the proof that it VERY literally IS what those terms mean

Quote

Yes and that could be considered an act of vigilantism. 

Not even a teeny tiny bit  

As i posted a vigilante is someone who acts without lawful authority. 

The law grants people the authority. 

Therefore - not vigilante  

But considering you seem confused over what a vagina is i guess there was slim hope you'd get your head around THIS subject    

My god man... do you think this thread is going well for you? Asking for a friend....  

[User]

7 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

None of that happened. In addition to being obsessed with genitals to the point of bringing them up in completely unrelated threads, you're lying here. Clearly your fetish is overtaking your capacity for rational thought.

You can't grasp the difference between mockery and insults with lying... just like you can't tell the difference between a man pretending to be a woman with a fake vagina and a real woman. 

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, User said:

You can't grasp the difference between mockery and insults with lying... just like you can't tell the difference between a man pretending to be a woman with a fake vagina and a real woman. 

we should get a sarcasm sign. 

[Black Dog]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

ROFLMAO - You mean as you just lied!  I've just posted the proof that it VERY literally IS what those terms mean

Is that what you think you did? Wow you really are illiterate.

4 minutes ago, User said:

You can't grasp the difference between mockery and insults with lying... just like you can't tell the difference between a man pretending to be a woman with a fake vagina and a real woman. 

You invented a scenario that did not happen and claimed it did. That's called lying. You should seek professional help for your genital fixation.

Edited August 27, 2024 by Black Dog

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Is that what you think you did? Wow you really are illiterate.

OhhhNOOOOOEESSS!!  ANd i hurt your feelings so badly you had to give me a little down arrow!  Did that make you feel like a real woman/man, like you managed to stand up to the nasty bully who's laughing at you because you don't understand english very well  

Poor thing, sounds like i really emotionally scarred you this time   

Now now, dry your tears little guy   We'll find you a safe space and a puppy in a bit. 

In the meantime i see you're doubling down on the stupid   

Vigilantes are people whithout lawful authority. the law grants people in these cases authority. Ergo  people in these cases are not vigilantes. 

It really doesn't get more simple and you STILL screwed it up  vagina-boy    ROFLMAO!! God i love coming here, you can't buy this kind of entertainment.

[User]

6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Is that what you think you did? Wow you really are illiterate.

You invented a scenario that did not happen and claimed it did. That's called lying. You should seek professional help for your genital fixation.

You are here pushing a lie that men can be women... and that they can even have fake vaginas too! Except, you get really mad about my calling them fake, but won't say what we should call your boyfriends fake vagina. 

[Black Dog]

Just now, User said:

You are here pushing a lie that men can be women... and that they can even have fake vaginas too! Except, you get really mad about my calling them fake, but won't say what we should call your boyfriends fake vagina. 

So you're a compulsive liar and a genital obsessed weirdo.

[WestCanMan]

45 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

it literally is.  If you have the legal right to do something you have lawful authority. 

Nope

hell - even in CANADA citizens have the right to arrest people

What You Need to Know About Making a Citizen's Arrest (justice.gc.ca)

In the states is quite common 

citizen's arrest | Wex Legal Dictionary / Encyclopedia | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)

And no it's not even a little bit "only the land owner".  If a person witnesses a crime being committed they may arrest that person (with some restrictions in  some states as to which crime). 

You are 100 percent absolutely wrong here and @User  is making you look uneducated on the subject.   You need to read a little bit more before you dig yourself deeper.

With a handful of caveates, a person in the united states witnessing a crime has full authority to arrest the person committing the crime, to use reasonable force to restrain them, and if that person attacks them to use force to defend themselves.

So not a vigilante.

You gotta let up now. His tears are real. 

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

You gotta let up now. His tears are real. 

Shouldn't you be crying about all the 97 year olds cut down in the prime of their lives by Covid vaccine lol.

[WestCanMan]

Just now, Black Dog said:

Shouldn't you be crying about all the 97 year olds cut down in the prime of their lives by Covid vaccine lol.

I'd make a joke about you for coming up with a new vaxtard narrative "Only nonagenarians were harmed by the jabs", but what you just did is way beyond vile. You're sitting there lying your face off, while making light of actual serious, permanent injuries and deaths to young people from the pseudovax.

You're a seriously vile piece of sh1t, Dirty B1tch. You make Hodad look like Mother Teresa.

[User]

10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

So you're a compulsive liar and a genital obsessed weirdo.

You brought all this up, you have no one to blame here but yourself. 

[Black Dog]

3 minutes ago, User said:

You brought all this up, you have no one to blame here but yourself. 

See you're lying again, incredible. 

[User]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

See you're lying again, incredible. 

No lie Mr Men can have vaginas too... 

[Black Dog]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I'd make a joke about you for coming up with a new vaxtard narrative "Only nonagenarians were harmed by the jabs", but what you just did is way beyond vile.

It's a fact that the overwhelming majority of people who died with COVID in January 2022 were in the 80+ age bracket followed by the 70+ group.

Edited August 27, 2024 by Black Dog

[Black Dog]

3 minutes ago, User said:

No lie Mr Men can have vaginas too... 

Again: your genital obsession is not my responsibility.

[User]

5 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Again: your genital obsession is not my responsibility.

Again, you brought this up because you think men can be women. 

[CdnFox]

37 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Shouldn't you be crying about all the 97 year olds cut down in the prime of their lives by Covid vaccine lol.

Awww    guess those tears ARE real   

And more little down arrows trying to make yourself feel like a real man   How sad you've been reduced to this 

[WestCanMan]

47 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It's a fact that the overwhelming majority of people who died with COVID in January 2022 were in the 80+ age bracket followed by the 70+ group.

1. You weren't talking about "died with covid" you lying piece of sh1t. You were talking about "killed by the covid vaccine". 
2. It's a fact that the overwhelming majority of people who died with COVID during every month of the pandemic were in the 80+ age bracket followed by the 70+ group. Are you f'ing retarded? Did you honestly think that just happened in 2022?

There's not a single second of 2022 on that chart, dunce. That goes from the very first death in Canada that was attributed to covid, in January or February(?) 2020, right until the 344th day of 2021. So nearly 2 full years. 

There were less than 20 deaths in the under 20 group, which is probably about 1/4 of our population, and over 18,000 deaths in the over 80 group, which is about 4% of the population. The correlation between age and covid deaths was blatantly obvious to everyone who was paying attention. The only stronger risk factor for covid mortality was co-morbidities: things like diabetes, COPD, heart disease, etc, that usually get worse as people age. About 96% of the people who died of covid had a pre-existing condition. Usually more than 1 of them. 

I knew back in spring of 2020 that young, healthy people didn't need the vax. And not just from conspiracy theorists. I saw Dr Oz talk about it on TV, so a lot of people knew. And unlike you I don't just believe everything I see on TV, so I looked for stats to either prove or disprove it, and it turns out he was correct.

Did it really take until 2022 for you to learn that? Are you honestly that f'ing clueless, and disconnected from reality?

You know that the vax-rollouts started with the seniors, right? Did you think that was just chosen randomly? 

[Black Dog]

1 hour ago, User said:

Again, you brought this up because you think men can be women. 

Again, you're lying.

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Awww    guess those tears ARE real   

And more little down arrows trying to make yourself feel like a real man   How sad you've been reduced to this 

Yeah keep telling on yourself here.

 

23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1. You weren't talking about "died with covid" you lying piece of sh1t. You were talking about "killed by the covid vaccine". 
2. It's a fact that the overwhelming majority of people who died with COVID during every month of the pandemic were in the 80+ age bracket followed by the 70+ group. Are you f'ing retarded? Did you honestly think that just happened in 2022?

There's not a single second of 2022 on that chart, dunce. That goes from the very first death in Canada that was attributed to covid, in January or February(?) 2020, right until the 344th day of 2021. So nearly 2 full years. 

There were less than 20 deaths in the under 20 group, which is probably about 1/4 of our population, and over 18,000 deaths in the over 80 group, which is about 4% of the population. The correlation between age and covid deaths was blatantly obvious to everyone who was paying attention. The only stronger risk factor for covid mortality was co-morbidities: things like diabetes, COPD, heart disease, etc, that usually get worse as people age. About 96% of the people who died of covid had a pre-existing condition. Usually more than 1 of them. 

I knew back in spring of 2020 that young, healthy people didn't need the vax. And not just from conspiracy theorists. I saw Dr Oz talk about it on TV, so a lot of people knew. And unlike you I don't just believe everything I see on TV, so I looked for stats to either prove or disprove it, and it turns out he was correct.

Did it really take until 2022 for you to learn that? Are you honestly that f'ing clueless, and disconnected from reality?

You know that the vax-rollouts started with the seniors, right? Did you think that was just chosen randomly? 

[User]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Again, you're lying.

Nope, you are. You still won't say what we are supposed to call a fake vagina, either. 

Seriously dude, these are your stupid arguments. You can't defend them, so you just run away. 

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, User said:

Nope, you are. You still won't say what we are supposed to call a fake vagina, either. 

Seriously dude, these are your stupid arguments. You can't defend them, so you just run away. 

Another lie, how many is that? 

Edited August 27, 2024 by Black Dog