Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

You certainly said he was. Again and again. I was the one that argued he wasn't.

No I didn't, no you didn't and you'll fail to show otherwise again and again like you always do.

You're ridiculously predictable.

  • Like 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Justin got caught trying to break the law that harper put in place so actually harper did succeed.

What was Trudeau charged with, what was he convicted of, how much time is he serving and where is he serving it?

 

  • Like 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
3 hours ago, eyeball said:

No I didn't, no you didn't and you'll fail to show otherwise again and again like you always do.

You're ridiculously predictable.

Kiddo i've shown you've lied about that many times. And if i do it again you'll just say the same thing next week. 

Fact is you know it and I know it, and that's all that matters.  Everyone else already thinks you're a liar and has a low opinion of you so it's not like i've got anything to prove :) 

Remember your whole "but that means trudeau could pass a law making murder legal!!!!" routine?  And then when you had an absolute hissy fit when i pointed out that justin DID get caught by harper's new laws? LOLOL good times ;) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
3 hours ago, eyeball said:

What was Trudeau charged with, what was he convicted of, how much time is he serving and where is he serving it?

 

We've been through this all before. He was found guilty of violating sections 5,11,12, and 21[1] of the Federal Conflict of Interest Act by accepting private-island vacations, gifts, and flights from the Aga Khan. 

In short taking bribes.  The RCMP also stated that he clearly broke the bribery laws but couldn't pursue it because the PM has the right to grant permission to accept bribes in certain circumstances and therefore may have given himself permission to break the law so they couldn't prosecute. 

You ask the same questions over and over and over. You're little more than a liar and a scumbag.  It's as if the truth burns you or something. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

...i've shown you've lied about that many times.

You can't show a single case of this either.

So many examples and yet you can't produce a single one.

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

The RCMP also stated that he clearly broke the bribery laws but couldn't pursue it because the PM has the right to grant permission to accept bribes in certain circumstances and therefore may have given himself permission to break the law so they couldn't prosecute. 

Sure, you usually trot this out after it's shown you can't show where I lied, again and again and many times as you put it

You resort to giving the sort of weight that's reserved for murder for these crimes whenever you can't back up your claim that I blamed Stephan Harper for Trudeau's actions which as you know was his interference into a criminal prosecution of SNC Lavalin.

Here you are claiming it again to this day.

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No you don't. If you did you'd have condemned Justin Trudeau left right and center for ages. Instead you blamed his actions on harper not being Tough Enough (???)

All I ever blamed on Harper was his useless attempt at introducing Transparency and Accountability into our governance, as evidenced by the ease with which Trudeau ducked the SNC Lavalin scandal.

Your heads been in a permanent state of BOOM ever since.

Trudeau broke the law not Harper and I condemn Trudeau for breaking it not Harper.

Jody Wilson-Raybould blew the whistle on Trudeau and that's the only reason anyone ever knew about it. Further to that no one has proposed to do anything to prevent anyone from attempting the same thing in the future.

 

 

  • Like 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
3 hours ago, eyeball said:

You can't show a single case of this either.

 

Sure I can. Have many times. But you pull this little nonsense 5 minutes later every time so there's really not much point. I know it and you know it and that's enough for me.

Quote

So many examples and yet you can't produce a single one.

See above

Quote

Sure, you usually trot this out after it's shown you can't show where I lied, again and again and many times as you put it

see above

Quote

You resort to giving the sort of weight that's reserved for murder for these crimes whenever you can't back up your claim that I blamed Stephan Harper for Trudeau's actions which as you know was his interference into a criminal prosecution of SNC Lavalin.

Oh look, a lie. Yawn.

I've never claimed it was anything remotely like a murder. Certainly didn't say so here. Trudeau broke the law. He committed crimes. Those are facts. But you can't help but lie can you? And everyone can see that you are beginning to break down and become angry that you've been called on your lies.

Quote

All I ever blamed on Harper was his useless attempt at introducing Transparency and Accountability into our governance, as evidenced by the ease with which Trudeau ducked the SNC Lavalin scandal.

He literally got caught in the snc lavalin scandal and had to back down on his promise to lavalin about giving them a deal. He only "Dodged it"  in the sense that losers like you chose to vote him back in again despite knowing the truth. But that's not harper's fault

Quote

Your heads been in a permanent state of BOOM ever since.

Says the guy who's currently experiencing a meltdown :) 

Quote

Trudeau broke the law not Harper and I condemn Trudeau for breaking it not Harper.

No you don't. You don't even accept that trudeau broke the law. You literally just above went through your whole oh what law did he break he didn't break any laws when did he go to jail routine. You just pretended you didn't know that he broke any laws despite the fact we've had this conversation a dozen times. Be very clearly don't think he broke the law, you just don't know what else to say when you get caught

 

Quote

Jody Wilson-Raybould blew the whistle on Trudeau and that's the only reason anyone ever knew about it.

Yes, she reported a crime. That's how most crimes come to light. And Trudeau was forced to give up and suffered politically. And if you and your kind had done your jobs he would have been out of power

Which is exactly how law is supposed to work. So the law did exactly what it was supposed to.

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Not once.

Many many times.  But as always you lie about it because you lie about literally everything that doesn't fit your view. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
29 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Many many times.  But as always you lie about it because you lie about literally everything that doesn't fit your view. 

You're simply projecting, again.

  • Haha 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
58 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You're simply projecting, again.

You're simply simple again :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Our legal system is not a justice system. That's the issue. Judges aren't interested in meting out justice. Their sentences are generally guided more by their ideological views, which tend to stray pretty far over into the Left side of the political spectrum. They see their primary job as guarding the interests of the person on trial, not society.

They aren't appointed for their legal knowledge or wisdom, but for the similarity of their ideological views with those of Justin Trudeau. As well as their membership in preferred identity groups.

Edited by I am Groot

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...