The Case Against Joe

[gatomontes99]

House Oversight Committee Findings

Quote

Below are key findings from the impeachment inquiry report. The 291 page report can be found  here.

• From 2014 to the present, as part of a conspiracy to monetize Joe Biden’s office of public trust to enrich the Biden family, Biden family members and their associates received over $27 million from foreign individuals or entities. In order to obscure the source of these funds, the Biden family and their associates set up shell companies to conceal these payments from scrutiny. The Biden family used proceeds from these business activities to provide hundreds of thousands of dollars to Joe Biden—including thousands of dollars that are directly traceable to China. While Jim Biden claimed he gave this money to Joe Biden to repay personal loans, Jim Biden did not provide any evidence to support this claim. The Biden family’s receipt of millions of dollars required Joe Biden’s knowing participation in this conspiracy, including while he served as Vice President.
• Joe Biden used his status as Vice President to garner favorable outcomes for his son’s and his business partners’ foreign business dealings.Witnesses acknowledged that Hunter Biden involved Vice President Biden in many of his business dealings with Russian, Romanian, Chinese, Kazakhstani, and Ukrainian individuals and companies.Then-Vice President Biden met or spoke with nearly every one of the Biden family’s foreign business associates, including those from Ukraine, China, Russia, and Kazakhstan. As a result, the Biden family has received millions of dollars from these foreign entities.
• The Biden family leveraged Joe Biden’s positions of public trust to obtain over $8 million in loans from Democratic benefactors. Millions of dollars in loans have not been repaid and the paperwork supporting many of the loans does not exist and has not been produced to the Committees. This raises serious questions about whether these funds were provided as gifts disguised as loans.
• Under the Biden Administration, the Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) afforded special treatment to President Biden’s son, Hunter Biden.Several witnesses acknowledged the delicate approach used during the Hunter Biden case, describing the investigation as “sensitive” or “significant.” Evidence shows that Department officials slow-walked the investigation, informed defense counsel of future investigative actions, prevented line investigators from taking otherwise ordinary investigative steps, and allowed the statute of limitations to expire on the most serious felony charges. These unusual—and oftentimes in the view of witnesses, unprecedented—tactics conflicted with standard operating procedures and ultimately had the effect of benefiting Hunter Biden.
• The Biden Justice Department misled Congress about the independence of law enforcement entities in the criminal investigation of Hunter Biden. Biden Administration political appointees exercised significant oversight and control over the investigation of the President’s son. Witnesses described how U.S. Attorney for the District of Delaware and now-Special Counsel David Weiss, who oversaw the investigation and prosecution of Hunter Biden, had to seek (1) agreement from other U.S. Attorneys to bring cases in a district geographically distinct from his own and (2) approval from the Biden Justice Department’s Tax Division to bring specific charges or take investigative actions against Hunter Biden. Despite the clear conflict of interest, Weiss was only afforded special counsel status after the investigation came under congressional scrutiny.
• The White House has obstructed the Committees’ impeachment inquiry by withholding key documents and witnesses. The White House has impeded the Committees’ investigation of President Biden’s unlawful retention of classified documents, by refusing to make relevant witnesses available for interviews and by erroneously asserting executive privilege over audio recordings from Special Counsel Hur’s interviews with President Biden. In addition, the White House is preventing the National Archives from turning over documents that are material to the Committees’ inquiry.
   

Between his Cognitive Decline and his corruption, Joe had to go and the Dems knew it.

[Chrissy1979]

Why do Trumpsters think cognitive decline and corruption are good things?

[gatomontes99]

29 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Why do Trumpsters think cognitive decline and corruption are good things?

It's fun how you make stuff up and assume it's true. Let me try:

Why do liberals do good things that never hurt anyone?

See, it's funny because liberals are.extremely corrupt and all of their policies make people poor, deny medical care or just flat kill them.

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

House Oversight Committee Findings

Between his Cognitive Decline and his corruption, Joe had to go and the Dems knew it.

Well… Bring It On!  
Thats a big list of unproven accusations, so if a law was broken, prosecute.  So far, Comer has got a Big Ass List of Accusations and an empty list of Evidence. 
 

But Joe Biden isn’t running for President. 

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Why do Trumpsters think cognitive decline and corruption are good things?

It's not good anymore because the hair sniffer is out of the race and he would've been easy to beat.  

[gatomontes99]

2 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Well… Bring It On!  
Thats a big list of unproven accusations, so if a law was broken, prosecute.  So far, Comer has got a Big Ass List of Accusations and an empty list of Evidence. 
 

But Joe Biden isn’t running for President. 

Yep. There is no evidence other than the canceled bank checks, the Hunter laptop, WhatsApp messages, the multiple business partner sworn testimony, Joe bragging about it on video, the burner phone, the alias email addresses, the myriad of shell companies, the $27 million in deposits and more that I've forgotten. Other than that....THERE IS NO EVIDENCE! LOL

[Chrissy1979]

It was all BS and you were played for a fool. Just like Benghazi!

[impartialobserver]

Impeachment... here we go again. Yawnnn... 

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Yep. There is no evidence other than the canceled bank checks, the Hunter laptop, WhatsApp messages, the multiple business partner sworn testimony, Joe bragging about it on video, the burner phone, the alias email addresses, the myriad of shell companies, the $27 million in deposits and more that I've forgotten. Other than that....THERE IS NO EVIDENCE! LOL

If there was evidence the House would have at least brought impeachment to a vote.  GOP has the majority but they have no evidence.  

[gatomontes99]

20 minutes ago, Rebound said:

If there was evidence the House would have at least brought impeachment to a vote.  GOP has the majority but they have no evidence.  

They literally just finished the inquiry.