11 Children stabbed, 2 dead in attack by Muslim asylum seeker in UK.

[ironstone]

39 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

There is no connection. 

Are there any issues or tensions in the UK because of mass immigration?

Let's see what's going on in Birmingham...mostly peaceful according to the mainstream media in the UK. Notice anything about who appears to be doing the 'bad behavior'?

 

[Black Dog]

Just now, ironstone said:

Are there any issues or tensions in the UK because of mass immigration?

The crime that precipitated all this was carried out by a native born person and only turned into civil unrest because dumb right wingers believe everything they read online.

Quote

 

Let's see what's going on in Birmingham...mostly peaceful according to the mainstream media in the UK. Notice anything about who appears to be doing the 'bad behavior'?

 

Now do Rotherham, Liverpool, Manchester, Stoke-on-Trent, Leeds etc etc etc... Notice anything there?

 

 

 

[ironstone]

25 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

The crime that precipitated all this was carried out by a native born person and only turned into civil unrest because dumb right wingers believe everything they read online.

Now do Rotherham, Liverpool, Manchester, Stoke-on-Trent, Leeds etc etc etc... Notice anything there?

 

 

 

I would condemn any and all riots. However, it's kind of naive to suggest that those hundreds of thousands pouring in to the UK annually are integrating seamlessly into British society.

There are 'native born' individuals in the UK that went to fight for ISIS or engaged in terrorist attacks on home soil, so what's your point? (Associated with a certain religion)

[Black Dog]

3 minutes ago, ironstone said:

I would condemn any and all riots. However, it's kind of naive to suggest that those hundreds of thousands pouring in to the UK annually are integrating seamlessly into British society.

That "however" is doing an awful lot of work there. Big "I'm not racist BUT" vibes.

Quote

There are 'native born' individuals in the UK that went to fight for ISIS or engaged in terrorist attacks on home soil, so what's your point? (Associated with a certain religion)

And native born Englishmen also started these riots so maybe there's nothing inherently virtuous about the accident of one's birth 

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

There is no connection. 

Yeah, there's definitely a connection. Almost every major event of his life played a part in it. Even racism from other people would have played a part. The violence that his family members were subjected to/participated in in Rwanda played a part in forming the person he was. We just don't know how much until we know what really motivated him. The tough part is that we only ever hear about those motives if the perps are white males. If it's a muslim or a trans, the story remains buried. 

You're just a dumb guy, what I said was all over your head. 

[Black Dog]

20 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Yeah, there's definitely a connection. Almost every major event of his life played a part in it. Even racism from other people would have played a part. The violence that his family members were subjected to/participated in in Rwanda played a part in forming the person he was. We just don't know how much until we know what really motivated him. The tough part is that we only ever hear about those motives if the perps are white males. If it's a muslim or a trans, the story remains buried. 

You're just a dumb guy, what I said was all over your head. 

The problem with your narrative here is that your guys often leave manifestos behind explaining why they do what they do.

 

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

The problem with your narrative here is that your guys often leave manifestos behind explaining why they do what they do.

 

There's no narrative, just the truth. "Your guys", aka the terrorists, also leave their trail of evidence behind, but leftists run cover for them. "He wasn't a muslim. Just his mom, dad and siblings were muslims."

[Black Dog]

12 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

There's no narrative, just the truth. "Your guys", aka the terrorists, also leave their trail of evidence behind, but leftists run cover for them. "He wasn't a muslim. Just his mom, dad and siblings were muslims."

So you're projecting your anxieties and weirdo conspiracy theories about imaginary events onto this actual event about which we know almost nothing. Normal guy.

[ironstone]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

That "however" is doing an awful lot of work there. Big "I'm not racist BUT" vibes.

It's more about the religion actually. And religion isn't a race either. Again, I would condemn anyone carrying out acts of violence in the name of religion, but let's be real, there is one religion that does have a rather serious issue with extremism, more so than the rest.

[WestCanMan]

9 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

So you're projecting your anxieties and weirdo conspiracy theories about imaginary events onto this actual event about which we know almost nothing. Normal guy.

As usual, your post could be replaced by this photo and not a shred of quality would be lost:

[Black Dog]

16 hours ago, ironstone said:

It's more about the religion actually. And religion isn't a race either. Again, I would condemn anyone carrying out acts of violence in the name of religion, but let's be real, there is one religion that does have a rather serious issue with extremism, more so than the rest.

And what does that have to do with any of what's going on here?

16 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

As usual, your post could be replaced by this photo and not a shred of quality would be lost:

Your obsession with scat photos is noted.

Edited August 7, 2024 by Black Dog

[ironstone]

46 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

And what does that have to do with any of what's going on here?

We don't know yet, perhaps nothing at all. The public may never know the full story because the media and the current UK government want to control the narrative.

This is nothing new, we've seen this kind of news coverage before, or lack thereof. If the alleged perpetrator is a white male, the story will get a lot more coverage and the public will find out more information about that person and possible motives. It's a different story if an alleged perpetrator is non-white or of a certain religion, or perhaps transgender or something like that. In those cases, the story tends to go down the memory hole rather quickly.

Keir Starmer was quick to condemn rioters that he deemed far-right, but 'other' rioters were treated differently, far fewer arrests, if any. And a drastic difference in the amount of police assigned to each group. That's why he already earned the nickname 'two tier Steir'.

And again, I condemn the use of violence by all sides.

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, ironstone said:

We don't know yet, perhaps nothing at all. The public may never know the full story because the media and the current UK government want to control the narrative.

There was no connection to immigration from the get go.

Quote

This is nothing new, we've seen this kind of news coverage before, or lack thereof. If the alleged perpetrator is a white male, the story will get a lot more coverage and the public will find out more information about that person and possible motives. It's a different story if an alleged perpetrator is non-white or of a certain religion, or perhaps transgender or something like that. In those cases, the story tends to go down the memory hole rather quickly.

LOL this is utter horseshit. 

 

Quote

Keir Starmer was quick to condemn rioters that he deemed far-right, but 'other' rioters were treated differently, far fewer arrests, if any. And a drastic difference in the amount of police assigned to each group. That's why he already earned the nickname 'two tier Steir'.

Gee I wonder if that has anything to do with the fact that there was a dramatic difference in scale of the riots and the level of violence. It's notable, for example, that i keep seeing the same video of one guy getting beaten up outside the pub and a couple of other incidents, but nothing compared to the rock throwing, assaults, arson and rampant destruction carried out by the far right.

[ironstone]

8 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

LOL this is utter horseshit. 

A couple of examples. The Pulse Nightclub shooting in Florida, 49 killed, 53 wounded. The story vanished rather quickly once they found out the shooter was a Middle Eastern man. Didn't fit the narrative.

The Nashville school shooting. Down the memory hole as soon as it was determined that the shooter was trans. Authorities refused to release the shooter's manifesto. It has since been leaked by someone.

The shooting after the most recent Super Bowl.

Race and religion play a role in how a story gets covered, or not covered.

 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

Your obsession with scat photos is noted.

The similarity between what that dog is doing and what you're saying is what's being noted. It's the perfect metaphor for your posts.

If I just photoshopped a keyboard behind that dog, even your mom would swear it was you. 

[Black Dog]

11 minutes ago, ironstone said:

A couple of examples. The Pulse Nightclub shooting in Florida, 49 killed, 53 wounded. The story vanished rather quickly once they found out the shooter was a Middle Eastern man. Didn't fit the narrative.

That didn't happen. 

Quote

The Nashville school shooting. Down the memory hole as soon as it was determined that the shooter was trans. Authorities refused to release the shooter's manifesto. It has since been leaked by someone.

That's weird, I can google and find plenty of articles where the shooter's gender id is mentioned, kinda weird for something that was "memory holed". And of course it's worth mentioning that it was the school and the parents of the victims who contested the release of the "manifesto" but I suppose they're in on it too.

Quote

The shooting after the most recent Super Bowl.

What about it? 

Quote

Race and religion play a role in how a story gets covered, or not covered.

Or maybe political violence where the perp leaves extensive evidence of their reasons is more newsworthy than everyday criminal acts.

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The similarity between what that dog is doing and what you're saying is what's being noted. It's the perfect metaphor for your posts.

If I just photoshopped a keyboard behind that dog, even your mom would swear it was you. 

Do you eat the dogshit or do you just like the way it feels in your hands?

Edited August 7, 2024 by Black Dog

[WestCanMan]

16 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

[paraphrasing]

Nailed it.

[Black Dog]

17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Nailed it.

Not beating the poop fetish allegations here, shiteater.

[ironstone]

29 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

What about it? 

You didn't watch the short video link I put up. There was a shooting at the parade and authorities did not want to release details about the shooters until photos were made public. They were hesitant to release details because the shooters were both black.

There was even a case where a man (black) drove a car into a Christmas parade and one media outlet reported about the car, but not about the race of the suspect.

For the umpteenth time, my position is that the public has a right to know about all the suspects in these horrific crimes. Photos, names, motives. Young offenders are different, but the public should still have a right to know about their motives.

[WestCanMan]

4 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You're on a roll. Easily the most sophisticated liberal here, by far. 

[Black Dog]

Just now, ironstone said:

You didn't watch the short video link I put up.

No I didn't because Ann Coulter is a racist nutjob.

Quote

There was a shooting at the parade and authorities did not want to release details about the shooters until photos were made public.

Cite?

Quote

They were hesitant to release details because the shooters were both black.

lol they released the shooters names as soon as they were arrested. Two other suspects didn't have their names released because they were juveniles. Your conspiracy is shit.

Quote

There was even a case where a man (black) drove a car into a Christmas parade and one media outlet reported about the car, but not about the race of the suspect.

Which media outlet? Do you have a link?

Quote

 

For the umpteenth time, my position is that the public has a right to know about all the suspects in these horrific crimes. Photos, names, motives. Young offenders are different, but the public should still have a right to know about their motives.

 

You haven't done a very good job of making your case that there's a double standard based on teh race or religion of a criminal.

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You're on a roll. Easily the most sophisticated liberal here, by far. 

So when you're eating shit, do you like the soft poops or the crunchier ones with like peanuts in it?

[WestCanMan]

30 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

So when you're eating shit, do you like the soft poops or the crunchier ones with like peanuts in it?

You're projecting.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, ironstone said:

We don't know yet, perhaps nothing at all. The public may never know the full story because the media and the current UK government want to control the narrative.

This is nothing new, we've seen this kind of news coverage before, or lack thereof. If the alleged perpetrator is a white male, the story will get a lot more coverage and the public will find out more information about that person and possible motives. It's a different story if an alleged perpetrator is non-white or of a certain religion, or perhaps transgender or something like that. In those cases, the story tends to go down the memory hole rather quickly.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/24/us/waukesha-car-parade-crowd-wednesday/index.html

• Six people were killed and another 62 were injured in the ensuing crash, according to a criminal complaint filed in Waukesha County Circuit Court. The youngest victim who died was only 8 years old, according to his family’s GoFundMe. More than a dozen people remain hospitalized at a nearby children’s hospital, and three were released Tuesday, according to the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin.

Was it a "crash" though, CNN? This is from later in the same article: "It was like the SUV was trying to avoid vehicles, not people. There was no attempt made by the vehicle to stop, much less slow down,”

Still, another quote from the same article: “The vehicle then appeared to rapidly accelerate, as Officer Butryn heard tires squeal,” the complaint read. “At this point, it was clear to Officer Butryn that this was an intentional act to strike and hurt as many people as possible.”

CNN says "a crash". Leftard media universally claimed that the driver was fleeing a domestic violence scene, but no evidence of anyone chasing Brooks through that Christmas parade was ever cited. 

It was also the second time that guy used that vehicle to run people over in less than 3 months, and he had just made a rap video about the Rittenhouse verdict, from a week earlier, before he ran over the people in the Christmas parade where Rittenhouse lived/worked. Coincidence? Sure, why not? It was just a "crash" with no underlying motives lol.

 

That's the same CNN that was unequivocal about the fact that the "car crash" at the Charlotte rally was a terrorist attack. 

Leftard media somehow failed to notice that the car that tore through the Charlottesville crowd was hit by a guy with a bat right before he sped off. There's video of it on Youtube, but somehow CNN never saw it. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTdcCx54pQ0

The video can only be watched on Youtube - graphic violence...

 

So the Charlotte driver had no reason for his 'car crash', although there's a video of his car surrounded by protesters as someone hits his car with a bat before he took off, he's plainly a terrorist. The Waukesha guy was being chased by an unnamed, invisible person when he used his car-of-choice for vehicle attacks to run over 60 people, right in the town which he made pro-BLM rap song about. Case closed.

[Black Dog]

38 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Was it a "crash" though, CNN? 

WTF else would they call it? 

Quote

It was also the second time that guy used that vehicle to run people over in less than 3 months, and he had just made a rap video about the Rittenhouse verdict, from a week earlier, before he ran over the people in the Christmas parade where Rittenhouse lived/worked. Coincidence? Sure, why not? It was just a "crash" with no underlying motives lol.

The media not reporting on stuff at the time of the crash that wasn't known at that time is not evidence of a cover up, shiteater.

 

Quote

Leftard media somehow failed to notice that the car that tore through the Charlottesville crowd was hit by a guy with a bat right before he sped off. There's video of it on Youtube, but somehow CNN never saw it. 

 

LOL not content with dickriding convicted murderer ex-pig Derek "Pincushion" Chauvin, you're now jumping on a neo-Nazi's lap with a video that shows him racing his car towards a crowd of people and someone hitting the car to try and stop him? Stick to something you're good at like eating shit.

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

WTF else would they call it? 

A terrorist attack, just like the one in Charlottesville, dummy.

Quote

The media not reporting on stuff at the time of the crash that wasn't known at that time is not evidence of a cover up, shiteater.

The whole point is that the media had an entirely different standard for an attack that was from a leftist/BLMer/black racist than they did from a white racist. 

There was no more evidence in one instance than the other, but one was a terrorist and one was just a guy in a car crash. 

Quote

LOL not content with dickriding convicted murderer ex-pig Derek "Pincushion" Chauvin, you're now jumping on a neo-Nazi's lap with a video that shows him racing his car towards a crowd of people and someone hitting the car to try and stop him? Stick to something you're good at like eating shit.

I don't choose what evidence is out there you illiterate racist, I just lay out the facts because that's the proper thing to do.

I never said that the guy who ran the people over in Charlottesville should get out of jail, I just said that 'at least there's evidence in his case that he was actually running from something'. 

The Waukesha terrorist wasn't running from anything, he was just running over people.