Will there be a second debate?

[User]

2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

its just a prediction... do you understand that? It really does not matter.. I do not need to watch them. No new information will be obtained. 

You said probably... 

I understand what you write. If you meant that you were just randomly throwing numbers out with no reasoning what-so-ever, you should have said so. 
 

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, User said:

You said probably... 

I understand what you write. If you meant that you were just randomly throwing numbers out with no reasoning what-so-ever, you should have said so. 
 

its a prediction.. so inherently subjective and could be right or wrong. If you do not like what I post.. you could do the grown up thing and just keep scrolling. Wait... that is expecting too much of an adult. 

[Nationalist]

On 6/30/2024 at 6:28 PM, robosmith said:

Like I said, you got BUPKIS. Changing jobs is not evidence of ANYTHING. Could be a dozen different reasons.

Maybe Colangelo just had a personal desire to make sure it was done right.

I don't need more than there already is.

The dye is already cast. The public already know the truth, no matter how much you Tweenkies deny it.

Enjoy the election.

[User]

4 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

its a prediction.. so inherently subjective and could be right or wrong. If you do not like what I post.. you could do the grown up thing and just keep scrolling. Wait... that is expecting too much of an adult. 

Look up the definition of probably. 

If you wanted to use the word predict, you should have led with that to begin with. 

I am just an impartial observer here of what you write. 

[impartialobserver]

2 minutes ago, User said:

Look up the definition of probably. 

If you wanted to use the word predict, you should have led with that to begin with. 

I am just an impartial observer here of what you write. 

Probability and prediction are intertwined... If you say probably this will happen, you are saying that you predict that it will happen. Each is inherently subjective.. But if you want to play stupid and waste someone else's time.. plenty of chances for you to do so. 

in advance.. you get the last word. as a reward, what would be your prize? A lollipop. 

Edited July 2, 2024 by impartialobserver

[User]

25 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Probability and prediction are intertwined... If you say probably this will happen, you are saying that you predict that it will happen. Each is inherently subjective.. But if you want to play stupid and waste someone else's time.. plenty of chances for you to do so. 

in advance.. you get the last word. as a reward, what would be your prize? A lollipop. 

Stupid and wasting peoples time is your "predicting" there will be a few more debates when all available evidence is to the contrary. 

 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

Probably will be a few more later on in the year (Sept and Oct.) Each will be just as uninspiring and pointless as this last one. 

Sounds like someone's bitter about his side losing

There's no chance that there will be more than one additional debate. And in fact there's not a great chance there will even be one additional debate. And this debate probably decided the election, to call it boring is dishonest.

Here's a clue for you. Whenever anybody takes the time to pick up pen and write about how boring something is and how disinterested they are, it's pretty much proof positive that they were interested and they aren't bored but that they don't like what's happening. When normal people are actually bored about something they just don't pay attention to it or write about it.