robosmith Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 (edited) GOP Judges protecting Trump show us what weaponizing the justice system really looks like! Quote This is judicial corruption at it's worst! We’ve never seen such a brazen effort by Republican appointed judges to protect the GOP’s political power as we are seeing play out right in front of our eyes with Donald Trump’s three remaining criminal cases. They are not even trying to hide their efforts to help convicted felon Trump win in 2024 by delaying his criminal cases so that their presidential nominee is not convicted of even more felonies before the November election. That brings us to the Republican controlled US Supreme Court that is nothing more of an arm of the GOP when it comes to political related cases. And we are seeing that again with the Court delaying Trump’s Jan 6 case where he faces four very serious felonies including conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding and conspiracy to defraud the United State for his illegal efforts to remain in office despite losing the 2020 election. As a reminder, Special Counsel Jack Smith first asked the Supreme Court on December 11, 2023 to hear Trump’s appeal of the trial judge’s ruling he has no immunity for the crimes he committed while in office. At the time, Smith argued this was an extraordinary case that demanded swift attention. But the GOP controlled court agreed with Trump’s argument, refusing the direct appeal. As a result, the case went to the US Court of Appeals, which rendered a decision on February 6 that Trump has no immunity. Despite the obvious urgency of this case given the man who attempted a coup was the likely 2024 GOP presidential nominee, the GOP justices delayed for nearly three weeks a decision on whether to hear the appeal. Finally, they took the case on an expedited basis and scheduled oral argument for April 25. Yet hear we are nearly seven weeks since that oral argument with no decision—meaning Trump’s Jan 6 case remains on hold. In glaring contrast, earlier this year when the Supreme Court considered whether to bar Trump from the ballot for engaging in an insurrection in violation of the 14th Amendment—a case of first impression—the court quickly ruled in Trump’s favor in just a little over three weeks after the February 8 oral argument. So when a speedy decision helps Trump, they deliver it—and when a delay helps Trump, they deliver that as well. Again, they are not hiding their partisan agenda. If you want an even more extreme example of how quickly GOP Justices will move when they sense a chance to help Republicans gain power, check out the infamous Bush v. Gore decision. Just one day after oral arguments in that case, the five Republican Justices joined forces to effectively declare George W. Bush the winner of the 2000 election. As a reminder, three of the current GOP justices worked as lawyers on Bush’s legal team: John Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh. That means these three know first-hand how quickly the Supreme Court can move. This is what political weaponization of the justice system really looks like. These judges are political operatives in black robes. And the only remedy to this brazen judicial corruption is to win in 2024—and to win big! There is a LAW REQUIRING JoSCOTUS RECUSAL when a case involves THEIR WIFE, but these JoSCOTUS are defying that law with IMPUNITY. Edited June 14 by robosmith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 3 hours ago, robosmith said: GOP Judges protecting Trump show us what weaponizing the justice system really looks like! There is a LAW REQUIRING JoSCOTUS RECUSAL when a case involves THEIR WIFE, but these JoSCOTUS are defying that law with IMPUNITY. Lol...enjoy the election... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatomontes99 Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 Lmao, all your link does is open another window to this thread. And you opinion piece is by a guy that doesn't know the difference between hear and here. Desperate times...amiright? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 14 Author Report Share Posted June 14 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Lmao, all your link does is open another window to this thread. And you opinion piece is by a guy that doesn't know the difference between hear and here. Desperate times...amiright? Check it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffypants Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 11 hours ago, robosmith said: GOP Judges protecting Trump show us what weaponizing the justice system really looks like! There is a LAW REQUIRING JoSCOTUS RECUSAL when a case involves THEIR WIFE, but these JoSCOTUS are defying that law with IMPUNITY. You can never talk any of sources ever again since you just presented a blog by an ultra left wing radio host. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 14 Author Report Share Posted June 14 2 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: You can never talk any of sources ever again since you just presented a blog by an ultra left wing radio host. How about you TRY to refute any/all of the points he made? Are you claiming they're ALL errors? Claiming one source you don't like, disqualifies every other I might cite is JUST RIDICULOUS. Since that is YOUR STANDARD, yours are all disqualified. It's NOT my standard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatomontes99 Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 3 hours ago, robosmith said: Check it again. Lol...the article laments that the judges are following the law while being unable to edit for proper word use. What does this have to do with anything? There is a guy with TDS that is made that judges don't adhear to his fantasies? Who cares? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 14 hours ago, robosmith said: There is a LAW REQUIRING JoSCOTUS RECUSAL when a case involves THEIR WIFE, but these JoSCOTUS are defying that law with IMPUNITY. What are you talking about? What case involved a Supreme Court Justice wife that they did not recuse themselves from? I swear, you spam this forum with this nonsense and then run away from most of it when you are called out for making ignorant comments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 So they protect a private citizens Civil rights from Garlands malicious prosecutions and now they are the issue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffypants Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 13 minutes ago, West said: So they protect a private citizens Civil rights from Garlands malicious prosecutions and now they are the issue This is why you don't just go after a presidential candidate during an election year because no matter what happens it looks politically motivated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 14 Author Report Share Posted June 14 48 minutes ago, User said: What are you talking about? What case involved a Supreme Court Justice wife that they did not recuse themselves from? Ginni Thomas was at the Capitol for the insurrection and texting about Democrats being sent to Gitmo with Mark Meadows. Clarence Thomas has refused to recuse. Now Alito is flying TWO inssurection flags, blaming his wife and refusing to recuse. Now you know. You're welcome. 48 minutes ago, User said: I swear, you spam this forum with this nonsense and then run away from most of it when you are called out for making ignorant comments. I just IGNORE YOUR IGNORANT posts. Don't like it? Think BEFORE posting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 14 Author Report Share Posted June 14 17 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: This is why you don't just go after a presidential candidate during an election year because no matter what happens it looks politically motivated. How it "looks" is irrelevant to the administration of JUSTICE, no matter how much you want to DEFLECT from the RESULTS. Apparently you haven't heard that Trump filed early to MAKE IT LOOK POLITICAL. Duh 36 minutes ago, West said: So they protect a private citizens Civil rights from Garlands malicious prosecutions and now they are the issue They don't protect anything except the public's right to know BEFORE the election, by delaying the trials. 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: Lol...the article laments that the judges are following the law while being unable to edit for proper word use. What does this have to do with anything? There is a guy with TDS that is made that judges don't adhear to his fantasies? Who cares? What does ^this BULLSHIT have to do with anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 12 minutes ago, robosmith said: Ginni Thomas was at the Capitol for the insurrection and texting about Democrats being sent to Gitmo with Mark Meadows. Clarence Thomas has refused to recuse. Now Alito is flying TWO inssurection flags, blaming his wife and refusing to recuse. Now you know. You're welcome. You claimed: "There is a LAW REQUIRING JoSCOTUS RECUSAL when a case involves THEIR WIFE" Ginni Thomas is not part of any case before the Court. Alito was not flying any flags, nor are they insurrection flags. Again, nothing here demands he recuse himself. I already knew you were posting garbage, the questions were mostly rhetorical hoping you would have enough decency to admit your lies. 15 minutes ago, robosmith said: I just IGNORE YOUR IGNORANT posts. Don't like it? Think BEFORE posting. No, you run away when you are backed into a corner for the lies and crap you post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.