gatomontes99 Posted June 12, 2024 Report Posted June 12, 2024 The Republican-controlled House voted Wednesday to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress — a politically charged broadside against the Biden administration that comes a day after Garland’s Justice Department won a conviction against Biden’s son Hunter on felony gun charges. About time. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
West Posted June 12, 2024 Report Posted June 12, 2024 When can we expect to see this crazy guy in handcuffs? 1 Quote
robosmith Posted June 12, 2024 Report Posted June 12, 2024 37 minutes ago, West said: When can we expect to see this crazy guy in handcuffs? Only AFTER Garland decides to prosecute himself for contempt. LMAO Contempt for not releasing the audio of Biden's testimony so RepubliCONS can use it in campaign ads is a complete joke. 1 1 Quote
West Posted June 12, 2024 Report Posted June 12, 2024 23 minutes ago, robosmith said: Only AFTER Garland decides to prosecute himself for contempt. LMAO Contempt for not releasing the audio of Biden's testimony so RepubliCONS can use it in campaign ads is a complete joke. So Garland is above the law. Very pathetic 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted June 12, 2024 Author Report Posted June 12, 2024 2 minutes ago, West said: So Garland is above the law. Very pathetic Remember, "NO one (on the right) is above the law!" Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted June 12, 2024 Report Posted June 12, 2024 3 minutes ago, West said: So Garland is above the law. Very pathetic His contempt is completely justified by the RepubliCON clown car. Quote
West Posted June 12, 2024 Report Posted June 12, 2024 1 minute ago, robosmith said: His contempt is completely justified by the RepubliCON clown car. Garland should've respected the congressional subpoena and not acted like he's above the law Quote
robosmith Posted June 12, 2024 Report Posted June 12, 2024 1 minute ago, West said: Garland should've respected the congressional subpoena and not acted like he's above the law You should write him a letter and tell him to fall in line because you say so. LMAO BTW, Biden has invoked executive privilege to deny the release to the audio, so the RepubliCONS can GPS. Maybe Garland should reconsider prosecuting Gym Jordan for defying HIS House subpoena. Quote
West Posted June 12, 2024 Report Posted June 12, 2024 Just now, robosmith said: You should write him a letter and tell him to fall in line because you say so. LMAO BTW, Biden has invoked executive privilege to deny the release to the audio, so the RepubliCONS can GPS. Maybe Garland should reconsider prosecuting Gym Jordan for defying HIS House subpoena. So Biden is covering up? Sad. Quote
robosmith Posted June 12, 2024 Report Posted June 12, 2024 2 minutes ago, West said: So Biden is covering up? Sad. Yeah, he's "covering up" the sound of his voice, so RepubliCONS can't use it in their campaign ads. GPS Quote
West Posted June 12, 2024 Report Posted June 12, 2024 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: Yeah, he's "covering up" the sound of his voice, so RepubliCONS can't use it in their campaign ads. GPS The transcript of the call was edited. Biden claims executive priviledge but the transcript is already out there. Very shady guy.. 1 Quote
Hodad Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 Sorry to the silly Republican showboaters, but contempt of Congress for an executive privilege case is a non-starter. The smarter among them know that, but they're betting that they can gin to outage about the ignorant base. Sadly, they're right. But no need to entertain it here. 1 Quote
User Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 3 hours ago, robosmith said: Only AFTER Garland decides to prosecute himself for contempt. LMAO Contempt for not releasing the audio of Biden's testimony so RepubliCONS can use it in campaign ads is a complete joke. So... Garland is withholding material from Congress to play politics for Biden... Do you think that makes it better? LOL 1 Quote
Aristides Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Remember, "NO one (on the right) is above the law!" Trump is saying presidents are above the law. Quote
User Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 20 minutes ago, Hodad said: Sorry to the silly Republican showboaters, but contempt of Congress for an executive privilege case is a non-starter. The smarter among them know that, but they're betting that they can gin to outage about the ignorant base. Sadly, they're right. But no need to entertain it here. Executive privilege... for what? They are not magic words that are simply uttered and make everything OK. 1 Quote
Aristides Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 (edited) 2 hours ago, West said: So Biden is covering up? Sad. What is he covering up? Hur determined Biden didn't break the law. Edited June 13, 2024 by Aristides Quote
West Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 1 hour ago, Aristides said: Trump is saying presidents are above the law. Biden thinks he's above a subpoena 1 hour ago, Aristides said: What is he covering up? Hur determined Biden didn't break the law. They altered the transcript. Quote
Aristides Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 17 minutes ago, West said: Biden thinks he's above a subpoena Trump and his cronies set the precedent for that. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-failed-comply-with-jan-6-committee-subpoena-panel-says-2022-11-14/ https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/07/us/politics/jan-6-subpoenas.html Quote They altered the transcript. If the transcript is public, what is being withheld? 1 Quote
West Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 24 minutes ago, Aristides said: Trump and his cronies set the precedent for that. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-failed-comply-with-jan-6-committee-subpoena-panel-says-2022-11-14/ https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/07/us/politics/jan-6-subpoenas.html If the transcript is public, what is being withheld? The transcript was altered. So we would like to find out Quote
robosmith Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 3 hours ago, User said: So... Garland is withholding material from Congress to play politics for Biden... Do you think that makes it better? LOL Garland explained why he's withholding the AUDIO. Maybe you should try reading what he said. 3 hours ago, User said: Executive privilege... for what? They are not magic words that are simply uttered and make everything OK. Sorry, but your opinion on executive privilege means NOTHING. Quote
robosmith Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 1 hour ago, West said: Biden thinks he's above a subpoena Biden isn't being subpoenaed. Duh 1 hour ago, West said: They altered the transcript. ^BULLSHIT. There was NO substantive editing and you have ZERO evidence there was. 1 Quote
User Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Garland explained why he's withholding the AUDIO. Maybe you should try reading what he said. I was responding to your excuse here. So, were you just making that up? 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: Sorry, but your opinion on executive privilege means NOTHING. I asked a question. Are you unfamiliar with how those work? Quote
robosmith Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 1 hour ago, West said: The transcript was altered. So we would like to find out "we"? LMAO You're an lDIOT. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 1 minute ago, User said: I was responding to your excuse here. So, were you just making that up? I asked a question. Are you unfamiliar with how those work? You seem to be, because you forgot the question mark in your "question." Quote "They are not magic words that are simply uttered and make everything OK." ^Not a question. Quote
User Posted June 13, 2024 Report Posted June 13, 2024 16 minutes ago, robosmith said: You seem to be, because you forgot the question mark in your "question." "Executive privilege... for what?" <--------------------- QUESTION MARK 17 minutes ago, robosmith said: ^Not a question. So you think they are magic words that are uttered and make everything OK? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.