At Least the Fani Willis Case Against Trump Has a Reasonable Judge

[ironstone]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

If Alan Dershowitz is “no fan of Trump,” why did he serve as Trump’s defense council during Trump’s first impeachment? 

I think it's extremely common for defense lawyers to represent clients they don't like. And no matter what we may think of defendants, they are entitled to legal representation and the presumption of innocence.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

If Alan Dershowitz is “no fan of Trump,” why did he serve as Trump’s defense council during Trump’s first impeachment? 

Like a lot of defense lawyers, Douchowitz loves high profile cases, esp when he wins, to greatly expand his client base.

Preventing Trump's conviction in the Senate was a slam dunk cause the jury was self-interested in his acquittal..

[ironstone]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Ok, exactly what DA's were "George Soros funded" and where is YOUR EVIDENCE of that?

https://nypost.com/2021/12/16/how-george-soros-funded-progressive-das-behind-us-crime-surge/

https://whyy.org/articles/soros-weighed-in-with-even-more-money-in-das-race/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/the-soros-backlash-how-the-nation-has-turned-against-soft-on-crime-prosecutors/ar-BB1iFtmo

Soros has funded a lot of DA's over many years.

[robosmith]

10 minutes ago, ironstone said:

https://nypost.com/2021/12/16/how-george-soros-funded-progressive-das-behind-us-crime-surge/

https://whyy.org/articles/soros-weighed-in-with-even-more-money-in-das-race/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/the-soros-backlash-how-the-nation-has-turned-against-soft-on-crime-prosecutors/ar-BB1iFtmo

Soros has funded a lot of DA's over many years.

The subject which YOU QUOTED is Fani Willis and you FAILED to quote ANYTHING from your cites which states Soros funded any of the Fulton County attorneys involved in that case.

BTW, two of your cites are NYP which has no more credibility than the National Enquirer.

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Unfortunate that you have NO EVIDENCE she LIED and don't even specify what YOU BELIEVE the lie is.

Meanwhile you PROVE LIES don't bother YOU at ALL because you worship the most dishonest AND pathological LIAR to ever occupy the WH.

There is STILL a list of 30,000+ lies of which you've not refuted even ONE.  

You have no room to talk about LIES bothering ANYONE.

Gawd you're a loser. 

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

If Alan Dershowitz is “no fan of Trump,” why did he serve as Trump’s defense council during Trump’s first impeachment? 

Money? Justice? 

Dummy. 

[Hodad]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

She's not a "pit bull", she's a liar and a sneaky ho. 

You know that, I know that, and everyone in North America with a TV or an internet connection knows that.

If you really wanted a guilty verdict (let's not pretend that you want actual justice or anything), you'd want to have a respectable, professional prosecutor and not someone who's known to be a liar. 

I know that, as a leftist, the fact that someone is a liar doesn't bother you at all, but a lot of people still care. Any reasonable person will have to take into account the fact that Willis is a liar every time she speaks. Every word she says and every bit of 'evidence' she provides will be tainted by that. 

🤪"Fani Willis is a liar!" (without proof) and "It didn't rain during Trump's inauguration speech!"

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Gawd you're a loser. 

You're the one with BUBKIS. No need to call me childish names just cause you're BANKRUPT.

[robosmith]

52 minutes ago, Hodad said:

🤪"Fani Willis is a liar!" (without proof) and "It didn't rain during Trump's inauguration speech!"

WCM easily mistakes "lacks credibility" with "proven liar" except when it's 30,000+ documented alleged lies by Trump.

Then they're all proven "true" with one allegation that was proven to be a LIE.

[WestCanMan]

On 3/18/2024 at 3:43 PM, Hodad said:

🤪"Fani Willis is a liar!" (without proof) and "It didn't rain during Trump's inauguration speech!"

If you're unaware of the sad Fani Willis saga, good for you. 

If you think that the 50 droplets of "rain during Trump's inauguration speech" was really worth accusations of Trump "lying", and you haven't noticed the severity and frequency of Biden's lies about things like Hunter's lucrative partnership with the Chinese gov't, inflation, the border, covid, drone-struck children, etc, then just go ahead and live in your insipid little bubble, fool. 

On 3/18/2024 at 4:38 PM, robosmith said:

WCM easily mistakes "lacks credibility" with "proven liar" except when it's 30,000+ documented alleged lies by Trump.

Then they're all proven "true" with one allegation that was proven to be a LIE.

Buddy, all 30,000 lies were false. you never found a single one worth mentioning. "Raindropgate", your shining example of a Trump lie, was just a CNN/Demi tantrum, nothing more. 

[robosmith]

On 3/23/2024 at 10:58 AM, WestCanMan said:

If you're unaware of the sad Fani Willis saga, good for you. 

If you think that the 50 droplets of "rain during Trump's inauguration speech" was really worth accusations of Trump "lying", and you haven't noticed the severity and frequency of Biden's lies about things like Hunter's lucrative partnership with the Chinese gov't, inflation, the border, covid, drone-struck children, etc, then just go ahead and live in your insipid little bubble, fool. 

There were many more than 50 drops on Obama's chair back. Duh.

On 3/23/2024 at 10:58 AM, WestCanMan said:

Buddy, all 30,000 lies were false. you never found a single one worth mentioning. "Raindropgate", your shining example of a Trump lie, was just a CNN/Demi tantrum, nothing more. 

"Raindropgate", was the example YOU CHOSE cause you thought Trump's hair didn't get wet.

Then you lamely try to minimize ALL the OTHER EVIDENCE of rain. Face REALITY WCM, it rained and because it did, all the other 30,000+ lie allegations are just as credible, and YOU ARE NOT.