THE DEMOCRAT PARTY – A DEMONIC CULT OF DEATH

[Deluge]

I've found this to be an interesting read and it provides a deeper explanation to all the filth that swirls around this group of abortion loving psychopaths.  

"THE DEMOCRAT PARTY – A DEMONIC CULT OF DEATH

An Open Letter to Democrats and the Fake News Liberal Media on why they are a Cult of Death, a Tool of the Devil and of Antichrist, as well as a Clear and Present Danger to the Nation.

This is an updated and expanded letter that I originally wrote and sent out to hundreds of political organizations and institutions during the 2016 Election. I have updated it in response to President Biden’s recent divisive and demonic speech and his attack upon Christian virtues and Republican values. It is also in the form of a polemical sermon lecture in rebuke of the demonic agenda of the Democrat party and a warning to the churches and the nation."

https://emmanuelgrace.org/politics/the-democrat-party-a-demonic-death-cult/

[WestCanMan]

They're definitely a cult, and I'm not a fan of religion, but sadly, this is an apt assessment of the Dems:

“The Devil is as a thief who does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy."

Pus there's:

• Over 50 million unborn children have been slaughtered in abortion mills as a direct result of the Democrat party and the ruling of Roe v. Wade in 1973
• Spicy.... "Thousands of Black Americans and Hispanic folk are murdered every year because of the perverse and racist policies of Democrat city politicians. In fact, since the 1960’s over 700,000 people (largely minorities) have been murdered by gun violence that is a direct result of Democrat policies and their death cult which are designed to undermine law and order as well as public respect for law enforcement officers."
• Covid-19 was a criminal conspiracy, of demonic proportions that was long in planning, and concocted by a number of western globalist elites from several different but overlapping groups directly related to the Democrat party; including Klaus Schwab and the WHO, the Bill Gates Foundation, the Obama-Biden administrations, the Deep State bureaucracy, the CDC, the DOD, and big pharma including Pfizer.

I finished skimming it right there. The last point makes sense - more sense than the currently accepted story of covid/vaxes/origin, etc - but I'm still not there personally.

I think this is worthwhile as a topic, something to consider, but I don't believe it. I just think it's sad that there's enough evidence to open up the debate. 

[WestCanMan]

This is like a laser-pointer shining directly on the Dems' banner: 

• *Proverbs 6:16-19 “These six things the Lord hates, Yes, seven are an abomination to Him: a proud look, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that are swift in running to evil, a false witness who speaks lies, and one who sows discord among brethren.” 

Personally I'd go with 6, and ditch the "proud look" part, but when that was written the meaning of proud might have been more in line with arrogant or smug. 

I don't think anyone epitomizes the word smug more than our smarmy little bastard of a PM. 

[godzilla]

talk about extreme views. you know you have extreme views. extreme views are always devoid of facts and heavy on beliefs.

 

[Deluge]

1 minute ago, godzilla said:

talk about extreme views. you know you have extreme views. extreme views are always devoid of facts and heavy on beliefs.

 

Sounds like the democrat party. 

Well said, comrade.

[Deluge]

21 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

They're definitely a cult, and I'm not a fan of religion, but sadly, this is an apt assessment of the Dems:

“The Devil is as a thief who does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy."

Pus there's:

• Over 50 million unborn children have been slaughtered in abortion mills as a direct result of the Democrat party and the ruling of Roe v. Wade in 1973
• Spicy.... "Thousands of Black Americans and Hispanic folk are murdered every year because of the perverse and racist policies of Democrat city politicians. In fact, since the 1960’s over 700,000 people (largely minorities) have been murdered by gun violence that is a direct result of Democrat policies and their death cult which are designed to undermine law and order as well as public respect for law enforcement officers."
• Covid-19 was a criminal conspiracy, of demonic proportions that was long in planning, and concocted by a number of western globalist elites from several different but overlapping groups directly related to the Democrat party; including Klaus Schwab and the WHO, the Bill Gates Foundation, the Obama-Biden administrations, the Deep State bureaucracy, the CDC, the DOD, and big pharma including Pfizer.

I finished skimming it right there. The last point makes sense - more sense than the currently accepted story of covid/vaxes/origin, etc - but I'm still not there personally.

I think this is worthwhile as a topic, something to consider, but I don't believe it. I just think it's sad that there's enough evidence to open up the debate. 

It's difficult to not believe. We've all seen how insidious these a$$holes can get. Democrats are always running interference on every f*cking point that's brought up. I've never seen ANY of these cultists concede a point; they just stop in their tracks and start working another angle. lol

[godzilla]

11 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Sounds like the democrat party. 

Well said, comrade.

in what way... exactly?

[Deluge]

7 minutes ago, godzilla said:

in what way... exactly?

Everything political. 

Let's check it out. 

Tell me something you firmly believe in. 

Edited January 30, 2024 by Deluge

[WestCanMan]

34 minutes ago, godzilla said:

talk about extreme views. you know you have extreme views. extreme views are always devoid of facts and heavy on beliefs.

Buddy, go look at the laundry list of posts you wrote that titillated the likes of robo, hodad, eyeball, etc...

This thread is firmly grounded in reality by comparison to your most sensible thread ever. 

[godzilla]

13 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Everything political. 

Let's check it out. 

Tell me something you firmly believe in. 

i already took your political test. you never got back to me whether i was an "extreme leftist" or a "moderate".

[godzilla]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Buddy, go look at the laundry list of posts you wrote that titillated the likes of robo, hodad, eyeball, etc...

This thread is firmly grounded in reality by comparison to your most sensible thread ever. 

hey, you wont' believe anything you read unless it's framed in hate of an invisible enemy.

you are extreme. because everyone else, to you, are extreme. only those that support your exact belief system are extreme. its a lens that you may never shake.

all issues are conversations. conversations that need to be held by adults that respect each other as people and don't immediately jump to some ideological blueprint.

and its about focus. there are school boards in the US now under attack for single pages in books. school boards where people have spent a lifetime in a career doing nothing that was previously controversial... suddenly being forced out of jobs that they were committed to for a lifetime because, out of 50k books in the library making up maybe 5 million pages, a small number of people with extreme beliefs who don't even have children are concerned about 1 of those million pages.

thats the end of liberal democracy. yes, LIBERAL.

Liberalism

"Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property and equality before the law.^"

[Deluge]

16 minutes ago, godzilla said:

i already took your political test. you never got back to me whether i was an "extreme leftist" or a "moderate".

You're 80% extreme leftist, 20% Right. That makes you more left-wing extreme than anything else. 

Back to what you believe in. Go ahead and list something here. 

[godzilla]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

You're 80% extreme leftist, 20% Right. That makes you more left-wing extreme than anything else. 

Back to what you believe in. Go ahead and list something here. 

what was "extreme" about any of my positions? maybe pick the most egregious of them...

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

They're definitely a cult, and I'm not a fan of religion, but sadly, this is an apt assessment of the Dems:

“The Devil is as a thief who does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy."

Pus there's:

• Over 50 million unborn children have been slaughtered in abortion mills as a direct result of the Democrat party and the ruling of Roe v. Wade in 1973

Are you really so ignorant you don't know that the SCOTUS which decided RvW in 1973 7to2 was majority Republican appointed? Only 3 of the Justices were appointed by Democrats. Duh

[Deluge]

4 minutes ago, godzilla said:

what was "extreme" about any of my positions? maybe pick the most egregious of them...

ALL but two are extreme. Choose where you disagree and we'll go over it. 

Edited January 30, 2024 by Deluge

[Deluge]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Are you really so ignorant you don't know that the SCOTUS which decided RvW in 1973 7to2 was majority Republican appointed? Only 3 of the Justices were appointed by Democrats. Duh

The 1973 SCOTUS was misguided. Thankfully the 2022 SCOTUS got it right. 

[WestCanMan]

13 minutes ago, godzilla said:

hey, you wont' believe anything you read unless it's framed in hate of an invisible enemy.

All I do is consider things that can be proven, or are grounded in common sense, fool.

Facts, stats and logic are your kryptonite. 

Basically any opinion, narrative, belief or alleged fact you have expressed in the past 5 years was disproven, debunked, or exposed. 

There's no invisible enemy godzi, I see you leftards just fine. 

[robosmith]

47 minutes ago, Deluge said:

The 1973 SCOTUS was misguided. 

They were WELL GUIDED BY PRAGMATISM.

Were you even alive in 1973?

Laws don't stop abortions for desperate women, they only stop SAFE abortions. 🤮

46 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

There's no invisible enemy godzi, I see you leftards just fine. 

You even see them when they're not there, like on the 1973 SCOTUS. LMAO

[Deluge]

9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

1. They were WELL GUIDED BY PRAGMATISM.

2. Were you even alive in 1973?

3. Laws don't stop abortions for desperate women, they only stop SAFE abortions. 🤮

1. Wrong. They were duped by fetus slaughtering liars. 

2. That's irrelevant to this debate. 

3. Laws are made to be followed, and if you break them then there are penalties.

[godzilla]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

All I do is consider things that can be proven, or are grounded in common sense, fool.

Facts, stats and logic are your kryptonite. 

Basically any opinion, narrative, belief or alleged fact you have expressed in the past 5 years was disproven, debunked, or exposed. 

There's no invisible enemy godzi, I see you leftards just fine. 

all righty then! shall we? because i have lots of questions that MAGA fans can't seem to answer. you're "logic" and "facts" will fail you.

1. what about this plot that Trump cooked up to have illegal slates of electors send illegal documents to the Senate. then have GOP senators argue that the existence of these documents should prevent the transfer of power with Trump pressuring Pence as VP to prevent the transfer of power.

is this illegal? if not then will it be ok if Biden does it too?

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, godzilla said:

all righty then! shall we? because i have lots of questions that MAGA fans can't seem to answer. you're "logic" and "facts" will fail you.

1. what about this plot that Trump cooked up to have illegal slates of electors send illegal documents to the Senate. then have GOP senators argue that the existence of these documents should prevent the transfer of power with Trump pressuring Pence as VP to prevent the transfer of power.

is this illegal? if not then will it be ok if Biden does it too?

Well if it is illegal that will be tested in court and a judge will have to make that determination.

If it's legal then sure biden can, if its' not legal than no he shouldn't.

Seems pretty simple

[godzilla]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well if it is illegal that will be tested in court and a judge will have to make that determination.

If it's legal then sure biden can, if its' not legal than no he shouldn't.

Seems pretty simple

perfect. but here's the rub... if its legal then Biden can prevent Trump from coming to power. If he can't do that then its illegal. if its illegal then... Trump will be convicted.

so actually, whether its legal or illegal... its all bad news for Trump.

[CdnFox]

Just now, godzilla said:

perfect. but here's the rub... if its legal then Biden can prevent Trump from coming to power. If he can't do that then its illegal. if its illegal then... Trump will be convicted.

so actually, whether its legal or illegal... its all bad news for Trump.

Up to a point.  The effort failed - what we're discussing is was it legal for him to try. Remember it didn't happen, things proceeded normally.

So - in fact it might not be illegal for biden to try but he may still not be able to sink trump that way.

And we aren't likely to find out what the judge says before the election, so if trump does take it then it'll be moot.

[godzilla]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Up to a point.  The effort failed - what we're discussing is was it legal for him to try. Remember it didn't happen, things proceeded normally.

So - in fact it might not be illegal for biden to try but he may still not be able to sink trump that way.

And we aren't likely to find out what the judge says before the election, so if trump does take it then it'll be moot.

but you avoid the question, should preventing the transfer of power be illegal for a president? you seem to be implying that even if it is, conspiracy to do so should not be.

wonder if you can come up with any other activities in attempting to commit felonies that in US law are not felony conspiracies? there's a fun challenge for you! because i suspect there aren't any.

and finally, lets say that its not illegal to try. Biden has electors from all states sent. Harris comes down and recognizes only the Biden electors. all done. now i know what some will say... "but then there would be civil war". is there something wrong with that? is it only ok if Trump does it. because thats where we've been for a long time. it's only ok if Trump does it. as he asserts... he alone is immune.

[CdnFox]

58 minutes ago, godzilla said:

but you avoid the question, should preventing the transfer of power be illegal for a president? you seem to be implying that even if it is, conspiracy to do so should not be.

I think you're moving some goalposts around a bit there   Your original question was much more specific.

Then answer to this one is not if it's done legally    I mean it depends on what you mean. 

First off - the electoral college vote and the count and such has NOTHING to do with the transfer of power.  And it's not the first time the results were contested in some way. So - your question is faulty on the face of it. 

Consider for example the nighmare a few years back over the hanging chads. If there is some question as to the outcome of an election it is not unreasonable. It was like 5 weeks of fighting with lawyers and everything with neither party conceding, and the US on pins and needles  wondering who the next president would be.

Was that illegal? No - there is nothing illegal about challenging the results.  Did the transfer of power still happen once the issue was resolved? Yes.

You need to stop being so partisan and think these things through a bit more before you present your questions.

58 minutes ago, godzilla said:

wonder if you can come up with any other activities in attempting to commit felonies that in US law are not felony conspiracies?

What? that made no sense.  "activities" in attempting to commit a 'felony' that isn't a 'felony'?  If it's not a felony then it isn't a felony. Reword that in english and i'll take a crack at it

Quote

nd finally, lets say that its not illegal to try. Biden has electors from all states sent. Harris comes down and recognizes only the Biden electors. all done. now i know what some will say... "but then there would be civil war". is there something wrong with that? is it only ok if Trump does it. because thats where we've been for a long time. it's only ok if Trump does it. as he asserts... he alone is immune.

You really need to write better, it is brutally hard to understand what you're trying to say.  So - if i guess correctly you're asking "if biden attempted to change the college voters would that be ok'?  Well probably not, it didn't work when trump did it and i suspect the colleges would complain as they did this time and that would be the end of it. 

Edited January 30, 2024 by CdnFox