The Economist: Trump Poses the Biggest Danger to the World in 2024

[CdnFox]

9 hours ago, robosmith said:

The law is not being "warped" just because you don't know about the EVIDENCE. Duh

Well of course it's being warped. It's been deliberately misused and has been for 7 years now.   Dems and their supporters twist the law out of shape to weaponize it to go after trump.

That's beyond obvious - and the reports into the fbi activities show that clearly, and the current charges make that pretty clear as well.  A small handful are legit, the vast majority are simply attempts to attack trump and keep him away from the presidency. Anybody with half a brain and a little neutrality can see that.

And I would be surprised if trump DIDN'T look for payback if he gets in. Probably spend 4 years appointing people to investigate specific individuals for the slightest hint of wrongdoing and then prosecuting them. Which of course is what theyv'e done to him.

I can see why the dems are petrified.

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

The law has been warped and its going to bite you limp noodles before this is over.

Will anyone sympathize? I know I won't.

Why should anyone believe the legal opinions of a college dropout from Canada who ONLY gets his info from right wing propaganda outlets?

I know I don't.

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Why should anyone believe the legal opinions of a college dropout from Canada who ONLY gets his info from right wing propaganda outlets?

I know I don't.

I'm not surprised...

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Why should anyone believe the legal opinions of a college dropout from Canada who ONLY gets his info from right wing propaganda outlets?

I know I don't.

You're not from Canada, and your outlets are left wing.  And nobody does believe you so i dont know what you're complaining about,

Yeash - you don't even know what country your'e in.   

[robosmith]

23 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I'm not surprised...

... you have no reason. Nor am I.

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

... you have no reason. Nor am I.

Agreed - you have no reason that any of us can see.

[Legato]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

... you have no reason. Nor am I.

[robosmith]

16 minutes ago, Legato said:

Thanks for demonstrating you're unable to post anything more than a childish meme that carries no WEIGHT in rebutting an article from "The Economist."

Very sad that's the best you got. 

 

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for demonstrating you're unable to post anything more than a childish meme that carries no WEIGHT in rebutting an article from "The Economist."

Very sad that's the best you got. 

 

LOL - sounds like he struck a nerve   

[Legato]

49 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for demonstrating you're unable to post anything more than a childish meme that carries no WEIGHT in rebutting an article from "The Economist."

Very sad that's the best you got. 

 

Yes I know TDS is a great weight to bear. Even the Bears have shunned it because of the unbearable weight.

[Guest]

Just now, Legato said:

Yes I know TDS is a great weight to bear. Even the Bears have shunned it because of the unbearable weight.

[robosmith]

4 minutes ago, Legato said:

Yes I know TDS is a great weight to bear. Even the Bears have shunned it because of the unbearable weight.

You "know" crap.

[Legato]

12 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You "know" crap.

Ha yes a negative pejorative usually caused by stage 4 TDS.

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

You "know" crap.

Whereas you don't know crap   LOLOL

Walked into that one....

6 hours ago, Legato said:

Ha yes a negative pejorative usually caused by stage 4 TDS.

That's 20 mins of his life googling he'll never get back.

[Guest]

On 11/22/2023 at 4:32 PM, robosmith said:

 

You would have nailed the cartoon if dude in tuque had (they/their) fingernails painted, and the other guy had hair that matched his shirt.

Plot twist. Its a woman.

Biden was voted for, because Trump was seen as horrific.

Not something to brag about, like winning a participation trophy.

[robosmith]

35 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

You would have nailed the cartoon if dude in tuque had (they/their) fingernails painted, and the other guy had hair that matched his shirt.

Plot twist. Its a woman.

Woman with a beard. AKA, your ^OPINION.

35 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

Biden was voted for, because Trump was seen as horrific.

Not something to brag about, like winning a participation trophy.

He got more votes and that's all that matters, your ^OPINION notwithstanding.

[CdnFox]

55 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

You would have nailed the cartoon if dude in tuque had (they/their) fingernails painted, and the other guy had hair that matched his shirt.

Plot twist. Its a woman.

Biden was voted for, because Trump was seen as horrific.

Not something to brag about, like winning a participation trophy.

Honestly - i think trump just ran a really bad campaign and biden ran no campaign at all which looked good in comparison

Covid did weird things to elections all over. Sometimes it really paid off for the incumbent and other times it just shattered them.  It's been theorized that it tended to reward left wing parties more because when people don't know what is going to happen they tend to prefer gov'ts that are seen as being more nanny state - we'll take care of you don't you worry kind of gov'ts. 

Right now the focus is on the economy. If an election were called today and it was trump biden there's a much greater chance (chance mind you) that biden would lose and trump would win.

I suspect we'll get  a chance to see the rematch in 2024 and it should be a doozy.

[Guest]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

He got more votes and that's all that matters

Barely ?

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Perspektiv said:

Barely ?

Biden won the EC over Trump by the same margin as Trump won in 2016, PLUS Biden won the POPULAR VOTE by a much GREATER MARGIN than Hillary did.

Your "barely" means NOTHING.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

Barely ?

LOL - trump gets more votes -   "COLLUSION!!!! DOSSIER!! INVESTIGATION!!!  IMPEACH!!!!"

Biden gets more votes -  "well ... that's all that matters, i don't know why you guys don't get that"

[Guest]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Biden won the EC over Trump by the same margin as Trump won in 2016

Barely. Nothing to boast about. Trump lost this election based on his poor showing during covid.

Not because Biden was considered a better candidate. That's sad, regardless of how you choose to frame things. 

I don't even love Trump and can at least see that.

[robosmith]

12 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

Barely.

Nothing "barely" about it. EXACTLY the same EC margin, with much greater popular vote margin.

12 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

Nothing to boast about. Trump lost this election based on his poor showing during covid.

And that was TOTALLY HIS FAULT, because he put his (imagined) campaign interests above the health of our citizens.

It is HIGHLY likely had he dealt with the pandemic with concern for the people's' health, he would have been re elected.

12 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

Not because Biden was considered a better candidate. That's sad, regardless of how you choose to frame things. 

He was a better candidate. That's what getting more votes MEANS.

12 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

I don't even love Trump and can at least see that.

^Your OPINION, nothing more.

[Guest]

40 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nothing "barely" about it.

Trump lost that election.

Biden was a bad choice, but not as bad as a leader that has just mishandled covid.

54 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It is HIGHLY likely

Biden wouldn't have stood a chance. Anyone who needs to read from a teleprompter or needs handlers to get off stage will get mauled. 

Look at the middle east. Over 60 bombings against US interests. This is the "respect" that Biden gets. They're literally mocking him.

58 minutes ago, robosmith said:

He was a better candidate.

Was Trump a better candidate than Hillary Clinton?

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Perspektiv said:

Was Trump a better candidate than Hillary Clinton?

You mean without the ILLEGAL help from RUSSIA'S IRA? Doubtful.

Hillary suffered from overconfidence and exhaustion due to poor physical conditioning. Trump was clearly more energetic, but his margin was razor thin (<<1% in 3 states), so his ILLEGAL help from Russia was CRUCIAL to his "success."

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You mean without the ILLEGAL help from RUSSIA'S IRA? Doubtful.

Hillary suffered from overconfidence and exhaustion due to poor physical conditioning. Trump was clearly more energetic, but his margin was razor thin (<<1% in 3 states), so his ILLEGAL help from Russia was CRUCIAL to his "success."

ROFLMAO -   told you guys