The Honest Politician Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Link Interesting point of view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 The Honest Politician Link- Ignore! What's your point of view? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Honest Politician Posted January 4, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Harper = Bush lite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Circle Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 This coward Jayson from the link, offers up an email address for comments, and the address is no good. In the true form of a coward Liberal!!! Funny! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoop Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 Strange how this guy uses the environment as an example of how bad Bush is. Yet the U.S. has gone further in reducing greenhouse gases than Canada has since the Kyoto Accord meetings. So who is the real environmental laggard? You know honestpolitician, maybe if you had a clue what you were talking about people would be more inclined to listen! Are you a member of Paul Martin's *brain trust*?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Honest Politician Posted January 5, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 Thanks for the personal insult. More conservative maturity. I put it out there as an opinion that someone posted, and just because it conflicts with your little conservative world views you attack me personally. Grow up, and get a life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minimus Maximus Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 LinkInteresting point of view. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Utter drivel. I once heard Bush claim that the sky was blue. Harper has also used this same terminology. How long will it be before Canada is fighting imperialistic wars in the middle east if this keeps up? If blogs like this constitute credible sources in your mind you should maybe be watching cartoons and not posting on political forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiti Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 Harper-Bush, Bush-Harper.... both neo-cons who look after their friends and the rest can go to h*ll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Honest Politician Posted January 5, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 LinkInteresting point of view. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Utter drivel. I once heard Bush claim that the sky was blue. Harper has also used this same terminology. How long will it be before Canada is fighting imperialistic wars in the middle east if this keeps up? If blogs like this constitute credible sources in your mind you should maybe be watching cartoons and not posting on political forums. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Another personal insult from a conservative. What a joke! I suppose your conservative blogs are all true, right? This is simply another person who cannot fail to see the similarities between Harper and Bush. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minimus Maximus Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 LinkInteresting point of view. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Utter drivel. I once heard Bush claim that the sky was blue. Harper has also used this same terminology. How long will it be before Canada is fighting imperialistic wars in the middle east if this keeps up? If blogs like this constitute credible sources in your mind you should maybe be watching cartoons and not posting on political forums. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Another personal insult from a conservative. What a joke! I suppose your conservative blogs are all true, right? This is simply another person who cannot fail to see the similarities between Harper and Bush. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't remember claiming to be a conservative. My point is that the character who wrote this piece is obviously grasping at staws in an attempt to create a link between Harper and Bush. Your the one who seems to be falling for it hook/line/sinker. Show me credible links to this bloggers position and I will ponder them. Otherwise your cred is in question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Honest Politician Posted January 5, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 How is my "cred" in question due to someone else's opinion? Your logic is a joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minimus Maximus Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 How is my "cred" in question due to someone else's opinion? Your logic is a joke. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You posted this crap not me. My logic is fine, yours however.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Honest Politician Posted January 5, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 What a lame argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minimus Maximus Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 What a lame argument. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I agree, your argument is lame. Don't give up though I have heard of a talking dog that supports your position, maybe you two could hook up and create a blog with as much credability as the the one you have posted here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiti Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 What a lame argument. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I agree, your argument is lame. Don't give up though I have heard of a talking dog that supports your position, maybe you two could hook up and create a blog with as much credability as the the one you have posted here. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Favorite Con trick...... when they can't address the issues, they attack the person. Now who has ....... promised tax cuts, promised not to alter abortion laws, pledged to make government “smaller” and pledged to increase the military???? Who??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Honest Politician Posted January 5, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 What do you know, the conservatives have a conspiracy theory to rival that of the Bush/Cheney administration's rise to power. It's a long read. Link I agree, your argument is lame. Don't give up though I have heard of a talking dog that supports your position, maybe you two could hook up and create a blog with as much credability as the the one you have posted here. So do you have anything to back yourself up? Or are you just going to post whatever dribbles out of your mouth? All I am doing is posting what others have written. You are being childish. Show us all how Harper is not simply Bush-lite. Back up your posts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minimus Maximus Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 What a lame argument. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I agree, your argument is lame. Don't give up though I have heard of a talking dog that supports your position, maybe you two could hook up and create a blog with as much credability as the the one you have posted here. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Favorite Con trick. Can't Con trick..... when they can't address the issues, they attack the person. Now who has ....... promised tax cuts, promised not to alter abortion laws, pledged to make government “smaller” and pledged to increase the military???? Who??? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Where the hell did I say that I was a "con". How about considering the fact that I am a non-partisan Canadian who is sick and tired of the mudslinging from all sides of the Canadian political equation. The so called Honest Politician posted what amounts to a rant with no misgivings or doubts about the credibility of his/her source. I happen to be attacking the source, and anyone who takes it at face value. As far as the rest of your post goes, I NEVER SAID I WAS A CONSERVATIVE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 What a lame argument. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I agree, your argument is lame. Don't give up though I have heard of a talking dog that supports your position, maybe you two could hook up and create a blog with as much credability as the the one you have posted here. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Favorite Con trick...... when they can't address the issues, they attack the person. Now who has ....... promised tax cuts, promised not to alter abortion laws, pledged to make government “smaller” and pledged to increase the military???? Who??? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Uhm, Paul Martin has promised all those things... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 LinkInteresting point of view. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Interesting is a word with a variety of connotations. Given that, it's certainly "interesting". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minimus Maximus Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 What do you know, the conservatives have a conspiracy theory to rival that of the Bush/Cheney administration's rise to power.It's a long read. Link I agree, your argument is lame. Don't give up though I have heard of a talking dog that supports your position, maybe you two could hook up and create a blog with as much credability as the the one you have posted here. So do you have anything to back yourself up? Or are you just going to post whatever dribbles out of your mouth? All I am doing is posting what others have written. You are being childish. Show us all how Harper is not simply Bush-lite. Back up your posts. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I suppose this is reverse onus. You posted this crap, you provide sources which back up your claim that the information in this rant is credible. Your the one being childish here dude/dudette, I have never made a claim either way, you have posted something which lacks credibility. The onus is on you as the one who started this thread to provide sources which back up the bloggers claims, unless you don't agree with them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribblet Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 Just another scare tactic, like Martin, pandering to the bigotry of anti-Americanism to win votes. Ughhhhh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiti Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 What a lame argument. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I agree, your argument is lame. Don't give up though I have heard of a talking dog that supports your position, maybe you two could hook up and create a blog with as much credability as the the one you have posted here. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Favorite Con trick...... when they can't address the issues, they attack the person. Now who has ....... promised tax cuts, promised not to alter abortion laws, pledged to make government “smaller” and pledged to increase the military???? Who??? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Uhm, Paul Martin has promised all those things... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Martin promised tax cuts and they came into effect Jan 2005, he NEVER promised not to alter abortion laws, he NEVER promised to make government smaller and he NEVER promised to increase the military.... just to buy more and better equipment. Guess again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 Harper = Bush lite. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What an interesting opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 Harper-Bush, Bush-Harper.... both neo-cons who look after their friends and the rest can go to h*ll. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Are you suggesting that Paul Martin and Jean Chretien are neo-cons? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiti Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 Just another scare tactic, like Martin, pandering to the bigotry of anti-Americanism to win votes. Ughhhhh <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Can't refute the accucations again Harper so must must try and deflect. Posting facts is not another scare tactic. Being anti-american is not bigotry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.