Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I actually saw one of the lists, it was on the back of a document that says "Classified: People Suicided by Killary"

Quote

 

To Do: 

1) Ignore Chuck's lies

2) Clean up Obama's mess in the ME

3) Listen to lying, shrieking reporters for 1/2 an hour

4) Talk to the criminals from the FBI

5) Lunch

......

 

 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

It is the morally bankrupt and those who know they're wrong who IGNORE the LACK OF CREDIBILITY

LOL - that would be you kiddo :)   But yes, you're right and we all agree you're morally bankrupt :)

Which is why you couldn't address the pentagon study's findings :)   You knew you were wrong but tried to IGNORE it :)

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL - that would be you kiddo :)   But yes, you're right and we all agree you're morally bankrupt :)

Which is why you couldn't address the pentagon study's findings :)   You knew you were wrong but tried to IGNORE it :)

It was not a Pentagon study, it was a Rand Corp study. Now, consider the FIRST SENTENCE of the study:

Individuals who hold or held a security clearance and handled classified material could become a security threat if they develop dementia and unwittingly share government secrets.”

”Unwittingly share state secrets,” such as accidentally disclosing Israeli intelligence secrets to the Russian ambassador, or thinking that you’re entitled to keep Compartmentalized classified documents in cardboard boxes in a bathroom, or writing to do lists on the back of Classified marked documents?  Hmm… who do you suppose the Rand Corp had in mind when they drafted that study? 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Rebound said:

It was not a Pentagon study, it was a Rand Corp study. Now, consider the FIRST SENTENCE of the study:

Individuals who hold or held a security clearance and handled classified material could become a security threat if they develop dementia and unwittingly share government secrets.”

”Unwittingly share state secrets,” such as accidentally disclosing Israeli intelligence secrets to the Russian ambassador, or thinking that you’re entitled to keep Compartmentalized classified documents in cardboard boxes in a bathroom, or writing to do lists on the back of Classified marked documents?  Hmm… who do you suppose the Rand Corp had in mind when they drafted that study? 

Who did they have in mind?  Are you suggesting that Biden is so obviously afflicted with dementia that they MUST have been thinking of him?

And is any part of what they wrote inaccurate? It does make sense at first glance - do you have reason to believe it's not accurate?

Is THAT why you tried to blame the paper instead of looking at the report? I notice you were afraid to even link to the report in your post.

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
On 9/22/2023 at 10:59 PM, CdnFox said:

Who did they have in mind?  Are you suggesting that Biden is so obviously afflicted with dementia that they MUST have been thinking of him?

And is any part of what they wrote inaccurate? It does make sense at first glance - do you have reason to believe it's not accurate?

Is THAT why you tried to blame the paper instead of looking at the report? I notice you were afraid to even link to the report in your post.

Their paper had nothing to do with Trump or Biden, but you’re too partisan to understand, so it’s pointless to discuss. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
6 hours ago, Rebound said:

Their paper had nothing to do with Trump or Biden, but you’re too partisan to understand, so it’s pointless to discuss. 

You were the one who brought up "who they had in mind" -  i just asked questions.

But you're too partisan (and stupid. ) to understand so it's pointless to discuss.

But i do love that you weren't bright enough to remember I was responding to YOUR post  and that it was your comments :)  

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

You were the one who brought up "who they had in mind" -  i just asked questions.

But you're too partisan (and stupid. ) to understand so it's pointless to discuss.

But i do love that you weren't bright enough to remember I was responding to YOUR post  and that it was your comments :)  

Nonsense. Deluge said it was about Biden when he posted his “proof” from Iran.  That’s what you lunatics have devolved to: You clowns now cite Iranian and Russian state propaganda as your evidence.  That’s how far detached you are from reality. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Nonsense. Deluge said it was about Biden when he posted his “proof” from Iran. 

And you said 'who did they have in mind when they wrote it do you think".

Soooo  - still your comment big guy.

You sure spend a lot of time desperately trying to backtrack things you've said.  Ok - are you claiming now tjat you've changed your mind and that you now think they DIDN"T have biden in mind? Who DID you think they had in mind?

If you need to - write your answers down in a spreadsheet so you can keep track of your changes later.

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
Just now, CdnFox said:

And you said 'who did they have in mind when they wrote it do you think".

Soooo  - still your comment big guy.

You sure spend a lot of time desperately trying to backtrack things you've said.  Ok - are you claiming now tjat you've changed your mind and that you now think they DIDN"T have biden in mind? Who DID you think they had in mind?

If you need to - write your answers down in a spreadsheet so you can keep track of your changes later.

I was pointing out that it’s Trump who has been ridiculously irresponsible and unlawful in mishandling classified information.  Which is the subject of this thread. The madman wrote to-do lists for his aides on the back of classified documents. He literally used classified documents as scrap paper. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
Just now, Rebound said:

I was pointing out that it’s Trump who has been ridiculously irresponsible and unlawful in mishandling classified information.  

What's that got to do with who they had in mind when they wrote that paper?

Quote

Which is the subject of this thread.

But not the subject of the paper you were discussing and specifically referenced

I see.   So ...  you said something stupid and now you're trying to dodge that instead of simply addressing it and moving on.  You dont' want to discuss what you said because you realize it actually makes biden look worse and you screwed up.

Sigh,  well... if it's going to help your mental health to pretend you didn't say it and let you live with your shame then fine, we'll let it go i guess.

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,024
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    portman123
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...