Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, robosmith said:

^This is called "cognitive dissonance." Do you know what that means?

It means YOU ARBITRARILY REJECT FACTS which conflict with YOU EXISTING BIASES.

The FACT that you're rejecting here is the CLEARLY WRITTEN documentation of the Presidential Records Act for which YOU HAVE NO REASON to reject.

That makes YOU the IGNORANT DUMBASS.

I know what that means, and trust me, I've never been clearer when dealing with a shill like you. ;)

I reject liars, and there are a shitload of liars on the Left, including you. 

I understand the Presidential Act, you don't.

I understand what espionage is, and you don't.

Trump isn't a spy and you think he is. This is why dumbasses like you should be relegated strictly to your living room televisions. 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
6 hours ago, Deluge said:

I know what that means, and trust me, I've never been clearer when dealing with a shill like you. ;)

I reject liars, and there are a shitload of liars on the Left, including you. 

I understand the Presidential Act, you don't.

I understand what espionage is, and you don't.

Trump isn't a spy and you think he is. This is why dumbasses like you should be relegated strictly to your living room televisions. 

First you say you understand the Presidential Act, even though it’s the Presidential Records Act, and no charges are filed under the PRA. 
 

Then, you say you know what espionage is. To be clear, I don’t give a shlt what espionage is. It doesn’t matter what espionage is. What matters is that the Espionage Act says. I read the Espionage Act, and it’s very clear that Trump violated it, and each violation carries a maximum sentence of 20 years.  

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
On 6/18/2023 at 10:47 AM, Deluge said:

Why aren't we prosecuting ALL criminals, Rebound?

That's the difference between a paid lawyer, a PAID lawyer, and one that was court appointed for you. 

Anyone saying it's fact based and law based, are delusional at best. 

A boss lawyer will find a loop hole or a "this glove is too small"(OJ Simpson reference) technicality and win a case for their client. 

Trump has money and a legal team. He could literally delay this case for a very long time. 

What if he wins the presidency. What then? 

Posted
12 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

That's the difference between a paid lawyer, a PAID lawyer, and one that was court appointed for you. 

Anyone saying it's fact based and law based, are delusional at best. 

A boss lawyer will find a loop hole or a "this glove is too small"(OJ Simpson reference) technicality and win a case for their client. 

Trump has money and a legal team. He could literally delay this case for a very long time. 

What if he wins the presidency. What then? 

OJ Simpson did eventually wind up in prison. Because criminals keep committing one crime after another, and it finally catches up with them. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
9 hours ago, Rebound said:

OJ Simpson did eventually wind up in prison. Because criminals keep committing one crime after another, and it finally catches up with them. 

You're missing the point. 

Posted
On 6/20/2023 at 7:11 PM, Perspektiv said:

That's the difference between a paid lawyer, a PAID lawyer, and one that was court appointed for you. 

Anyone saying it's fact based and law based, are delusional at best. 

A boss lawyer will find a loop hole or a "this glove is too small"(OJ Simpson reference) technicality and win a case for their client. 

Trump has money and a legal team. He could literally delay this case for a very long time. 

What if he wins the presidency. What then? 

He can only delay it as long as the judge ALLOWS.

She has already set a trial date, thus indicating she is expediting the schedule.

Posted
Just now, robosmith said:

thus indicating she is expediting the schedule.

I wonder why.

Posted

 

Quote

“Mr. Trump confessed to personally going through the boxes and had no explanation for why classified records from those boxes wound up in his personal desk. He placed himself at the scene of the retention and obstruction. This is the stuff of nightmares for a defense attorney.” — Former national security lawyer Bradley Moss about Donald Trump’s Sunday night interview with Fox News.

 https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-bret-baier-interview-legal-experts-react-1807744

Posted
Just now, Perspektiv said:

I wonder why.

Probably to discourage shenanigans by Trump's legal team and maybe to regain her reputation that was destroyed by her previous rulings that were so laughable that they were trounced by the 11th appeals court saying there was no basis in the law for them.

Posted

 The GOP’s remarkable views of Trump’s classified documents

Quote

Multiple polls focused on the Trump classified documents case suggest that many, if not most, Republicans don’t particularly appreciate the potential gravity of the situation or its details. And it can’t simply be explained by mere partisanship.

One of the inescapable facts of the situation is that Trump got himself in trouble not because he took the documents in the first place, but because he declined to return them. The indictment only charges conduct after the government subpoenaed Trump’s documents in May 2022. After that subpoena, Trump only returned some of his remaining classified documents before the FBI’s search of Mar-a-Lago turned up more. The Washington Post recapped how Trump’s fateful decision not to return the documents resulted from rejecting his lawyers’ advice.

But despite it being readily apparent that Trump didn’t do what the government asked, a new YouGov poll shows Republicans, by and large, maintain that he did. It shows 53 percent say Trump ‘cooperated in returning documents,’ with just 15 percent saying he didn’t.

 Trumpers are easily confused by Trump's LIES.

He DID return SOME of the documents and the MAGA CULT believes his LIES that he returned ALL of them.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

You need to STOP LYING HERE.

That wasn't lying, that was a question. You can see the little question mark at the end.

See? You ARE confused :)    LOLOL

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...