West Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 2 minutes ago, Nationalist said: @West See? Like the crazy guy yelling obscenities on the street corner... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 4 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Let 'em babble. I'm often tempted to ask them if they want a bigger shovel? The more they BS, the dumber they sound. Do y'all pound down on each other's squiggly brown rounds while slapping each other on the back celebrating how f__king dense y'all are? Wake the f__k up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 2 hours ago, ironstone said: Didn't the laptop incident meet the legal requirements to be considered abandoned by the owner? The repair shop owner apparently tried for months to get a hold of Biden but was unsuccessful. Doesn't matter. The law applies to the CONTENT which was not forfeitable to the shop owner. He could sell the hardware, but disclosing CONTENT is still ILLEGAL. 2 hours ago, ironstone said: First there were denials. The story was false/Russian disinformation. Now the truth is coming out in the open. Hunter Biden admits infamous laptop is his in plea for probe (nypost.com) Hunter Biden admits infamous abandoned laptop belongs to him | Washington Examiner Doesn't mean the content was NOT tampered with by Russians or others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: As I expected. Barb...you're full of it. You are not interested in truth or facts. You're interested in Libbie domination at any cost. Even by lying and cheating. You don't understand how your polls are meaningless in determining ANY objective truth. Fallacy. Look it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 1 hour ago, Deluge said: And you can't distinguish between right and wrong. Poor, poor, degenerate.... And you IMAGINE YOUR "distinguish" is definitive. It's NOT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Choke on it. You should practice on a banana. Then you won't choke so much.... F__,king dimwitted Jethro. Edited February 3, 2023 by CrakHoBarbie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 51 minutes ago, Deluge said: You have no viable evidence; just a twisted network of bullshitters patting each other on the ass. lol Where have YOU posted ANY evidence? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 26 minutes ago, West said: ?... Adam Schiff, biggest LIAR in congress who's the mastermind behind all the looney left wing conspiracy theories, made it up. Enough said HAHAHAHA. ^Imagines his SIMPLE declarations are proof. They are EVIDENCE you HAVE NO PROOF. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 Just now, robosmith said: HAHAHAHA. ^Imagines his SIMPLE declarations are proof. They are EVIDENCE you HAVE NO PROOF. ? What proof has that lunatic provided besides his delusional conspiracy theories? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deluge Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 7 minutes ago, robosmith said: Of course you are LYING. The question is whether you have ANY understanding of how ILLOGICAL what you say is. Let's try this logic: IF "nobody likes the left," "the left" would never get elected. Does that help you understand how YOUR CLAIMS are PATENTLY ILLOGICAL and FALSE? Now let's hear another LIE about MASSIVE voter fraud, instead of the truth that Biden got 7 MILLION more votes than Trump. Your desperation is PATHETIC. I guess you activists don't internalize the fact that your pervert candidates come across as moderates, yet too many voters don't take the time to vet the scumbags. See, I believe that most liberals truly want what's right, but they are too gullible to see through the woketards. Woketards like yourself. No, the world understands that the hair sniffer in chief is a total joke and they're laughing behind his/her back. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 24 minutes ago, West said: Adam Schiff was the lead collusion truther but has faced no consequences for his LIES that his LOW IQ followers subscribed to Because you CANNOT prove he lied. Apparently you don't know HOW to prove anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: Where have YOU posted ANY evidence? You have yet to post anything intelligent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 Just now, robosmith said: Because you CANNOT prove he lied. Apparently you don't know HOW to prove anything. He CLAIMED WITH OUT EVIDENCE the laptop was hacked by "Russia" ?.. How gullible are you rejects? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 Just now, West said: You have yet to post anything intelligent I'll take that as a compliment from the guy who has no knowledge of reality but posts that stupidity HERE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 Just now, West said: He CLAIMED WITH OUT EVIDENCE the laptop was hacked by "Russia" ?.. How gullible are you rejects? *I* didn't make that claim. YOU made the claim that it didn't happen. Apparently you don't know how to read, either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deluge Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 39 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: As I've told your little butt buddies, come back when you can discern between gossip and reality. Ok halfwit? Don't take it out on your mirror, Crakpipe, it's an inanimate object - virtually impervious to any emotion whatsoever. Be a man; take responsibility for your own degeneracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonbox Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Question: Is it generally a wise idea, to limit your information, when making a serious decision? Using the loosest definition of "information", we know that not all of it is equal. It's therefore not only wise, but completely necessary to critically filter (limit) the information on which you draw. If the "information" you're consuming doesn't have enough of a basis in facts and reason, it can and should be promptly discarded as worthless (at best). This is how most people avoid being misinformed and ignorant. Your question is fascinating nonetheless, as it seems to suggest that I'm somehow closed-minded for discarding your retarded "sources". That you casually discard the collective weight of experts and news media spanning the entire globe is somehow lost on you - just another in a long list of ironic self-contradictions you can't seem to avoid. In answer to your question: Yes. I do think it's wise to limit the information I get out of the Islamic Republic of Iran, a fundamentalist dictatorship with strict media censorship and little/no concept of freedom. That you obviously disagree is a brilliant example of how you're filtering your information to support your flimsy worldview: Media in western democracies is all BAD, all LYING and all misinformed by the equally dishonest scientific/political/legal/mititary/historical experts that contribute to their reporting. Leaders and media from places like Iran, Syria and Russia, however, are reputable sources of information. Vladimir Putin and the Supreme Ayatollah are to be trusted and relied on. Yup yup. Edited February 3, 2023 by Moonbox 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 24 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Ya gits wut ya pays fer...sonny-boy. Choke on it. I will make you choke on it. Like your previous "predictions." LMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 Just now, Deluge said: Don't take it out on your mirror, Crakpipe, it's an inanimate object - virtually impervious to any emotion whatsoever. Be a man; take responsibility for your own degeneracy. Look at you babbling along like the half-witted Jethro that you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 1 minute ago, robosmith said: *I* didn't make that claim. YOU made the claim that it didn't happen. Apparently you don't know how to read, either. You are following the lead of your collusion truther cult leader Adam Schiff.. A warning for you.. when he tells you to drink the juice don't do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 5 minutes ago, Moonbox said: Using the loosest definition of "information", we know that not all of it is equal. It's therefore not only wise, but completely necessary to critically filter (limit) the information on which you draw. If the "information" you're consuming doesn't have enough of a basis in facts and reason, it can and should be promptly discarded as worthless (at best). This is how most people avoid being misinformed and ignorant. Your question is fascinating nonetheless, as it seems to suggest that I'm somehow closed-minded for discarding your retarded "sources". That you casually discard the collective weight of experts and news media spanning the entire globe is somehow lost on you - just another in a long list of ironic self-contradictions you can't seem to avoid. In answer to your question: Yes. I do think it's wise to limit the information I get out of the Islamic Republic of Iran, a fundamentalist dictatorship with strict media censorship and little/no concept of freedom. That you obviously disagree is a brilliant example of how you're filtering your information to support your flimsy worldview: Media in western democracies is all BAD, all LYING and all misinformed by the equally dishonest scientific/political/legal/mititary/historical experts that contribute to their reporting. Leaders and media from places like Iran, Syria and Russia, however, are reputable sources of information. Vladimir Putin and the Supreme Ayatollah are to be trusted and relied on. Yup yup. How many accounts do you have, moonpie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 22 minutes ago, West said: My patience is wearing thin on these lefty collusion truthers Take it up with the Republican led Senate Intelligence Committee RUSSIAN ACTIVE MEASURES CAMPAIGNS AND INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 U.S. ELECTION VOLUME 5: COUNTERINTELLIGENCE THREATS AND VULNERABILITIES report_volume5.pdf - Senate Intelligence Committee You patience will always "wear thin" when you embark on a FOOL'S ERRAND of denying the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 Just now, robosmith said: Take it up with the Republican led Senate Intelligence Committee RUSSIAN ACTIVE MEASURES CAMPAIGNS AND INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 U.S. ELECTION VOLUME 5: COUNTERINTELLIGENCE THREATS AND VULNERABILITIES report_volume5.pdf - Senate Intelligence Committee You patience will always "wear thin" when you embark on a FOOL'S ERRAND of denying the truth. Yet none of that PROVES your delusions that the laptop was from "Russia" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deluge Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 (edited) 56 minutes ago, robosmith said: Of course I've HEARD of tax felonies. And KNOW that they are rare, esp when LIKE HUNTER, the debts are acknowledged and PAID. You do know he paid his delinquent taxes, don't you? LMAO Hunter Biden Paid Tax Bill, but Federal Investigation Goes On Well skippy, you better tell the Feds, because they still think this scumbag has more to answer for. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/06/hunter-biden-case-feds-believe-evidence-supports-tax-and-gun-charges.html You see, pervert, it doesn't matter how much you cherish wrong behaviors, there is nothing you can say or do to convince me that everything you stand for isn't complete dog sht. Edited February 3, 2023 by Deluge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 3, 2023 Report Share Posted February 3, 2023 27 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Let 'em babble. I'm often tempted to ask them if they want a bigger shovel? The more they BS, the dumber they sound. Doesn't compare with your stupidity of denying official Congressional reports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.