85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

You bought into the fear-mongering hook, line and sinker...

While LMAO the whole time.

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

While LMAO the whole time.

Ya, I know you laugh at studies and datasets.  Not sure why you're proud of being anti-science....but you do you.

[eyeball]

20 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Ya, I know you laugh at studies and datasets.  Not sure why you're proud of being anti-science....but you do you.

I'm not anti science in the least little bit. AFAIC scientists should be running the planet.

[Goddess]

9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I'm not anti science in the least little bit. AFAIC scientists should be running the planet.

Uh-huh.  Not sure I believe you when you've consistently rejected science in favor of CBC headlines and keep repeating anti-science lies.

[eyeball]

Just now, Goddess said:

Not sure I believe you when you've consistently rejected science

I told you why I reject anything you put up. I have little doubt most scientists you support would be appalled if they know what else you have to say on the topic.

[CdnFox]

19 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I'm not anti science in the least little bit. AFAIC scientists should be running the planet.

HA!! Well that's a hell of a lie. 

You ignore science constantly. Science regularly goes right out the window with you the moment it interferes with your echo chamber talking points. 

You think science is something to be ignored if it doesnt' support your position. You've been saying that for decades now  

Edited August 8, 2024 by CdnFox

[Goddess]

8 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I told you why I reject anything you put up.

Ya, I know.  You reject peer-reviewed scientific studies from top medical journals around the world.  But you support scientists who tell you there's no such thing as natural immunity and believe that ivermectin is "horsepaste" because CBC told you so.

You're anti-science.

[eyeball]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You reject peer-reviewed scientific studies from top medical journals around the world. 

Said the twit who rejects peer review.

[WestCanMan]

Eyeball's version of "science":

[WestCanMan]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Ya, I know.  You reject peer-reviewed scientific studies from top medical journals around the world.  But you support scientists who tell you there's no such thing as natural immunity and believe that ivermectin is "horsepaste" because CBC told you so.

You're anti-science.

Eyeball still won't say where he's at on the vax-efficacy spectrum.

Everyone is somewhere from:

10:  The vaccines are perfectly safe and effective. They will get us to herd immunity. If you're vaccinated you don't need to worry about covid, and if you're not, you could die, regardless of your age and level of fitness

to

1: The vaccines don't work at all. In fact, they do more harm than good.

 

If I had to guess he's at about a 9, the second official declaration of vax efficacy: You might get a bit sick but never end up in hospital. Everyone else will probably die, and they deserve it! 

[Goddess]

11 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Said the twit who rejects peer review.

What the fuque are you talking about?  That's almost all I post.  And you reject every one of them by stating some CBC talking point from 4 years ago.

??????

[Goddess]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Eyeball still won't say where he's at on the vax-efficacy spectrum.

Everyone is somewhere from:

10:  The vaccines are perfectly safe and effective. They will get us to herd immunity. If you're vaccinated you don't need to worry about covid, and if you're not, you could die, regardless of your age and level of fitness

to

1: The vaccines don't work at all. In fact, they do more harm than good.

 

If I had to guess he's at about a 9, the second official declaration of vax efficacy: You might get a bit sick but never end up in hospital. Everyone else will probably die, and they deserve it! 

Now he's saying I reject peer-reviewed science when I'm probably the one who posts the majority of it here 🙄

I think he's literally insane.

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

Now he's saying I reject peer-reviewed science when I'm probably the one who posts the majority of it here 🙄

I'll second that. 95% of the current peer-reviewed and actual covid science on this forum came from you.

Quote

I think he's literally insane.

Denial ain't just a river.

[Goddess]

A virus so novel that it decided to kill more 15-64 year olds in 2021 versus 2020 in the US.

As it became less virulent.  And mass vaccinations.

 Excess deaths in 2020:  124k

Excess deaths in 2021:  215k

A 73% increase.

Pandemic Scorecard (humanityprojects.info)

[CdnFox]

31 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Eyeball still won't say where he's at on the vax-efficacy spectrum.

Everyone is somewhere from:

10:  The vaccines are perfectly safe and effective. They will get us to herd immunity. If you're vaccinated you don't need to worry about covid, and if you're not, you could die, regardless of your age and level of fitness

to

1: The vaccines don't work at all. In fact, they do more harm than good.

 

If I had to guess he's at about a 9, the second official declaration of vax efficacy: You might get a bit sick but never end up in hospital. Everyone else will probably die, and they deserve it! 

He's wherever he needs to be to support his left wing talking points at that moment.  Vax is both good and bad, effective and non  effective, safe or dangerous depending on the circumstance.  Schrodinger's vax. 

[eyeball]

38 minutes ago, Goddess said:

What the fuque are you talking about?

The way you dialled back the importance of peer review just a couple weeks ago.

Peer-review is not the pinnacle of science.

40 minutes ago, Goddess said:

That's almost all I post. 

You also post that Fauci = Mengele. I guess you're just completely oblivious to how crippling this is to your credibility.

Am I wrong to assume the scientists you quote agree Fauci = Mengele? Why would you cite them otherwise?

 

44 minutes ago, Goddess said:

And you reject every one of them by stating some CBC talking point from 4 years ago.

What talking point specifically? You just pulled that from your butt didn't you?

[Goddess]

9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Peer-review is not the pinnacle of science.

It's not. Reproducibility is.  It's why a lot of "peer-reviewed" studies get pulled.  If you toss a bottle of water into the air and it lands right side up, you can then write a study that says all bottles will land right side up.  But if other studies can't reproduce the same result - the study is useless, peer-reviewed or not. If you don't understand that, I don't know what to tell you.  It's basic science.

Summary - Reproducibility and Replicability in Science - NCBI Bookshelf (nih.gov)

When a newly reported scientific study has far-reaching implications for science or a major potential impact on the public, the question of its reliability takes on heightened importance. Concerns over reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular media.

Reproducibility is obtaining consistent results using the same input data; computational steps, methods, and code; and conditions of analysis.

Reproducibility: why it matters and how it can be nurtured | Elsevier

Reproducibility – the repeatability of research findings to enable research and knowledge to progress – is vital and underpins trust in science.

 

You don't get to ignore information that's given to you and then claim it doesn't exist, which is what you've done throughout the covid years.  Ignore anything that doesn't agree with CBC headlines. 

I really think you just do not have the brain capacity to absorb anything beyond CBC headlines.

[eyeball]

Just now, Goddess said:

It's not. Reproducibility is.

Ok, how many scientists have reproduced your conclusions about Fauci?

Marjorie Taylor Greene doesn't count.

[Goddess]

9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Ok, how many scientists have reproduced your conclusions about Fauci?

Watch the news or tune into some of the US Senate hearings.  Read some of the books written about it - there's lots.

Don't tell me, let me guess what your next comment is - you refuse to read anything bad about Fauci's activities. 🙄

[eyeball]

Just now, Goddess said:

Watch the news or tune into some of the US Senate hearings.  Read some of the books written about it - there's lots.

No there really isn't otherwise it would be inspiring 10's upon hundreds of thousands of people if not millions to violent bloody retribution around the world.

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

No there really isn't otherwise it would be inspiring 10's upon hundreds of thousands of people if not millions to violent bloody retribution around the world.

See?  I was right again!

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Ok, how many scientists have reproduced your conclusions about Fauci?

So here are some indisputable facts about Fauci. Things that he said publicly and things that he even said himself under oath.

1. His NIH funded research on the bat coronavirus to make it more transmissible among humans, and he signed off on that funding. He argued with Paul Rand in congress about whether or not that work constituted GoF research, so we know for absolute certain that he did fund that research. It was done before covid got out.
2. After covid got out, Fauci pointed solely in the direction of the wetmarket as the source of the virus, saying that it likely came from a bat in the wetmarket and through "an intermediary species, such as a pangolin", while knowing full-well that there was already a bat coronavirus which was transmissible between humans less than a block away in the BSL4 lab. The one that he funded.

At the time Fauci said that covid "likely came from a bat in the wetmarket, through an intermediary species, such as a pangolin", you and I knew nothing of that coronavirus-manipulating BSL4 lab, and obviously never suspected that Fauci himself had created a "covid virus" in it.

Don't you think that Fauci was hiding something from the public?

If you knew back then, in that moment, that Fauci was sitting on that information and blaming the nefarious pangolin, while knowing that a covid virus existed in the lab at the time the virus got out, would you trust him even 1%?

Also, remember that Fauci was saying "We don't believe that H2H transmission is occurring" when he knew that the covid virus in that lab, which he funded, was 100% transmissible among humans. 

 

Think about Fauci's thought process moving fwd from that date: "Geez, I know that the covid virus that we created is right there, beside the wetmarket. I know that it's transmissible among humans. Still, I'm gonna tell people that the only source of the virus that we're really considering to be likely is the pangolins story, and I'm gonna say "we believe that it's not transmissible. among humans."

Do you think he believed what he said on that day, or did he lie? 

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Don't tell me, let me guess what your next comment is - you refuse to read anything bad about Fauci's activities.

Nope, the comic relief is just to good to pass up.

[eyeball]

 

 

19 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Don't you think that Fauci was hiding something from the public?

Wouldn't you if you'd deliberately, knowingly and premeditatively killed millions of people world wide?

That is what you believe isn't it?

And it never occurred to you to pick up a weapon and do something about it? It's unbelievable.

[Goddess]

47 minutes ago, eyeball said:

 

And it never occurred to you to pick up a weapon and do something about it? It's unbelievable.

No. I want him prosecuted. And there's a bunch of senators and politicians in the US that are trying to make that happen when they witnessed him lying about the gof research.

So this act of yours, pretending that I'm the only person in the world who thinks he's responsible for the pandemic, is pretty fuquing lame.

Question is: why DON'T you want the person responsible for the pandemic prosecuted?  I mean if you truly believe there were swaths of bodies being bulldozed into  mass graves all over the world, why wouldn't you?