Is this fine re:politics forum more Trump friendly or more Trump hating?

[Aristides]

15 hours ago, DONKIROCK said:

?

Lucky you!

I found a picture of you so you don't have to face the double embarrassments of not only BEING a goofball but also of running the risk of someone posting an even MORE UNFLATTERING picture of you later.

You're welcome. 

By the way, you DO know that Trump prevented Russia from invading Ukraine  for four + years, right?

?

Trump wouldn’t have lifted a finger to help Ukraine. You Trump boosters have done nothing but support Putin’s invasion.

[DONKIROCK]

44 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Trump wouldn’t have lifted a finger to help Ukraine. You Trump boosters have done nothing but support Putin’s invasion.

What part did Zelensky play in helping advance the Biden's corruption?

But the fact is that Zelensky cited Trump's sanctions as what prevented Russia from invading during the Trump years.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

the "Southern Strategy" is just a Democrat left wing media conspiracy theory

Nixon won an overwhelming landslide victory, twice

because the Democrats had gone so far to the left, they drove moderate Democrats to the GOP

the racists in the South opposed Nixon, they ran George Wallace against him

the South is solidly Red because the Democrats became a lunatic left wing party, and Southrons are conservative

Part of the reason for Nixon's Southern Strategy was to COMPETE with Wallace. Duh.

Your statement has been FACT CHECKED and found: 

Candace Owens' false statement that the Southern strategy is a myth

Quote

The facts about the Southern strategy

For this fact-check, we interviewed historians and reviewed news articles from the civil rights era.

Joseph Alsop, an influential syndicated newspaper columnist, called it "basically a segregationist strategy" in a 1962 column.

When Republican Barry Goldwater ran for president in 1964, his Southern surrogates played up the fact that he had just voted against the Civil Rights Act. That paid off in the Deep South where he won a handful of states, but he ultimately lost to Lyndon B. Johnson.

By 1968, the Republicans fine-tuned their approach and packaged it in a way they could win, said Maxwell, the Arkansas professor and an expert on southern politics.

Republican nominee Richard Nixon reached out to white Southerners by opposing school busing and promising that his administration would not "ram anything down your throats" and would appoint "strict constructionist" Supreme Court justices.

The strongest evidence of the Southern strategy comes directly from Republicans at the time.

That includes Clarence Townes, who served as director of the Minorities Division of the Republican National Committee in the 1960s. Harvard professor Leah Wright Rigueur wrote about Townes in her book "The Loneliness of the Black Republican."

 

[Infidel Dog]

I'm tired of Progressives trying to sell their "Fact Checkers" as evidence. 

They're not. And here are my cites for that which are every bit as valid as a Prog's opinion labeled as a "fact check."

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/invasion-fact-checkers

https://noqreport.com/2022/02/09/how-fact-checking-is-controlled-and-faked/

The Southern Strategy was a made up conspiracy by a Progressive plant in the Nixon administration who went on to his more rightful occupation as a writer in Progressive journals. The phony bugaboo of a Southern Strategy was adopted and enlarged on by the sort of "experts"  progressive "fact checkers" might approve of.

Edited October 6, 2022 by Infidel Dog

[Infidel Dog]

Back on topic though, I'm 50/50 on whether this is a more MAGA friendly or TDSer style forum. 

Actually, it would be more accurate to say the TDSers outnumber the MAGAs but the MAGAs make better points so it evens out.

Edited October 6, 2022 by Infidel Dog

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

I'm tired of Progressives trying to sell their "Fact Checkers" as evidence. 

They cite EXPERTS in the field, unlike your opinion pieces below.

2 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

They're not. And here are my cites for that which are every bit as valid as a Prog's opinion labeled as a "fact check."

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/invasion-fact-checkers

Quote

Tablet is a daily online magazine of Jewish news, ideas, and culture.

2 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

https://noqreport.com/2022/02/09/how-fact-checking-is-controlled-and-faked/

Quote

Our worldview is driven by a conservative, Christian ideology.

2 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

The Southern Strategy was a made up conspiracy by a Progressive plant in the Nixon administration who went on to his more rightful occupation as a writer in Progressive journals. The phony bugaboo of a Southern Strategy was adopted and enlarged on by the sort of "experts"  progressive "fact checkers" might approve of.

If you read the fact check, you will see their experts cited are Republicans.

[Legato]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Part of the reason for Nixon's Southern Strategy was to COMPETE with Wallace. Duh.

Your statement has been FACT CHECKED and found: 

You spelled f*cked incorrectly. also it was never lost.

 

 

 

[robosmith]

4 minutes ago, Legato said:

 

You believe you're clever but couldn't even post your response correctly.

Thanks for that demonstration of your (in)competence.

Edited October 6, 2022 by robosmith

[Rebound]

On 10/5/2022 at 7:19 AM, DONKIROCK said:

Is this fine re:politics forum more Trump friendly or more Trump hating?

I am encouraged by the support my humble posts have received here so far but I wonder if my efforts to rally support for the GREAT MAN might be a waste of time.

?

All you do is say “Trump Great” over and over, without any explanation.  So if you aren’t explaining anything, how do you expect to get anyone to change their mind?

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

All you do is say “Trump Great” over and over, without any explanation.  So if you aren’t explaining anything, how do you expect to get anyone to change their mind?

Apparently the belief is, all you have do is end your sentence with "believe me!" and that will work. LMAO

That is what Trump has taught them. BELIEVE ME!

[DONKIROCK]

10 hours ago, Rebound said:

All you do is say “Trump Great” over and over, without any explanation.  So if you aren’t explaining anything, how do you expect to get anyone to change their mind?

I'm trying to better understand how your kind seems to continue your political viability without benefit of the facts, truth or substantiation.

I think my arguments could gain greater popularity if I learned to be a more accomplished liar.

The difficult part is trying to pretend to be a dim wit in order to actually believe untrue and evil messages and talking points from the higher ups.

Aside from being born blessed with better mental horsepower, which I cant take credit for, this exercise in trying to replicate your side's numbskulling ability to appeal to the average citizen is made even more difficult for me because Trump, MAGA and the GOP are more honest and deal with facts and reality far more than your side.

So, posting without evidence is as close as I can get to emulating you.

Maybe I should do more posting while imbibing.

?

Thanks for thinking about how I can better beat your arguments.

?

Edited October 7, 2022 by DONKIROCK

[DONKIROCK]

On 10/6/2022 at 10:04 AM, Infidel Dog said:

Back on topic though, I'm 50/50 on whether this is a more MAGA friendly or TDSer style forum. 

Actually, it would be more accurate to say the TDSers outnumber the MAGAs but the MAGAs make better points so it evens out.

THANK YOU!!!

I have been wondering why only a few of the TDS'ers have checked in since I arrived.

After reading your post, I now believe that only the B-team and C-team TDS folks now show up.

I place the C-teamers on "ignore."

That leaves poor guys like Rebound and Herbie to try to keep the Leftists sinking hopes alive.

We should be grateful that they are here for us to spar and practice with.

??

[robosmith]

40 minutes ago, DONKIROCK said:

THANK YOU!!!

I have been wondering why only a few of the TDS'ers have checked in since I arrived.

After reading your post, I now believe that only the B-team and C-team TDS folks now show up.

I place the C-teamers on "ignore."

That leaves poor guys like Rebound and Herbie to try to keep the Leftists sinking hopes alive.

We should be grateful that they are here for us to spar and practice with.

??

Oh donki, please believe what I say to keep my hopes alive. LMAO

It is hilarious that you believe YOUR ignoring anything affects ANYONE'S "hopes" in any way. Very Trumpian narcissistic.

He would be proud of his big mouthed cult member (if he knew you existed).

[Infidel Dog]

On 10/6/2022 at 12:25 PM, robosmith said:

They cite EXPERTS in the field, unlike your opinion pieces below.

If you read the fact check, you will see their experts cited are Republicans.

No they don't. They're all Proggy. One of them makes a one sentence reference from a book to someone your "fact checker" says is a Republican but my search engine has never heard of.

Are you used to being able to bluff you're way around people who won't double-check or something?

 

Edited October 7, 2022 by Infidel Dog

[Infidel Dog]

Tell you what though Robosmith if you'd like to see what an actual Republican has to say about the "Southern Strategy" try this one:

The myth of Nixon’s ‘Southern Strategy’

 

[robosmith]

20 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

No they don't. They're all Proggy. One of them makes a one sentence reference from a book to someone your "fact checker" says is a Republican but my search engine has never heard of.

Are you used to being able to bluff you're way around people who won't double-check or something?

 

Your inability to find something is NOT evidence it doesn't exist.

[robosmith]

19 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Tell you what though Robosmith if you'd like to see what an actual Republican has to say about the "Southern Strategy" try this one:

The myth of Nixon’s ‘Southern Strategy’

 

Sorry, but I know too much about those Republicans to believe anything they have to say in defense of Nixon.

And DINESH D'SOUZA is one of the MOST BIASED. You might as well cite Roger Stone. ?

Do you know how many of his cronies were convicted of felonies for acting on his behalf and direction?

OF COURSE there has LONG BEEN an EFFORT to rehabilitate Nixon. And McCarthy. And Reagan's Iran-Contra crimes.

Only the Party FAITHFUL are buying that.

[Infidel Dog]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Sorry, but I know too much about those Republicans to believe anything they have to say in defense of Nixon.

You know nothing. Stop proving it.

[robosmith]

13 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

You know nothing. Stop proving it.

I know enough to prove you wrong several times here in the last 24 hours.

Unlike your claim ^here, the evidence for mine is in writing in this thread.

You may believe DINESH D'SOUZA, but he has NO CREDIBILITY to defend Nixon.

[Rebound]

On 10/6/2022 at 11:01 AM, Infidel Dog said:

I'm tired of Progressives trying to sell their "Fact Checkers" as evidence. 

They're not. And here are my cites for that which are every bit as valid as a Prog's opinion labeled as a "fact check."

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/invasion-fact-checkers

https://noqreport.com/2022/02/09/how-fact-checking-is-controlled-and-faked/

The Southern Strategy was a made up conspiracy by a Progressive plant in the Nixon administration who went on to his more rightful occupation as a writer in Progressive journals. The phony bugaboo of a Southern Strategy was adopted and enlarged on by the sort of "experts"  progressive "fact checkers" might approve of.

Politicians in both parties always need strategies to win. The strategies of the Democrats is to play up their civil rights Bina fides, and to drive voter registration and turnout.   The Republicans have their own strategies, with every single election. So don’t tell us the GOP didn’t have a Southern Strategy, because of course they did. 
 

PS: Nixon was opposed to school busing. 

Edited October 7, 2022 by Rebound

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

Tell you what though Robosmith if you'd like to see what an actual Republican has to say about the "Southern Strategy" try this one:

The myth of Nixon’s ‘Southern Strategy’

 

Dinesh D'Souza, America's greatest conservative troll, explained

Quote

Here's how he went from being a respected conservative intellectual to a conspiracy-minded felon.