Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Boges said:

The first layer of explosives they installed a week before without anyone noticing. Duh!

Yup. My bad. It was all a giant hoax. Towers are still there and it is just an insurance scam. Bloody americans

“Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains.”
Winston S. Churchill

There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. –Robert Heinlein

Posted
7 minutes ago, Boges said:

The first layer of explosives they installed a week before without anyone noticing. Duh!

Do you agree, Boges, there is no damage there where the strongest part of the wing has already entered the building?

Posted
7 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Why are you all so damn afraid of discussing the actual issues? Look at the picture, capricorn. It is from CNN, a supporter of the USGOCT.

I prefer all 9/11 conspiracy theory discussion to be centralized so that I know exactly where to go for my daily entertainment.

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Posted
49 minutes ago, Boges said:

The first layer of explosives they installed a week before without anyone noticing. Duh!

C'mon Boges.  Don't be ridiculous.  It was obviously government-altered nanobots.  How else would anyone be able to repair the damage so quickly.

Next up...assassin bugs.

 

Quote

The robots would be activated when in the presence of the certain chemicals, or specific combinations of chemicals.

Nanothermite I would guess.

"racist, intolerant, small-minded bigot" - AND APPARENTLY A SOCIALIST

(2010) (2015)
Economic Left/Right: 8.38 3.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.13 -1.23

Posted

Every news camera in the New York area and probably thousands of private owned cameras were trained on the towers after the first aircraft hit and recorded the second aircraft hitting the tower.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted (edited)
On 4/17/2017 at 4:50 PM, bush_cheney2004 said:

There was no "nanothermite" found at the scene...that has already been debunked as "nano nonsense".

"Thermite can also be used to cut steel beams". Even an admitted amateur can do it. Just think what all those US demolition specialists can do with NANOTHERMITE!

They made the twin towers come down at accelerating speed and they brought down WTC7 at free fall speed. All three are impossible events for "hijackers" flying "planes" thru steel towers.  "Planes" disappearing like a hot knife thru butter. 

Edited by hot enough
Posted (edited)

Do any of you folks ever wonder why the jet engine found on Murray Street isn't the engine that was in the United Airlines plane that allegedly hit WTC2?

Why in heaven's name would anyone believe anything the USA says with these myriad impossibilities? The engine that blasted thru WTC2 and landed on Murrary Street was from a 747, not a 767-200, which was what UA175 was.

Edited by hot enough
Posted
33 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Do any of you folks ever wonder why the jet engine found on Murray Street isn't the engine that was in the United Airlines plane that allegedly hit WTC2?

Why in heaven's name would anyone believe anything the USA says with these myriad impossibilities? The engine that blasted thru WTC2 and landed on Murrary Street was from a 747, not a 767-200, which was what UA175 was.

Stuff like this is one of the reasons why I find the whole idea ridiculous.  They are going to perpetrate the greatest crime in the history of the US and they couldn't get their engines right?

Posted
5 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

Stuff like this is one of the reasons why I find the whole idea ridiculous.  They are going to perpetrate the greatest crime in the history of the US and they couldn't get their engines right?

You find the whole idea ridiculous because, as you have readily admitted, you have neither the patience or the smarts to figure it thru.

Posted
6 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

Stuff like this is one of the reasons why I find the whole idea ridiculous.  They are going to perpetrate the greatest crime in the history of the US and they couldn't get their engines right?

That that is true is illustrated by the fact that you don't go, "Wait a minute here, if the engine that was found sitting there on Murray Street didn't come from UA175, then there is something majorly wrong with the official story". 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

They also forgot to tell GW Bush, Silverstein, and the BBC newsreader to keep the big secret to themselves don't forget.

Planned deception can't possibly be what MLW is about, Michael. Why not take the time and the tiny bit of effort to find out if I am wrong about this huge engine dichotomy?

Posted
3 minutes ago, hot enough said:

You find the whole idea ridiculous because, as you have readily admitted, you have neither the patience or the smarts to figure it thru.

You see, this is the problem.  You have no idea how to explain away what I said, so you insult me. 

I'm smart enough to know that if there was a grain of truth in anything you say, I'd hear/read it on the news.

Posted
Just now, hot enough said:

Planned deception can't possibly be what MLW is about, Michael. Why not take the time and the tiny bit of effort to find out if I am wrong about this huge engine dichotomy?

I looked it up but it seems like a fresh falsehood so I couldn't find another side to the story.

Posted
5 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

You see, this is the problem.  You have no idea how to explain away what I said, so you insult me. 

I'm smart enough to know that if there was a grain of truth in anything you say, I'd hear/read it on the news.

No insult at all. Just what you have shown. The news, yeah right. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I looked it up but it seems like a fresh falsehood so I couldn't find another side to the story.

That's another telling remark that illustrates you have a completely closed mind, which is also the antithesis of MLW.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, hot enough said:

No insult at all. Just what you have shown. The news, yeah right. 

It is an insult.  You figure if I don't agree with you, it's because I'm not smart enough.  I could tell you why I don't agree with you, but then I would be a hypocrite, as that would be insulting you.

Probably get me some time in the cooler as well.

Edited by bcsapper
Posted
6 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

It is an insult.  You figure if I don't agree with you, it's because I'm not smart enough.  I could tell you why I don't agree with you, but then I would be a hypocrite, as that would be insulting you.

Probably get me some time in the cooler as well.

Then just address the facts as they are presented. Gather your own, ask me for more if you like. That's how things are supposed to go at MLW.

Posted
Just now, hot enough said:

Then just address the facts as they are presented. Gather your own, ask me for more if you like. That's how things are supposed to go at MLW.

No, you were right about the patience thing.  I wasn't insulted by that at all.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

That's ok.  If you have a good source for that one send it over.

The one that you can never bring yourself to mention. The one that you will ignore when presented or encourage a flurry of activity to bury it. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

That's ok.  If you have a good source for that one send it over.

I have a perfect source, you. 

"I looked it up but it seems like a fresh falsehood so I couldn't find another side to the story."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,915
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Раймо
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • MDP went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • MDP earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • MDP went up a rank
      Rookie
    • MDP earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • derek848 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...