hot enough Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 hour ago, betsy said: What did many write? Are you satisfied with this, happy about this, people writing about such evil and basically, glorifying it? "What to do ? Business as usual of course, because Canada and Canadian PMs are no strangers to their own war crimes." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted February 28, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 (edited) 19 minutes ago, hot enough said: Are you satisfied with this, happy about this, people writing about such evil and basically, glorifying it? "What to do ? Business as usual of course, because Canada and Canadian PMs are no strangers to their own war crimes." Trudeau asked for it. Taking potshots about Trump, and posting those reckless tweets. He's been asking for it. He craved for Trump's attention. I'm glad he got what he wanted. Of course, Trump cooperated with Trade because he's not punishing the whole country. He just wanted to reserve the public bitch-slap for its PM. Edited February 28, 2017 by betsy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted February 28, 2017 Report Share Posted February 28, 2017 36 minutes ago, betsy said: Trudeau asked for it. Taking potshots about Trump, and posting those reckless tweets. He's been asking for it. He craved for Trump's attention. I'm glad he got what he wanted. Agreed....Trudeau has been chasing after Trump like a lost puppy...before and after the U.S. election. Trudeau will be watching President Trump's speech tonight....on CBC LIVE ! Canadian media loves to see if a U.S. president mentions Canada in their speeches.....or doesn't mention Canada. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Yay ! President Trump mentions Canada in his speech: http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/28/politics/donald-trump-speech-transcript-full-text/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 On 2/28/2017 at 2:31 PM, betsy said: Trudeau asked for it. Taking potshots about Trump, and posting those reckless tweets. He's been asking for it. He craved for Trump's attention. I'm glad he got what he wanted. Of course, Trump cooperated with Trade because he's not punishing the whole country. He just wanted to reserve the public bitch-slap for its PM. What did Trudeau ask for and why are you 180 degrees ignoring my question? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 16 minutes ago, hot enough said: What did Trudeau ask for and why are you 180 degrees ignoring my question? About Trudeau, better review the thread. I've repeatedly talked about it already. What exactly is that question I ignored? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 15 minutes ago, betsy said: What exactly is that question I ignored? Are you satisfied with this, happy about this, people writing about such evil and basically, glorifying it? "What to do ? Business as usual of course, because Canada and Canadian PMs are no strangers to their own war crimes." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 (edited) 39 minutes ago, hot enough said: Are you satisfied with this, happy about this, people writing about such evil and basically, glorifying it? "What to do ? Business as usual of course, because Canada and Canadian PMs are no strangers to their own war crimes." Edited March 2, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 5 minutes ago, betsy said: What do you mean????? 5 minutes ago, betsy said: What do you mean????? B_C was the person who provided the quoted material. I strongly suspect that you know what quotes mean. Do you know that Trump believes explosives were used on the twin towers? Do you think that he is a "conspiracy theorist"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, hot enough said: B_C was the person who provided the quoted material. I strongly suspect that you know what quotes mean. Do you know that Trump believes explosives were used on the twin towers? Do you think that he is a "conspiracy theorist"? I don't follow everyone's post. As for Trump - I'm not familiar with his views about the towers, though I'd read that he believes in some conspiracy theory. But so what? Some people like conspiracy theories. Edited March 2, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 9 minutes ago, betsy said: I don't follow everyone's post. As for Trump - I'm not familiar with his views about the towers, though I'd read that he believes in some conspiracy theory. But so what? Some people like conspiracy theories. I've noticed that you don't follow a lot of things, Betsy. Trump stated that when he had had zero information about any conspiracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 (edited) 39 minutes ago, hot enough said: I've noticed that you don't follow a lot of things, Betsy. Trump stated that when he had had zero information about any conspiracy. I may not follow a lot of things - but I do get what I follow, and I get what I read, right. You on the other hand don't seem to get what you follow - if we'll go by what you're saying about Trump. You might as well not bother following anything at all if you're going to miss it anyway. Waste of time. . Here's what you said: Quote hot enough Do you know that Trump believes explosives were used on the twin towers? Do you think that he is a "conspiracy theorist"? I looked up what he said. Here's what he said in an interview: Quote Speaking about the tower's demise, he said: “It wasn’t architectural defect. “How could a plane, even a 767 or 747 or whatever it might have been; how could it possibly go through that steel? “I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs – bombs that exploded simultaneously. http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/566189/9-11-attacks-donald-trump-twin-bombs-world-trade-center Reminder: this was said in 2001. He was also speaking as a real estate developer. Edited March 2, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 (edited) Just look at the way the towers collapsed in that video. They collapsed from the top down! If there were explosives at the bottom, they would blow up at the bottom! Timer: 2:10 Edited March 2, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 4 minutes ago, betsy said: I looked up what he said. Here's what he said in an interview: Speaking about the tower's demise, he said: “It wasn’t architectural defect. “How could a plane, even a 767 or 747 or whatever it might have been; how could it possibly go through that steel? “I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs – bombs that exploded simultaneously. http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/566189/9-11-attacks-donald-trump-twin-bombs-world-trade-center The US government official conspiracy theory says no bombs, no explosives, no explosions despite reporters, firemen, first responders describing those, videos of explosives going off. Firemen's testimony to a secret NY city "commission" describing the explosions. Residues of high grade US military, Lawrence Livermore Labs developed, US patented 1996/97 nanothermite, built from the atomic scale up, not your average everyday thermite where the materials are ground down to fine powders, found in WTC dust. How did it get there, Betsy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 (edited) 7 minutes ago, hot enough said: The US government official conspiracy theory says no bombs, no explosives, no explosions despite reporters, firemen, first responders describing those, videos of explosives going off. Firemen's testimony to a secret NY city "commission" describing the explosions. Residues of high grade US military, Lawrence Livermore Labs developed, US patented 1996/97 nanothermite, built from the atomic scale up, not your average everyday thermite where the materials are ground down to fine powders, found in WTC dust. How did it get there, Betsy? Hahahahaha. You're the one who brought up Trump! And Trump negated what you imply! He was thinking of a different theory. Edited March 2, 2017 by betsy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 4 minutes ago, betsy said: Just look at the way the towers collapsed in that video. They collapsed from the top down! If there were explosives at the bottom, they would blow up at the bottom! There were explosives where ever explosives were needed. Had it been a real gravity collapse, the top sections would not have been turned into powder before they even contacted the lower, much much stronger section. There would have been jolts, following Newton's Conservation of Momentum. Do you find it strange that the "scientific paper" that the whole US government official conspiracy theory is based on was first published on September 13, 2001, when the WTC dust was still floating around in the air. A "scientific paper" that is totally at odds with Newtonian physics? Just look at the way WTC7 collapsed - free fall. Not possible without a controlled demolition. CD at WTC 7 means the same at the other two. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 9 minutes ago, betsy said: Hahahahaha. You brought up Trump! And Trump negated what you imply! Please do explain, Betsy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 (edited) 8 minutes ago, hot enough said: Yes, please do read, Betsy. Lots of important questions asked of you. Wait, we're on the topic The First 5. If you want to pursue your conspiracy theory, go to your Turmoil thread. There were no important questions asked.....only silly ones by someone who ignores every rebuttals that were given. Free society. Believe what you want to believe. Edited March 2, 2017 by betsy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 8 minutes ago, betsy said: Wait, we're on the topic The First 5. If you want to pursue your conspiracy theory, go to your Turmoil thread. Betsy, you are the one that brought the videos, and the Trump interview. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 Just now, hot enough said: Betsy, you are the one that brought the videos, and the Trump interview. <slap forehead> Bye bye. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dre Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 (edited) On 1/7/2017 at 7:20 AM, betsy said: He is very quiet about Canada. It's like we're not even on his radar.....which could mean we're not that significant at all in his view (which could be either good or bad). I have a gut feeling that he'll give us the silent cold treatment. It more likely reflects the fact that our relationship with the US is stable, highly beneficial to both sides, and continues smoothly without needing much attention. You dont need a lot of meeting when things are working well. You need them to fix things that are broken. Edited March 2, 2017 by dre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 2, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, dre said: It more likely reflects the fact that our relationship with the US is stable, highly beneficial to both sides, and continues smoothly without needing much attention. You dont need a lot of meeting when things are working well. You need them to fix things that are broken. After the public bitch-slapping, all's well now with Trump, I suppose. Looks like Trudeau has been saying the right words, and must've been only too eager to comply, since Trump seems pleased with him now. See? He was even mentioned at the Congress speech....kinda like a treat for being obedient. In the end.....Trudeau's been taught how to heel. Edited March 2, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 17 minutes ago, betsy said: In the end.....Trudeau's been taught how to heel. Agreed...Trudeau needs Trump a lot more than Trump needs Trudeau. American networks do not provide live coverage of Trudeau speeches in Canada. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 " American networks do not provide live coverage of Trudeau speeches in Canada." ================ American networks do not provide live or delayed coverage of anything except the US propaganda stream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 On 3/2/2017 at 4:19 PM, hot enough said: American networks do not provide live or delayed coverage of anything except the US propaganda stream. Canadian networks not only provide live streams of U.S. politicians, but much of the content programming is American as well. Trump speech ? CBC LIVE !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.