jacee Posted May 14, 2016 Report Posted May 14, 2016 Depends on your concept of race. The idea of black v. white as race is silly. I'm opposed to all immigration except maybe spouses and a few very excellent specialists who can bring something exceptional to Canada or who are chosen by communities. Not very realistic. And we do have to accommodate people pushed off their land/out of their country for resisting Canadian corporate operations overseas. That's the political payoff by our governments I guess. .
DogOnPorch Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 You want to discriminate by religion for immigration? . The West spent the last 1400 years keeping Islam out for a reason. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
GostHacked Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 (edited) Muslims are like trolls, no matter how much you try to keep them out ...... /sarcasm Edited May 15, 2016 by GostHacked
DogOnPorch Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 Meh...Islam's track record speaks for itself. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
GostHacked Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 Meh...Islam's track record speaks for itself. As does yours.
DogOnPorch Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 As does yours. Whatever that means. You're free to deny Islam's history. It won't change the fact that it was spread by the sword...and continues to be. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
G Huxley Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 "Not very realistic."It's not realistic to defend one's borders? How come it's very realistic for Japan and other countries? "And we do have to accommodate people pushed off their land/out of their country for resisting Canadian corporate operations overseas." No, we should deal with those Canadian corporations.
GostHacked Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 Whatever that means. You're free to deny Islam's history. It won't change the fact that it was spread by the sword...and continues to be. You are also free to think any way you want. not that it's the right line of thinking. Anyways, wtf was this thread about?
GostHacked Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 Whatever that means. You're free to deny Islam's history. It won't change the fact that it was spread by the sword...and continues to be. You are also free to think any way you want. not that it's the right line of thinking. Anyways, wtf was this thread about?
G Huxley Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 (edited) Whatever that means. You're free to deny Islam's history. It won't change the fact that it was spread by the sword...and continues to be. It also spreads by massive family sizes. So mathematically Islam will win out. Edited May 15, 2016 by G Huxley
jacee Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 (edited) The West spent the last 1400 years keeping Islam out for a reason.And Jews until recent decades too.What's your point? Because we did ... means we should? . Edited May 15, 2016 by jacee
DogOnPorch Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 And Jews until recent decades too. What's your point? . Islam is not compatible with Western values like equality between sexes...freedom of speech...etc. You're free to pretend it is. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
G Huxley Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 (edited) And Jews until recent decades too. What's your point? Because we did ... means we should? . If it worked for 1000 years, it's probably a tried tested and true strategy. Why try to fix a system if it isn't broken? Why do you want more religious people in Canada? Why not more atheists? Edited May 15, 2016 by G Huxley
GostHacked Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 Islam is not compatible with Western values like equality between sexes...freedom of speech...etc. You're free to pretend it is. Yeah it's not like the 1950's in the USA/Canada where women knew their place.
DogOnPorch Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 Yeah it's not like the 1950's in the USA/Canada where women knew their place. The 1960s happened. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
GostHacked Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 The 1960s happened. Give it time, the War on Terror is not an overnight thing.
DogOnPorch Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 To add....the hard fought victories of the Women's Liberation Movement will be rolled back. Woman's rights are now subservient to other Left Wing mega-causes. Get back in the kitchen...woman. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
G Huxley Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 To add....the hard fought victories of the Women's Liberation Movement will be rolled back. Woman's rights are now subservient to other Left Wing mega-causes. Get back in the kitchen...woman. Well to be fair since it seems females are for open borders it would be only a logical result of what they themselves supported.
GostHacked Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 To add....the hard fought victories of the Women's Liberation Movement will be rolled back. Woman's rights are now subservient to other Left Wing mega-causes. Get back in the kitchen...woman. That's why we have the new feminism coupled with MGTOW. Seems like feminists want men to stop being men.
jacee Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 It is not a fantasy at all. PEOPLE have improved your life and mine in innumerable ways..... from the way that you dispose of your bodily wastes, to the way allowing you to express your thoughts to the entire world on this forum... are all infrastructures invented, engineered, and built by people... more specifically: by the CO-OPERATION of people. To call people a "scourge" is cynicism of the highest order. What is YOUR fantasy? Some nice global catastrophe to rid the earth of them once and for all? ... I called the Vatican and the Catholic church a scourge, not PEOPLE. .
jacee Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 If it worked for 1000 years, it's probably a tried tested and true strategy. Why try to fix a system if it isn't broken? Why do you want more religious people in Canada? Why not more atheists? Why judge people for immigration based on their religion at all? Most of us are agnostic. .
jacee Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 Islam is not compatible with Western values like equality between sexes...freedom of speech...etc. You're free to pretend it is. Ah ... Now we're going to judge immigrants on their views about gender roles too? I can tell you that quite a few posters here wouldn't qualify. :-) Once we apply all of your rules to deport all Canadians who don't qualify, there will be none of us left ... including you! .
jacee Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 To add....the hard fought victories of the Women's Liberation Movement will be rolled back. Woman's rights are now subservient to other Left Wing mega-causes. Get back in the kitchen...woman. The victories are about women making their own choices. Men like you are still trying to tell us what we 'should' think/do though ... too dense to grasp the meaning of 'choice'? .
G Huxley Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 Why judge people for immigration based on their religion at all? Most of us are agnostic. . Because religion is a major problem in the world.
jacee Posted May 15, 2016 Report Posted May 15, 2016 (edited) Because religion is a major problem in the world.So we kick out everyone who has a religion?Lol We figured this out a while back: It's called 'freedom of religion'. And freedom from religious discrimination. . Edited May 15, 2016 by jacee
Recommended Posts