Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sure is....it demonstrates just what all those taxes in Canada can't always deliver (pun intended).

It's definitely rather rich to see somebody boasting about a healthcare system that relies on other countries to help with its inadequacies..

  • Replies 323
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Further to this point....rich B.C./Vancouver is so great it has to send preemies to hospitals in....Washington state.

yup... in 2007... given a lack of available trained neonatal nursing staff. I understand the 2007 gap has been met - carry on! :lol:

.

Posted

Then why is Trudeau lowering taxes ? Canada only has one major coast-coast highway, and it ain't that great.

And that's a function of past spending, not current.

Posted

/facepalm

Canada can buy excess capacity when needed. It doesn't require us to spend money to build excess capacity for the rest of the time.

Posted

Canada has always had higher taxes than the US, but pretty much the same rate of growth. If you want to see what low taxes buys, move to Somalia.

Why? You think Somalia is the way it is because they're taxes are too low? /facepalm

Posted

But there are better wealth distribution tools favoured to families in Canada - it's in the G&M article that BC posted.

That's the point........I want less of my wealth to be redistributed by Government and what I get to keep, I want to spend less on the cost of living, and that is a major motivation for many Canadians to move to the United States.......

Posted

Not at all, you're the one citing Vancouver as an example of affordability.

Actually, if you read what I wrote, I said people are moving their at more than double the rate, despite higher costs. There are obviously other factors.

You don't consider the United States a "civilization"? Some how, the Americans are managing with lower taxes and lower costs of living....

The US has more long term money issues to deal with.

Posted

That's the point........I want less of my wealth to be redistributed by Government and what I get to keep, I want to spend less on the cost of living, and that is a major motivation for many Canadians to move to the United States.......

And most Canadians disagree. That's what democracy and responsible government is about.

Posted

And most Canadians disagree. That's what democracy and responsible government is about.

Because most Canadians wouldn't garner an advantage moving to the United States, because they get "free stuff" in Canada.

Posted

....The US has more long term money issues to deal with.

...and the US actually has far more infrastructure and capacity for those expenditures and debt. Canada has higher taxes....to get less.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Actually, if you read what I wrote, I said people are moving their at more than double the rate, despite higher costs. There are obviously other factors.

Such as? And what is the average income of said people?

The US has more long term money issues to deal with.

Then why is the Canadian dollar tanking in comparison?

Posted

Why? You think Somalia is the way it is because they're taxes are too low? /facepalm

I think that taxes are necessary to pay for proper social infrastructure.

Posted

Then why do so many snowbirds retire to the USA ? They don't count once they leave ?

It's about the temperature, I would think.

Posted (edited)

Such as? And what is the average income of said people?

you tell me. You're the one moving the goal post.

Then why is the Canadian dollar tanking in comparison?

Because the USD is still the reserve currency of the world.

Edited by Smallc
Posted

Temperature is part of Canada, but so are higher taxes.

Because Canadians like it that way overall. Canadians will set up their country as they wish it to be.

Posted

Because Canadians like it that way overall. Canadians will set up their country as they wish it to be.

I know....they will eschew what is bad (higher taxes, higher cost of living, "temperature", etc.) for what they like in the USA.

Even the long-haul Canadian truckers prefer using U.S. highways.

So go ahead and play the progressive/regressive taxes shell game....it won't really matter in the end.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

you tell me. You're the one moving the goal post.

I told you, foreign ownership.......that is not moving the goal posts, but fact. Vancouver is one of the most expensive places on the planet to purchase real estate, and is hardly representative of middle income Canadians.

Because the USD is still the reserve currency of the world.

And because investors don't see Canada as a good investment opportunity.......quite the opposite, edge of the abyss is more apt.

Posted (edited)

I told you, foreign ownership.......that is not moving the goal posts, but fact. Vancouver is one of the most expensive places on the planet to purchase real estate, and is hardly representative of middle income Canadians.

You're telling me that it was all rich investors that increased the population by nearly 10% in 5 years? Sure.

And because investors don't see Canada as a good investment opportunity.......quite the opposite, edge of the abyss is more apt.

You're about the only person predicting edge of the abyss type stuff. This slowdown will be of medium length, and isn't unique to Canada.

Australia has lower taxes than Canada, and yet is in a worse situation.

Edited by Smallc
Posted (edited)

I don't know. I'm sure you have the answer.

Too many. I've met a lot of them. Degrees from a lot of third world countries aren't worth the paper they're printed on. Employers here don't even know if these degrees or real, or earned (cheating and bribery are endemic in much of the third world) much less whether the university which allegedly granted them has courses that are comparable to what is found in western countries. It isn't exactly unknown for potential employers to discover during testing and interview that their immigrant subject knows almost nothing about his alleged area of expertise. Then there's the language issue. The higher the job you're applying for, the higher your communications skills are expected to be. Heavily accented, hesitant English, with poor writing and comprehension isn't going to get you many higher level jobs in Canada.

Edited by Argus

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Let's try this again using some reasonable numbers (I'm doing back of the envelope here using online tax calculators as a rough guide due to the fact that I'm lazy as f^ck).

So, let's say hitops is making $250,000 CDN right now and is in BC. His taxes would be around $91,000 assuming no RRSP's and he's single etc. So net take home pay $151,000.

Let's say that if he went to Wyoming he would make the equivalent of $500,000 or about $350k USD at current FX rates (I'm rounding for simplicity here as differences are immaterial).

US tax leads to about $97,000 according to an online calculator (I don't do US taxes so I presume this is a maximum amount equivalent to what I've done with the BC tax calculation above). So net in USD is $253k which is equivalent to about $361,000 CDN net of tax.

So, just so I have this correct, based on the OP, hitops is considering leaving Canada because of a tax increase of about $1,300 but has not left already due to a net take home pay increase of $203,000.

That $1,300 increase is based on the 1.5% saving on the 22% tax rate on incomes between ~$44,000 and $89,000 versus the 4% point increase for income above $200,000.

Now, I understand cognitive dissonance when it comes to financial decisions. I love reading about and see it all the time in my business with clients and as I maintain my personal investment portfolio.

Which is why I have taken the time to point all this out in such detail.

It is cognitive dissonance to make a big deal about $1,300 per year when one should have moved long ago to take advantage of the hundreds of thousands of dollars per year of benefits from making that 100%+ more increase in earnings.

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,905
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Henry Blackstone
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...