Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Took a quick look and I will be back to read more. Interesting article.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

then give "another side"... or attempt to refute your claimed "one sided" - yes?

Oh yes, because a website run by Ed Broadbent's think tank is bound to be fair when it comes to conservatives, though as biased as you are, you probably believe that it is. Trying to refute left wing nonsense is like pulling weeds, they will just grow back, and are often not worth the effort, and frankly anything you might support is something reasonable people shouldn't.

Posted

Oh yes, because a website run by Ed Broadbent's think tank is bound to be fair when it comes to conservatives, though as biased as you are, you probably believe that it is. Trying to refute left wing nonsense is like pulling weeds, they will just grow back, and are often not worth the effort, and frankly anything you might support is something reasonable people shouldn't.

Then try refuting the issues mentioned in the article instead of wasting time pulling weeds.

Posted

Oh yes, because a website run by Ed Broadbent's think tank is bound to be fair when it comes to conservatives, though as biased as you are, you probably believe that it is. Trying to refute left wing nonsense is like pulling weeds, they will just grow back, and are often not worth the effort, and frankly anything you might support is something reasonable people shouldn't.

if it's so, as you imply, biased and unfair... it should be very easy-peasy for you to refute... now get to it - chop, chop! :lol:

Posted

Then try refuting the issues mentioned in the article instead of wasting time pulling weeds.

It's funny how the article only mentioned the untruths of Harper. The other 3 - pure as snow.

Posted

Now since I spent some time on it, it is one sided.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

Then try refuting the issues mentioned in the article instead of wasting time pulling weeds.

The entire site is dedicated to getting the NDP elected, would you accept anything from a similar conservative website?

Posted (edited)

Not one sided at all.

An anti conservative propaganda web site with no names behind it.

Edited by Argus

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/ndp-was-paying-some-punjabi-phone-canvassers-13-four-bucks-less-than-their-english-counterparts

Here you go, this is real, actually happened, not only did they pay a certain type of person less, they also paid those people less then they claim the minimum wage should be, so much for leftist principles, but I posted that in a status update, and immediately two true beleivers show up to claim it's no big deal.....ok, but you want to use an Ed Broadbent think tank, dedicated to getting the NDP elected website, as a source of unbiased information, you people just can't be for real.

Posted

Ah, the Broadbent Institute. It's a wonder they didn't want to state on the site who was behind it.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

The Broadbent Institute and union loving Rabble. No wonder so many people here like Mighty Ac and waldo are so grossly misinformed; people believe this nonsense to be true. Canadians are becoming so complacent, and quite simply, dumb and ignorant.

Thankful to have become a free thinker.

Posted

OK then, so nobody's refuting anything in the article. On we go.

seems so... of course one can count on those who simply choose to instead attempt to distract by mentioning the source... or the standard trolling gratuitous reference to a Canadian source referencing an American source

Posted

One can....especially the latter.

The NDP has been getting a free pass for decades, but now because of the negativity in the electorate they have the protest vote, inflating their numbers. The election campaign still has a long way to go, so now they will get more scrutiny, the free pass is over. Ultimately in an election it comes down to who is more consistent, has more realistic policies, runs a disciplined no gaff local and national campaign.

Thankful to have become a free thinker.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,921
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    henryjhon123
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • LinkSoul60 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • LinkSoul60 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...