Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

She's in remission? After Jesus told her everything was going to be okay? I might have to rethink my deathbed conversion plan.

It's not about Jesus. If you believe that, than you missed the families point.

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I don't think you read all the supporting material regarding her case. I did. And I stand by my opinion. Let's leave it up to the family. I do surprise my statements from time to time, but this time, I am sticking to my beliefs.

people here are acting like they refused treatment outright from the beginning. She underwent a full round of chemo,suffered the side effects that put her into the ICU, and is now refusing to undergo further treatments. That doesn't sound like insane religious fanatics that refuse to recognize the legitimacy of modern medicine. That's not incompetent parents. If they were incompetent,they wouldn't have given her chemo in the first place.
Posted

people here are acting like they refused treatment outright from the beginning. She underwent a full round of chemo,suffered the side effects that put her into the ICU, and is now refusing to undergo further treatments. That doesn't sound like insane religious fanatics that refuse to recognize the legitimacy of modern medicine. That's not incompetent parents. If they were incompetent,they wouldn't have given her chemo in the first place.

I agree!!!!

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

I don't think you read all the supporting material regarding her case. I did. And I stand by my opinion. Let's leave it up to the family. I do surprise my statements from time to time, but this time, I am sticking to my beliefs.

I'm not quite sure what you mean. Not to worry.

Posted

It's not about Jesus. If you believe that, than you missed the families point.

Yeah, that was a joke.

Posted

I don't think you read all the supporting material regarding her case. I did. And I stand by my opinion. Let's leave it up to the family. I do surprise my statements from time to time, but this time, I am sticking to my beliefs.

I noted that Family Services and the provincial board of professionals assigned to assess and intervene in these cases both declined to do so.

Science too hard for you? Try religion!

Posted (edited)

But all the grandams were crying....

what a huge victory for aboriginal rights.... the right to let your child die because you're superstitious...

It's an even bigger victory for Christianity I would think. That's the superstition in this case.

It'll remain to be seen if this is an exclusive native right until such time the state ponders whether to intervene in the case of a sick non-native kid.

Edited by eyeball

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted

The issue has been settled - temporarily. I hope the young lady does well and never needs chemo again. Having said that, if the remission is temporary and the child ends up succumbing to cancer then the fingers will start to point. Who, or what agency will be held responsible either morally or criminally, for the death? I hope we never have to find out.

Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.

Posted

There are all kinds of Christians who go through chemo. I don't understand your comment, eyeball.

I'm sorry, I forgot to include the quote (Squid's) that hopefully puts some context to my comment.

I'm pretty sure non-native Christians who have have found themselves supporting fellow non-native Christians in similar situations who have run afoul of Child Services in the past will be certain to cite this case the next time it's them facing this choice/decision.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted (edited)

Well, if those Christians allow their child to undergo chemo, the child has effects serious enough to put him/her into ICU, the cancer goes into remission and they decide they won't ever go through chemo again, then those Christians would have a comparable situation. A Christian who refuses treatment from the outset may not be considered competent. The key component in the aboriginal girl's case, imo, is that she had chemo. She experienced it and those experiences led to her subsequently refusing treatment. It's not like she refused treatment from the start because God would save her or some such nonsense.

Edited by cybercoma

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...