Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Last month marked the 10th anniversary of the Canadian led plot to overthrow Haiti's democratically elected president and supplant the ruling government with UN oversight. Known as the “Ottawa Initiative on Haiti”, the coup plot was a year in development as complicity and resources from France and the U.S. were recruited.

...In a September 2004 interview with Haiti Solidarity activist Anthony Fenton, Paradis explained that “there was one thematic that went under the whole meeting [Ottawa Initiative]… the responsibility to protect.” A showpiece of the Liberal Party’s foreign policy, the responsibility to protect doctrine asserts that where gross human rights abuses are occurring, it is the duty of the international community to intervene, over and above considerations of state sovereignty.

....The Ottawa initiative on Haiti helped consolidate the international forces – particularly the US, France and Canada - that planned and carried out the coup. It’s a unique event in the annals of Canadian foreign-policy history and for that reason alone, should be investigated by the media.

http://yvesengler.com/2014/01/24/when-canada-plotted-to-over-haitis-government/

It is interesting to revisit the anniversary of this episode in Canadian foreign policy given current events in Ukraine/Crimea. Was Canada operating according to "international law", and were R2P objectives achieved ?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

It's a dark day for us Canadians to remember. It also makes us appropriate and legitimate targets of Haitian terrorism. We will have deserved it.

Posted

Post coup, Prime Minister Paul Martin met with interim President Boniface Alexandre and business representatives. Pro democracy groups were persecuted in the interest of near term stability and security, without which, the promised Canadian aid would not flow to Haiti.

119716.jpg

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Last month marked the 10th anniversary of the Canadian led plot to overthrow Haiti's democratically elected president and supplant the ruling government with UN oversight. Known as the “Ottawa Initiative on Haiti”, the coup plot was a year in development as complicity and resources from France and the U.S. were recruited.

...In a September 2004 interview with Haiti Solidarity activist Anthony Fenton, Paradis explained that “there was one thematic that went under the whole meeting [Ottawa Initiative]… the responsibility to protect.” A showpiece of the Liberal Party’s foreign policy, the responsibility to protect doctrine asserts that where gross human rights abuses are occurring, it is the duty of the international community to intervene, over and above considerations of state sovereignty.

....The Ottawa initiative on Haiti helped consolidate the international forces – particularly the US, France and Canada - that planned and carried out the coup. It’s a unique event in the annals of Canadian foreign-policy history and for that reason alone, should be investigated by the media.

http://yvesengler.com/2014/01/24/when-canada-plotted-to-over-haitis-government/

It is interesting to revisit the anniversary of this episode in Canadian foreign policy given current events in Ukraine/Crimea. Was Canada operating according to "international law", and were R2P objectives achieved ?

No we needed to get into Haiti to crack open that huge;y wealthy Haitian bank and take the proceeds. And of course America was a bit too busy at the time waging an illegal war in Iraq, which our PM at the time said NO to because it was illegal. Maybe clean up your own doorstep before you try messing up others.

Posted

The evidence for this is quite overwhelming, as three "partners in democracy" (Canada, France, the U.S.) decided that democracy is little more than an irritant. It is an especially strong exposure of Canadian foreign policy hypocrisy.

I agree with Shady that, by our own standards, it could be reasonably argued that we be subject to attack (had Haiti the means and the will, that is); France and the United States would also be legitimate targets under this formulation.

Food for thought, as they say.

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

Posted

Food for thought, as they say.

yes, it is... it has been. What it also is, as you say, was an eventual collective action taken by, "partners in democracy" (Canada, France, the U.S.), one with a significant years pre-coup planning/investment lead-up of installed/propped up puppet government, one acted out through multiple U.S. administrations. What it wasn't... was the framing intent of this OP to attach/associate lead versus complicity.

Posted

Oh, sure, that was transparent, and I consciously chose to ignore the implication. But the larger story is certainly significant, and Canada's role can hardly be downplayed.

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

Posted

The underlying story is that this thread is trolling for effete Canadians who aren't as proud of the fact that Canada is a scum bag nation with morals that are no better and little different than the trolls, who of course, are as proud as punch of their's.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

The underlying story is that this thread is trolling for effete Canadians who aren't as proud of the fact that Canada is a scum bag nation with morals that are no better and little different than the trolls, who of course, are as proud as punch of their's.

Agreed, except for the scum bag part.

Posted

I see BC wasn't able to troll enough angry Canadians in the Ukraine topics so has started a separate topic in hopes of pulling in more.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

If anniversaries of significant domestic or foreign policy events are good enough for the "Evil Satan" here at MLW, then they are good enough for Canada as well. Frankly, I was quite surprised to learn just how much Canada planned and lead this action for Haiti, as well as the post coup police actions with troops that negatively impacted some Haitians. I suppose all of this was conveniently lost in the subsequent earthquake disaster.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

I see BC wasn't able to troll enough angry Canadians in the Ukraine topics so has started a separate topic in hopes of pulling in more.

Off topic...derail. Please stay on topic here and in the Ukraine thread(s).

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

How did Canada's 2004 coup in Haiti aid or hinder the Liberal Party in elections ? Was it a factor in the serious turfing that occurred in addition to Adscam ? Is R2P still a core value of the Liberal Party of Canada, complete with books from Michael Ignatieff ?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted (edited)

R2P is on the surface a notion with which very few liberals (Western, not just Canadian) feel is disputable. But that's because Western liberals tend to take the myths of benign intervention (and benign imperialism, since Ignatieff was brought up) at face value, having "learned" that nationalistic masturbation is a high virtue Discussed By Very Serious Men.

But when engaged in actually-serious debate and discussion, and without a chorus of talented interventionist fistfighters like Christopher Hitchens to back them up, they tend to get pummelled in debate.

I read with interest a debate between R2P-enthusiast Ian Williams (UK) versus a still-living fistfighter, Noam Chomsky (US) on this subject in Foreign Policy in Focus. At the time, I was quite ready to side with Williams, but I think it's pretty apparent that Chomsky more or less eats him for breakfast.

He comes out somewhat ahead on the question of Kosovo; and absolutely destroys Williams on the discussion about East Timor.

Others might disagree with my assessment, so I leave it for people to decide for themselves:

http://www.chomsky.info/debates/20090803.htm

Edited by bleeding heart

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

Posted

R2P is on the surface a notion with which very few liberals (Western, not just Canadian) feel is disputable.

No doubt true, but liberal convictions aside, R2P has been co-opted to achieve the very same goals as outright imperialism, as was certainly the case in 2003-2004 Haiti. The darker ambition of R2P was revealed as it was absent in the case of Rwanda, for obvious reason(s).

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Oh, I agree, BC, without reservation. It's interesting to watch people tie themselves into knots trying to explain little tiny matters like Haiti away....but more often, they choose simply not to discuss it at all. In my more generous moments, I think those are splendid times for self-reflection, to navigate which cows are Sacred, and which are "sacred."

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...