Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

BC I think what you are seeing is a primal fear and therefore morbid fascination with blood and therefore death and violence.

I believe it is why there are so many more movies depicting violence then love and why we love contact sports. That blood causes us fear ,anxiety and a rush. Bull, cock, pit bull fighting, boxing, UFC, on and on. I believe it triggers off a gang frenzy or high at the sight of blood. We call that spectator sports but you see it in war and street riots, gang violence or one on one rape and other batteries.

To me violence is as a primal weakness and we have to learn to repress it just as we have to learn to repress our violent tendencies period. I believe the same thing that makes us violent came in handy when we were all hunters or in danger of being eaten by predators or attacked by other primate packs for territory and breeding mates but today is for obvious reasons problematic.

Today's alpha males become CEO's, athletes, and the guy who makes you his bitch in prison.

This guy on trial is another Lance Armstrong or OJ or Michael Vick. He took himself seriously and became too inflated with self importance.

Now he will end up in prison where he belongs and die of a bladder infection after being long forgotten.

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

The police, much like the criminal justice system in South Africa is horrible. Anyone who thinks SA criminal justice system is competent is blowing smoke out their ass and didnt bother to check up on facts.

http://www.issafrica.org/iss-today/the-problem-with-south-african-criminal-justice-performance-indicators

Other tid bits?

The door to the washroom.....sat in a cops office, anyone could see it and tamper with it. Result? Under investigation and cross examined, the cop could not tell anyone why there are marks on the door that werent there the night of the murder.

Prosecution said he was in his prosthetics when he shot, of course there own expert witness said no, he was on his stumps.

He may walk, and I can see why.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Nancy Grace brings her hard-hitting brand of journalism to the Pistorius case!

-k

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)

Posted

The door to the washroom.....sat in a cops office, anyone could see it and tamper with it. Result? Under investigation and cross examined, the cop could not tell anyone why there are marks on the door that werent there the night of the murder.

Prosecution said he was in his prosthetics when he shot, of course there own expert witness said no, he was on his stumps.

He may walk, and I can see why.

What difference do new marks on the door make? What difference does it make whether he was in his prosthetics or not? He fired multiple shots through a closed bathroom door and only a complete moron would doubt he knew his wife was inside.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

What difference do new marks on the door make?

Oh ok...its called the chain of evidence and it is supposed to be very tight. The door has new marking s on it when viewed in court. That creates a huge hole for the Prosecution , it puts evidence into doubt.

Ask OJ if he is glad evidence was contaminated? (well maybe not now since hes in a world of hurt but 10 yrs ago?)

What difference does it make whether he was in his prosthetics or not?

It goes to the defence saying he woke up heard noises and did something.

So if he put his prothetics on , it goes to the Prosecutions idea that it was premeditated. Meaning he woke up, put them on , and went and shot her. But his stumps were bloody meaning he woke and moved around on his stumps.

The same can be illustrated easily, if you wake up to screaming or some other major disturbance, including thinking a burglary/robbery is in progress Im thinking that taking your time to dress and tie up your shoes isnt something that will be done.

He fired multiple shots through a closed bathroom door and only a complete moron would doubt he knew his wife was inside.

No Q he fired the shots, but knowing his GF was in there isnt something I am ready to convict over.

When the prosecution screws up this bad, I wont put any guarentees on anything.

Posted

After listening to the coverage of this case, I no longer think this is a slam dunk for the prosecution. On the other hand, this is to be determined by a judge and two associates. A jury may have come to the conclusion that there is doubt as to his guilt.

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

Trial is back on today. After listening to Oscar's testimony on the stand, sounds like he took on a lot of his mother's anxiety when it comes to breakins. Could explain his paranoid actions.

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

Oh ok...its called the chain of evidence and it is supposed to be very tight. The door has new marking s on it when viewed in court. That creates a huge hole for the Prosecution , it puts evidence into doubt.

How? Has he denied shooting through the door? Nope. Has he denied shooting four times through the door? Nope. Has he denied breaking down the door? Nope.

So what exactly does the door tell us? It tells us someone shot through it four times then broke it. So what exactly is in doubt with regard to the door?

So if he put his prothetics on , it goes to the Prosecutions idea that it was premeditated. Meaning he woke up, put them on , and went and shot her. But his stumps were bloody meaning he woke and moved around on his stumps.

Again, so what? Either it was planned, which I doubt, or he was in an angry rage. Either way, he's guilty.

No Q he fired the shots, but knowing his GF was in there isnt something I am ready to convict over.

In order to believe his simply incredible story, you have to believe two virtually impossible things. The first thing is that on hearing a noise, he immediately grabbed his gun and jumped out of bed -- without even thinking to check his wife. Ridiculous. Absurd. You hear a strange noise, without even thinking about it, your head turns to the side to see if your partner is there. If she isn't, then no problem. And in almost all cases, the noise will be your partner, which is why this is so natural when two people live together alone. So you have to believe he not only did not instinctively check, but that as he got up and got his gun, he didn't even think to check. Ludicrous.

The second impossible thing you have to believe, is that, now armed, he hurried to the bathroom and instantly, without calling out, fired multiple times through the door. Honestly, who does that? You've got a gun. The door is closed. You call out. You say something like "I've got a gun and the police have been called!". You don't blindly run up to the door and start shooting through it!

He's as guilty as sin, and all his sniveling and bawling won't change the facts.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

It will be interesting to hear more from him on cross. That's if he stops crying. Is his crying for himself or her?

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

I tend to agree. Since you would know even being disturbed from sleep that once you focused enough to recall where the gun is etc. you would also recall there are 2 of you in the house, so where's my partner? And even if you assume he was paranoid enough not to check her whereabouts first, hauling off and firing 4 quick rounds through the bathroom door would suggest guilt of "reckless homicide" as opposed to pre meditated, which I understand also exists in SA law.

Posted

couple of things, the door not being kept under lock and key can be dismissed by the court (doubt it will be) as it has been tainted.

Second, he lives in S Africa, one of the most dangerous and violent places on earth, especially for a wealthy guy.

DO I think he is guilty? Pretty much but not convinced.

Posted

I assume that the South African legal system is the same as ours where all that is required for an acquittal is a "reasonable doubt". It does not take much to present a "reasonable doubt." Besides, what is reasonable to one is not necessarily reasonable to another.

Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.

Posted

I assume that the South African legal system is the same as ours where all that is required for an acquittal is a "reasonable doubt". It does not take much to present a "reasonable doubt." Besides, what is reasonable to one is not necessarily reasonable to another.

And what is reasonable to a jury could be quite different to what is reasonable to a judge and 2 associates.

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

And what is reasonable to a jury could be quite different to what is reasonable to a judge and 2 associates.

I fully agree!! So, does a small group of 3 people educated in the finer points of law present a better chance of acquittal for Oscar than would a group of 12 who are prone to emotional responses?

Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.

Posted

I fully agree!! So, does a small group of 3 people educated in the finer points of law present a better chance of acquittal for Oscar than would a group of 12 who are prone to emotional responses?

That has been my question all along! I am so very curious as to the judges findings.

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

Many years ago, when I was still working for a living, I had been selected twice for a jury duty pool in Toronto. I had been chosen as a potential jury member on 3 different criminal trials. I was challenged and rejected by the prosecution in all cases. Later it was explained to me by a friend in the legal profession that it was my background in education that made the prosecution wary. She told me that it is perceived that people in certain professions have a tendency to be more "pragmatic", unemotional and analytical in their decision making. Consequently, they tended to find more "reasonable doubts" that favoured the defense. So I've been told.

Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Well, the trial is back on and will likely wrap up next week. I don't think this is a slam dunk for the prosecution due to Oscar's oscar winning performance!

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

yes, you are sort of right. I heard today that the prosecutors want him evaluated by psychiatrists, due to his anxiety levels. Twists and turns in this trial!

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

  • 3 months later...
Posted (edited)

Looks like his verdict will be delivered tomorrow by judge and no jury. It is interesting the way the verdict will be delivered:

The Judge must show why she and her two legal advisors reached their decisions. She will give a summary of each of the 37 witnesses and give her assessment of each witness and what was accepted and rejected.

It could lead into Friday as well. It is an interesting legal process and unlike anything I have seen in Canada.

Edited by WestCoastRunner
I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted
WestCoastRunner, on 10 Sept 2014 - 8:24 PM, said:

Looks like his verdict will be delivered tomorrow by judge and no jury. It is interesting the way the verdict will be delivered:

The Judge must show why she and her two legal advisors reached their decisions. She will give a summary of each of the 37 witnesses and give her assessment of each witness and what was accepted and rejected.

It could lead into Friday as well. It is an interesting legal process and unlike anything I have seen in Canada.

Posted

The guy is guilty as sin - lock him up and throw away the key!

The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so. - Ronald Reagan


I have said that the Western world is just as violent as the Islamic world - Dialamah


Europe seems to excel at fooling people to immigrate there from the ME only to chew them up and spit them back. - Eyeball


Unfortunately our policies have contributed to retarding and limiting their (Muslim's) society's natural progression towards the same enlightened state we take for granted. - Eyeball


Posted

I can't quite get my head around how he would grab the gun from under the bed without making sure where she was, or at least was not.

I agree, however, there is no jury. Will the judge ask the same questions as you and I?

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...