waldo Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Sorry - generalized statements mean nothing. What *specific* conclusions are you talking about? That the world is warming and humans are a contributing cause? Well I agree. That CO2 is a GHG? I agree too. That our knowledge of the consequences of increased CO2 is certain enough to justify causing real harm today? I don't agree. nice! Once again, you weasel word it... as you've done in the past, you refuse to accept that humans are the principal contributing factor. Let me try once again... let me ask you to state what your alternative principal cause is? In the past you've refused to respond to this request. Apparently, it's a problem for you. what "real harm today" are you claiming now? That taking initiatives to increase the percentage of alternative sourced energy... that's harmful? That working toward binding emission reduction commitments... that's harmful? That eliminating all subsidies for fossil-fuels... that's harmful? C'mon, step up... explain yourself... just what is the "real harm today" you're so concerned over? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.