cybercoma Posted June 28, 2014 Report Share Posted June 28, 2014 Red herring tactic. Sigh, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology It is only sufficient to show that a belief is the most justified to act on that belief; it is not necessary to prove without doubt that a belief is true. There has been no change in my position. You are just confused because people using skeptical language and thinking non-dogmatically is foreign to you. Both claims mean basically the same thing and the former (in the absence of contrary evidence) justifies the latter. More philosophical garbage. Get on with the debate. Nobody cares about epistemology or logical fallacies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.