Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Whats off track is the idea that a regime thats fighting for its survival is going to change its behavior because of a few cruise missiles.

Oh, they are only going to use 4 cruise missiles? And no jets, eh? Maybe you're right then.

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

If Syria wasn't facing military intervention from the US and allies, would they have so easily agreed to Russia's terms?

Would Russia have played at diplomacy?

Posted

Oh, they are only going to use 4 cruise missiles? And no jets, eh? Maybe you're right then.

No the estimates I heard were more like a bombardment lasting a couple of days with a couple of hundred cruise missiles.

I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger

Posted

If Syria wasn't facing military intervention from the US and allies, would they have so easily agreed to Russia's terms?

What was Syria really facing? After a couple of days Obama decides that unlike the Libya military strikes where he didn't get congress approval, he should for Syria. That was a tell that he was getting cold feet, and any political analyst would say so to Assad, because it's common knowledge that congress loves to deep six anything Obama's trying to get through. So at that point, Syria's chances of getting bombed were getting pretty small.

Do you know how the idea of Syria giving up control of their chemical weapons came about? An offhand throw away comment from Kerry when he was ad-libbing:

Russia jumped on a hypothetical comment by Kerry, who told reporters in London that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad could avert a threatened U.S. attack by turning over “every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week.” While Kerry added immediately that Assad “isn’t about to do it, and it can’t be done, obviously,” the idea took on a life of its own.

That's kind of funny that the reporter says the idea "took on a life of its own", when in fact Russia and Syria gave life to the idea, and now Putin is in the driver's seat on the Syria issue, not Obama. I contend that Russia's proposal on this has made a congressional approval for military strikes impossible, and it was partly done with that in mind.

Will we ever even see a congressional vote now?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,018
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Dealsshutter
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...