Jump to content

London calling for Porn Clampdown


Guest Derek L

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Stephen Colbert addressed this story last night.

Apparently the 3rd page of London's Sun actually has naked ladies. Step your game up Toronto Sun!!!!!

He compared asking your IP for porn to Oliver Twist asking for more gruel. LOL!

Gotta ban those German magazines too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly... which is why, if you are interested in receiving adult content, it is a very simple process for you to opt in to that service. Just like TV.

And would you agree to a special levee on parents in order to pay for all this? Lets say, any parent with a child under fourteen pays double for their internet service so the ISP can make up for their poor parenting skills in not monitoring their child's usage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And arguing that if parents can't work a computer then they are bad parents is silly. Not everyone will know how to use filtering software for smart phones, tablets, Ipads, etc. so this makes a lot of sense.

If you're too stupid to take care of your kid you shouldn't be allowed to have kids.

Either figure it out if you're concerned, or hire someone else to put filter software on. Or drop your kid off at the Childrens Aid Society so they can go to a smarter parent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And would you agree to a special levee on parents in order to pay for all this? Lets say, any parent with a child under fourteen pays double for their internet service so the ISP can make up for their poor parenting skills in not monitoring their child's usage.

If you're too stupid to take care of your kid you shouldn't be allowed to have kids.

Either figure it out if you're concerned, or hire someone else to put filter software on. Or drop your kid off at the Childrens Aid Society so they can go to a smarter parent.

Although I can see you are exaggerating to make a point (I hope!), I found it very ironic that:

1. Supposedly ISP filtering out porn and letting people to call in to unblock their service costs too much, and then you put up ideas that would cost us gazillions of dollars.

2. You are against censorship and do not want the government making decisions regarding internet porn, but you would put the government in charge of deciding who should be allowed to reproduce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I can see you are exaggerating to make a point (I hope!), I found it very ironic that:

1. Supposedly ISP filtering out porn and letting people to call in to unblock their service costs too much, and then you put up ideas that would cost us gazillions of dollars.

Actually what is ironic is the fact that putting on the ISP level will cost you more than buying the needed software yourself and educating yourself some.

2. You are against censorship and do not want the government making decisions regarding internet porn, but you would put the government in charge of deciding who should be allowed to reproduce.

Ironic again. Might not have read the line properly. If you don't want to be a parent then yes give it up to the state. If you want to be a parent, then be a parent and do the filtering yourself. Take responsibility and be a grown up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I lightly follow British domestic politics, namely stuff my younger sister that lives over there brings up when we're chatting, but well looking for well my wife was looking for the latest updates on the William & Kate's little one, found this:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10191855/Crackdown-on-violent-online-porn-planned.html

Always a cheap political stunt. Pornographers can't fight back. In the end nothing happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,736
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Harley oscar
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • haiduk earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Legato went up a rank
      Veteran
    • User earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • NakedHunterBiden earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...