guyser Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 Where did it go? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Peeves Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 Don't know...censored? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Peeves Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 Anyone want to 'splain how a post can simply disappear? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribblet Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 Poltergeists - start it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 (edited) That's weird. I definitely remember reading it. Something about Olivia and Jack living high on the hog on taxpayer's money, I think. Definitely repost it. Edited November 21, 2012 by bcsapper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 That's weird. I definitely remember reading it. Something about Olivia and Jack living high on the hog on taxpayer's money, I think. Definitely repost it. The old bullshit smear about them living in subsidized housing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 The old bullshit smear about them living in subsidized housing? I have no idea. Is that a good reason for it to disappear? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletch 27 Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 LOTS of Links out there http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2011/04/27/ndp-leader-jack-layton-lived-in-subsidized-housing-with-120000-income/ HE was making 120K/A and keeping a needy family from a home..... Its a crying shame how the media bias overlooks this and other incriminating stories about our socialist leaders... Both him and Olivia stealing beds... Shame.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyser Posted November 21, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 LOTS of Links out there http://winteryknight...-120000-income/ HE was making 120K/A and keeping a needy family from a home..... No he wasnt. Its a crying shame how the media bias some people cant research and believe hyperbole overlooks this and other incriminating stories about our socialist leaders... Both him and Olivia stealing beds... Shame.. It is ...wait, you are a shame for not seeking the truth. But thats a righty thing, we know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletch 27 Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 (edited) sorry, re-read,.. thet were making 120K COMBINED! Please, do your homework.... You will aslo find the story of how Olivia Chow backer up her man to avoid charges of being caught red-handed in a rub-n-tug! http://www.torontosu...ouse-former-cop Jack Layton was found laying naked on a bed by Toronto Police at a suspected Chinatown bawdy house in 1996, a retired Toronto police officer told the Toronto Sun. The stunning revelation about the current leader of the New Democratic Party comes days before the federal election at a time when his popularity is soaring. When the policeman and his partner walked into a second-floor room at the Toronto massage parlour, they saw an attractive 5-foot-10 Asian woman who was in her mid-20s and the married, then-Metro councillor, lying on his back in bed. Layton was cautioned by police and released without being charged. Olivia Chow, Layton's wife, denied her husband had done anything wrong in an e-mail statement late Friday night. "Sixteen years ago, my husband went for a massage at a massage clinic that is registered with the City of Toronto," Chow wrote. There are LOTS of registered Massage parlors open at 2:00am up by the airport! Ummm yea... Classy Edited November 21, 2012 by Fletch 27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 Fletch you are a crazy person and these topics already exist on this forum. They should be deleted there are already plenty of threads about how you are wrong on these topics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletch 27 Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 Seems this one was deleted and I was simply helping out... Should we delete all thr truth? Sweep it under the rug? Forget about "accountability"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 Who deleted the original post, and why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletch 27 Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 The ghost of Subsizided housing..... Take your arm... Outstretch it to the fullest.... Point a finger straight out,,, and then bend it to the "left" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 The ghost of Subsizided housing..... Take your arm... Outstretch it to the fullest.... Point a finger straight out,,, and then bend it to the "left" If by Subsizided housing you mean that Jack Paid more then market price so a poor family could also live in the housing then yes it was Subsizided by Jack otherwise all you are showing is how dumb you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 (edited) The old bullshit smear about them living in subsidized housing? This isn't a lie. Olivia and Jack lived in a subsidized housing unit for years and years perhaps decades. A unit that they didn't need to live in even though they weren't subsidized themselves. A truly needy family should've been living in this unit and not to two civil servants who had a very high combined income. Bottom line is that Olivia and Jack were living in a unit that a poor family should be living in. They should be ashamed of themselves!A poor disabled person could've been living there or a poor family who were waiting for housing in a shelter...shame on them! Edited November 21, 2012 by Merlin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 This isn't a lie. Olivia and Jack lived in a subsidized housing unit for years and years perhaps decades. A unit that they didn't need to live in even though they weren't subsidized themselves. A truly needy family should've been living in this unit and not to two civil servants who had a very high combined income. Bottom line is that Olivia and Jack were living in a unit that a poor family should be living in. They should be ashamed of themselves! A poor disabled person could've been living there or a poor family who were waiting for housing in a shelter...shame on them! They lived in a complex that included subsidized suites. They themselves paid market value. That's all there is to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 They lived in a complex that included subsidized suites. They themselves paid market value. That's all there is to it. A poor family should've been living in that unit not millionaire civil servants who are already rich! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 They lived in a complex that included subsidized suites. They themselves paid market value. That's all there is to it. They actually paid a little bit more then market. The idea is that who can afford to pay more do, that way those who can afford to live in such a place are subsidized by the good people like Jack so they can live in good affordable housing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 This isn't a lie. Olivia and Jack lived in a subsidized housing unit for years and years perhaps decades. A unit that they didn't need to live in even though they weren't subsidized themselves. A truly needy family should've been living in this unit and not to two civil servants who had a very high combined income. Bottom line is that Olivia and Jack were living in a unit that a poor family should be living in. They should be ashamed of themselves! A poor disabled person could've been living there or a poor family who were waiting for housing in a shelter...shame on them! Listen I made an old poster Mr. Canada look like a fool when he tired to pull the same crap I suggest you look up that idiots replays to me because I would not want you to go down such a path. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 A poor family should've been living in that unit not millionaire civil servants who are already rich! Do you understand what "market value" means? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyser Posted November 21, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 sorry, re-read,.. thet were making 120K COMBINED! Please, do your homework.... Already have. But I do like watching you embarass yourself. Knock yourself out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyser Posted November 21, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 Should we delete all thr truth? The only truth deleted in this thread is from you.Take punked's offer and do the research. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 They actually paid a little bit more then market. The idea is that who can afford to pay more do, that way those who can afford to live in such a place are subsidized by the good people like Jack so they can live in good affordable housing. I don't understand why you would rather have two very rich politicians living in subsidized housing instead of a needy poor or disabled family. It makes no sense to me and people like me who are disabled/poor. Olivia and Jack could afford to live anywhere they want as they are rich but poor families can only live in subsidized housing, they should not have taken those places up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2012 Report Share Posted November 21, 2012 I don't think it matters a toss where Jack and Olivia lived. Who deleted the damn post? What's the point in posting here if some mod or admin can delete your post on a whim. What arrogance! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts