cybercoma Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 Then why ask? I would think any potential member belonging to any or all of such “inputs” wouldn’t require special attention……..As I said, when I saw the form posted prior, I thought it a joke, not fact. What "special attention" do they get? Quote
cybercoma Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 No, above that, where it asks of union involvement, if one in under/unemployed and 26 or less………………..What is the NDP's hidden agenda with unions? I mean, they've already been caught breaking political financing laws...........What are they up to? Hidden agenda? Do you know anything about the history of the NDP? Quote
Guest Derek L Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 still waiting, hey? Yeah, when you going to answer the question, sans the vulgarity of course……….Does exposing the NDP’s “hidden agenda” pinch a nerve or something? Quote
cybercoma Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 (edited) bush_cheney once again derails a thread about US politics, in the US politics forum, about the Tea Party. Start a thread about the NDP in the appropriate forum if you people want to talk about the NDP. Edited July 9, 2012 by cybercoma Quote
Guest Derek L Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 Because the pre-amble can only be changed at convention by the membership. I can guarantee you that it will probably be changed within the next couple years. You need to look at the NDP in practice, rather than what the out-dated preamble to their constitution says. The document states it’s from June, 2011.…………The NDP has changed their mantra in just over a year? Quote
cybercoma Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 (edited) The document states it’s from June, 2011.…………The NDP has changed their mantra in just over a year? Start another thread in federal politics. Edited July 9, 2012 by cybercoma Quote
Guest Derek L Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 What "special attention" do they get? By asking them to categorize themselves. Quote
Guest Derek L Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 Hidden agenda? Do you know anything about the history of the NDP? I don't care so much about the past, but what they'd do in the future. Quote
Guest Derek L Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 Start another thread in federal politics. Good idea.... Quote
waldo Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 ... and I'm still trying to find confirmation that "the tea party demand[ed]" this bill. why quibble over the word 'demanded'...in even less than 6 degrees - coming soon to your state, or one nearby! => American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC): conservative stealth lobby group involved in developing model legislation to be introduced into U.S. state legislatures... in this particular case, a large-scale assault on public education, working towards state legislation to transform the education system via voucher programs. => Louisiana Republican Governor, Bobby Jindal and ALEC: Gov. Jindal has reshaped Louisiana's public education system based on ALEC's blueprints ///// ALEC and school reform: Louisiana plan mirrors think tank's blueprint => Koch brothers & ALEC: ALEC Exposed: The Koch Connection => Koch brothers: instrumental in founding Tea Party; the Tea Party's wallet! I wasn't - but thanks for your irrelevant input all the same. irrelevant? Hardly! I tied the Louisiana voucher legislation back to the T-Partee in 4 short moves. Like I said, coming soon to your state, or one nearby! Unless your state has already been targeted - yes/no? Quote
waldo Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 What are they up to? still waiting, hey? Why does the CPC collect and gather preference, affiliation, demographic, etc., data within its CIMS database . When/if you do actually end your silly buggar act and respond, make sure to also include another emphatic WOW! Yeah, when you going to answer the question, sans the vulgarity of course……….Does exposing the NDP’s “hidden agenda” pinch a nerve or something? already answered duh! How old are you, really? Since you insist on playing silly buggar, the CPC CIMS database is known to include preferences, affiliations, demographic data, etc.; data that the CPC uses for its analyses before planning election campaign strategies... for issue tracking... etc .. Whatever database the NDP uses... or the Liberals use... or the Green Party uses... or the BLOC uses, I expect they all similarly collect/gather information for the same ends . Does that (also) warrant an emphatic WOW from you? for once... simply shut down your silly buggar act and respond to the same question. Why is such a simple thing so difficult for you? Quote
waldo Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 Why all the confused outrage about this sign up form? It simply gives applicants a chance to sign up for correspondence and information that the NDP sends out to people belonging to these different groups if they choose to check one of the boxes.Jesus.... it is boggling! As mentioned by MLW member, 'cybercoma', we get a typical thread derail from that foreign interloper and the usual suspect laps it right up. Let's see if he actually starts a thread in the right forum; after all, he certainly won't answer the question being put to him within this threads derail. Quote
cybercoma Posted December 4, 2012 Report Posted December 4, 2012 Turns out the Tea Party's proposal was ruled unconstitutional, but the ruling had nothing to do with the religious component. Quote
wyly Posted December 4, 2012 Report Posted December 4, 2012 Ontario, which does have protestant and catholic school boards just said no to Muslim schools. It's time we got rid of this bullshit. Government schools should be secular. I believe most provinces have a vouchers system for private schools, which can be any religion. The only problem there is the province gets lax with ensuring the private school meets the same standards as the public ones. EG Bountiful. With Muslims asserting themselves more and more, I think this issue will become more prominent, and, I hope, lead to a clamping down. I agree but that's not going to happen for another 50yrs when atheists become the dominant majority in canada, until then the catholic school users have to much political clout no government would be re-elected with that much opposition... Quote “Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill
kimmy Posted December 5, 2012 Report Posted December 5, 2012 Turns out the Tea Party's proposal was ruled unconstitutional, but the ruling had nothing to do with the religious component. "Those goll-durn liberals! Tarnation!" -Bobby Jindal. -k Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.