Topaz Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 I don't understand why they would do this but about 1100-1200 agents are losing their jobs at the border, so whose going to look after this, the US?? So I guess we better get ready for more drugs and guns getting into Canada and very long lines, which the truckers won't like. http://ca.news.yahoo.com/border-security-threatened-job-cuts-critics-091152814.html Quote
Smallc Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 I don't understand why they would do this but about 1100-1200 agents are losing their jobs at the border, No they aren't. Quote
cybercoma Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 It's going to be roughly 400 front-line agents. However, by the time people are let go and they bump other positions based on seniority and whatnot, it's tough to say what the impact will be. Quote
Smallc Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 It's going to be roughly 400 front-line agents. However, by the time people are let go and they bump other positions based on seniority and whatnot, it's tough to say what the impact will be. Much of that reduction will be achieved by closing small, underused crossings, I think. Others will come from the reduction in redundant positions. Quote
cybercoma Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 I'll tell you something though. This isn't the news Windsor, ON needs after the last 10 years of de-industrialization. Now those with border services jobs there are in trouble. Quote
Smallc Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 I'll tell you something though. This isn't the news Windsor, ON needs after the last 10 years of de-industrialization. Now those with border services jobs there are in trouble. I wouldn't expect most of the losses to come from Windsor..and things are finally picking up there again. The population is actually growing now. Quote
Tilter Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 (edited) Much of that reduction will be achieved by closing small, underused crossings, I think. Others will come from the reduction in redundant positions. Good, then we won't have to stop at the border in those crossings in the rural Prairie provinces. This will make crossing to & from the US as it was pre 1960, saving us time & waiting frustrations. I wonder if this will affect the crossing on the MonAlta highway? We used to go hunting in that area but never knew whether we were hunting Canadian or American Pronghorns, and I guess the antelope never cared either Edited April 12, 2012 by Tilter Quote
Smallc Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 Good, then we won't have to stop at the border in those crossings in the rural Prairie provinces. This will make crossing to & from the US as it was pre 1960, saving us time & waiting frustrations. I wonder if this will affect the crossing on the MonAlta highway? There won't be any roads left to drive across. Quote
fellowtraveller Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 There won't be any roads left to drive across. It's the Prairies son, we don't need any stinking roads. This isn't the news Windsor, ON needs after the last 10 years of de-industrialization. Now those with border services jobs there are in trouble. The number of civil service jobs should be based on the need for the service, not the persons need for a job. Quote The government should do something.
Tilter Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 (edited) There won't be any roads left to drive across. Out there you don"t need roads. Didn't have many then I don't expect any FWD would have a lot of trouble crossing & recrossing the border now. By the way Topaz--- the border will not be reduced even by a Kilometre--- It'll stay the same till the 2 countries unite. Edited April 12, 2012 by Tilter Quote
Boges Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 (edited) Out there you don"t need roads. Didn't have many then I don't expect any FWD would have a lot of trouble crossing & recrossing the border now. By the way Topaz--- the border will not be reduced even by a Kilometre--- It'll stay the same till the 2 countries unite. Cool maybe it'll be easier to smuggle in duty-free alcohol and tobacco. Edited April 12, 2012 by Boges Quote
Tilter Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 Cool maybe it'll be easier to smuggle in duty-free alcohol and tobacco. Take a look at the Alberta Montana border east of Medicine Hat. There is NOTHING there except the Monalta Highway (& a lot of Antelope) I understand that now the Amis patrol thier borders with UAVs (unarmed I hope ) Quote
Topaz Posted April 12, 2012 Author Report Posted April 12, 2012 No they aren't. Really, you tell that to the people who got slips. BTW, Harper has a greement with the US that the US will be going most of the monitoring, which sounds it leading to the NAU, maybe the border will disappear. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/04/11/mb-cbsa-border-budget-cuts.html Quote
Smallc Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 Really, you tell that to the people who got slips Those aren't for the most part, front line officers. Quote
jbg Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 I don't understand why they would do this but about 1100-1200 agents are losing their jobs at the border, so whose going to look after this, the US?? So I guess we better get ready for more drugs and guns getting into Canada and very long lines, which the truckers won't like. http://ca.news.yahoo.com/border-security-threatened-job-cuts-critics-091152814.html I'd be in favor of a seamless, high-speed border. U.S. and Canada should reserve the right to police each others' airports and seaports, and the Mexican land crossings, in order to make this work. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Guest Manny Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 Reduce services, reduce services. Increase costs, increase bureaucracy. Quote
-TSS- Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 Is the border against Alaska as strictly supervised as the the border against rest of the USA? Probably not. Not much of a chance of illegal immigrants trying to enter Canada from Alaska? Quote
jbg Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 (edited) Is the border against Alaska as strictly supervised as the the border against rest of the USA? Probably not. Not much of a chance of illegal immigrants trying to enter Canada from Alaska? Lots of mammals move around in the Porcupine River area of the Yukon, to and from Alaska (link). Edited April 12, 2012 by jbg Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
punked Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 Is the border against Alaska as strictly supervised as the the border against rest of the USA? Probably not. Not much of a chance of illegal immigrants trying to enter Canada from Alaska? Pretty sure most Illegals in Canada are Americans so..... Quote
Guest Manny Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 I'd be in favor of a seamless, high-speed border. U.S. and Canada should reserve the right to police each others' airports and seaports, and the Mexican land crossings, in order to make this work. Screw your ideas. Not you personally though, just your ideas. Quote
jbg Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 Screw your ideas. Not you personally though, just your ideas. Well why not give an intelligent critique of them? Using profanities is easy. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 12, 2012 Report Posted April 12, 2012 Twice the number of Canadians cross the border than the number of Americans crossing into Canada. And the US has ten times the population. Must be the cheaper gas and cigarettes. 39,254,000 — Trips by Canadians to the U.S. in 2009 20,213,500 — Trips by Americans to Canada in 2010 http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/12/07/f-canada-us-border-by-the-numbers.html Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
cybercoma Posted April 13, 2012 Report Posted April 13, 2012 Is the border against Alaska as strictly supervised as the the border against rest of the USA? Probably not. Not much of a chance of illegal immigrants trying to enter Canada from Alaska? There are key crossing at various places in the country with strict security, but it's literally impossible to police the entire border. Including the Alaskan border it is 8891kms long. Quote
Guest Manny Posted April 13, 2012 Report Posted April 13, 2012 Twice the number of Canadians cross the border than the number of Americans crossing into Canada. And the US has ten times the population. Must be the cheaper gas and cigarettes. 39,254,000 — Trips by Canadians to the U.S. in 2009 20,213,500 — Trips by Americans to Canada in 2010 http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/12/07/f-canada-us-border-by-the-numbers.html I think the president told them to stay in America, not to travel to other lands. Must be that it's too scary in Canada. "And one of the great goals of this Nation's war is to restore public confidence in the airline industry. It's to tell the traveling public: Get on board; do your business around the country; fly and enjoy America's great destination spots; get down to Disney World in Florida; take your families and enjoy life the way we want it to be enjoyed." Quote
Guest Derek L Posted April 13, 2012 Report Posted April 13, 2012 Cool maybe it'll be easier to smuggle in duty-free alcohol and tobacco. And GUNS!!! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.