Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You're right, Manny.

The question on this thread is whether 'bigot' is an insult or not.

Stupid is a relative term, though... and ultimately not measurable. Bigots, racists represent a certain point of view, and we even have a poster defending that point of view on here now.

From your own rule guide

There is a huge difference between disagreeing with a thought or idea and attacking an individual. We encourage lively debate and intelligent critiques of others viewpoints, not tirades against another poster.

Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

That's pretty obviously an insult and nothing else.

You don't think racist is an insult? But what if they ARE a racist, you might say. Well, what if the ARE an asshole?

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

So if someone is being a racist or bigot, they shouldn't be called out on it?

If someone is being an asshole, they shouldn't be called out on it? We know people troll but you're not allowed to call them trolls here either.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

The problem is that you think telling someone they're being racist or bigoted is calling them names. That's not necessarily true.

Given the elastic nature of the terms now, why don't we just accept that it's meant to be insulting? Just like calling someone an asshole.

Because unless someone actually admits they own a white hood, or are a member of some white pride group or other, then you are simply making a judgement of them based on their posts. Which is exactly how I judge some of the posters here as assholes.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Calling someone a bigot and calling someone's rationale bigoted are different.

Yes, generally speaking, that's true. The idea is you attack what was said not the one who said it. Of course, there are ways to attack what was said in as antagonistic and insulting a fashion as possible in order to stay just within the borders of what is acceptable. But then again, if the rules which require dealing with other posters with 'respect' were actually in force even that would not be permissible.

I can operate in either way, openly insulting or respectful, depending on the rules and attitudes. Problem with this place is that what's acceptable is not in line with the actual rules, so it's like driving on the highway. You can stay within the speed limit and never get busted, while everyone else is whizzing past you, or crank it up a bit and risk the occasional speeding ticket.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

so it's like driving on the highway. You can stay within the speed limit and never get busted, while everyone else is whizzing past you, or crank it up a bit and risk the occasional speeding ticket.

:)

A pretty perfect analogy.

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

  • 4 weeks later...
Guest Peeves
Posted (edited)

You could always stop saying racist and bigoted things if you didn't want to be called out on it.

You mean those things you disagree with and that you judge as such regardless there being demonstratively accurate or in some others opinion.

Edited by Peeves
Guest Peeves
Posted

Yes, generally speaking, that's true. The idea is you attack what was said not the one who said it. Of course, there are ways to attack what was said in as antagonistic and insulting a fashion as possible in order to stay just within the borders of what is acceptable. But then again, if the rules which require dealing with other posters with 'respect' were actually in force even that would not be permissible.

I can operate in either way, openly insulting or respectful, depending on the rules and attitudes. Problem with this place is that what's acceptable is not in line with the actual rules, so it's like driving on the highway. You can stay within the speed limit and never get busted, while everyone else is whizzing past you, or crank it up a bit and risk the occasional speeding ticket.

Nicely put.

Posted

Just because there are facts to back something up does not make it a non-racist opinion. Facts can be misleading if you do not understand them.

Feel free to contact me outside the forums. Add "TheNewTeddy" to Twitter, Facebook, or Hotmail to reach me!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Bigotry :

stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own.

That definition applies to many. many posters here part or all of the time, including myself. It is an accurate description at least some of the time and only mildly pejorative IMO.

The government should do something.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

stopstaaron has been banned.

If he returns, please report it and I'll deal with him swiftly.

Thanks

Oh, is their a bounty on his head because I could use the cash. ;)

Edited by Anti-Am
Posted

Bigotry :

That definition applies to many. many posters here part or all of the time, including myself. It is an accurate description at least some of the time and only mildly pejorative IMO.

How could you have stubborn and complete intolerance part of the time?

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...