Shwa Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Occupy Toronto Protesters Must Leave Where does it say that the protesters must leave? The Star is reporting that only the tents must go, but the protesters are welcome to stay and protest (during the day). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted November 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Where does it say that the protesters must leave? The Star is reporting that only the tents must go, but the protesters are welcome to stay and protest (during the day). Sure no one was every saying they have to leave during the day. But they can't camp out anymore. Which was the whole point of this exercise in the first place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shwa Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Sure no one was every saying they have to leave during the day. But they can't camp out anymore. Which was the whole point of this exercise in the first place. Really? You thought the "whole point" of Occupy is about camping out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted November 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Really? You thought the "whole point" of Occupy is about camping out? No the whole point of the opposition to Occupy was to the fact that they were camping out. I don't think I've heard anyone forward the opinion that "Occupiers" have no right to protest. But now that the court has ruled they should have no problem leaving the park overnight and dismantling their tents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 No the whole point of the opposition to Occupy was to the fact that they were camping out. I don't think I've heard anyone forward the opinion that "Occupiers" have no right to protest. But now that the court has ruled they should have no problem leaving the park overnight and dismantling their tents. What they should do is hunt down that piece of shit neo-con Christian Fundamentalist judge and set up camp out front of his house. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted November 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 What they should do is hunt down that piece of shit neo-con Christian Fundamentalist judge and set up camp out front of his house. That type of opinion will get the public on your side real fast! Where in the 54-page ruling did the judge cite Jesus? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 That type of opinion will get the public on your side real fast! :lolPeople like you...we don't want on our side. Where in the 54-page ruling did the judge cite Jesus? You denying the fact that he's a Christian Fundamentalist? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted November 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 (edited) You denying the fact that he's a Christian Fundamentalist? No, I don't know his religion. Do you have any evidence to support the claim that he is a Christian Fundie though? And what does his religion have to do with his ruling? Especially considering An ANGLICAN CHURCH had offered part of their land to these protesters. Edited November 21, 2011 by Boges Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 What they should do is hunt down that piece of shit neo-con Christian Fundamentalist judge and set up camp out front of his house. Rick - see the forum rules with regards to insults. Also, your post indicates to me a degree of religious intolerance as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Rick - see the forum rules with regards to insults. Also, your post indicates to me a degree of religious intolerance as well. Really? That's very mild compared to what I have seen here on MLW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Really? That's very mild compared to what I have seen here on MLW. Calling somebody a 'Piece of ****' is something that would normally result in 'reports' from what I've seen on here. People report milder insults all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted November 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Shock to no one, none of the protesters are dismantling their encampment. I guess they're looking for a fight. Will be interesting to see what happens midnight tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Just another case of the right wing's love of censorship and attempts to stifle those who disagree with them... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted November 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 (edited) Just another case of the right wing's love of censorship and attempts to stifle those who disagree with them... Again any evidence the judge is right wing? Also any evidence that the Police Chief (appointed by David Miller) who will probably have to deal with these zeros, is right wing. Edited November 21, 2011 by Boges Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Again any evidence the judge is right wing? Of course he has no evidence to support his accusation. As though the judge's political leanings mattered. Section 1 of the Charter is pretty clear about the Charter not being a licence for anyone to do whatever they want when they want where they want, including expressing themselves. I often wonder just how many of these professional protesters/perpetual victims even know S.1 exists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPCFTW Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Predictable. Anyone with half a brain could deduce that these limitations to the freedom of assembly existed, no matter how many times lefties spouted off a list of fallacies as a response to any legitimate argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted November 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 (edited) Well Shwa and charter.rights were adamant that Occupiers Charter Rights included being able to camp there. I guess the reason is that they are breaking bylaws not criminal laws. But since the ruling they've been pretty quiet. Edited November 21, 2011 by Boges Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shwa Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Well Shwa and charter.rights were adamant that Occupiers Charter Rights included being able to camp there. I guess the reason is that they are breaking bylaws not criminal laws. No, the right for occupiers to camp there would be tested against the Charter. Or are you intentionally misreading things again? But since the ruling they've been pretty quiet. Is there more to say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted November 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 No, the right for occupiers to camp there would be tested against the Charter. Or are you intentionally misreading things again? Is there more to say? You could go the Rick route and claim a right-wing conspiracy and say the Judge should be hunted down. I'm curious what will happen tonight. Will there be some good ole rioting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueblood Posted November 21, 2011 Report Share Posted November 21, 2011 Peter Schiff is a rock star! All the way to the bank. And I think you are on to something Blueblood: all of the world's problems could be solved by a "crash course in economics." You should patent that. Make sure you give discounts for clients in Africa. Well lots of people around the world say being educated on things makes things better. According to schiff's video, those kids looked frustrated and confused partly because they don't understand how economics works. Had they and most other people understand how economics works, things would run a lot smoother. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted November 22, 2011 Report Share Posted November 22, 2011 Again any evidence the judge is right wing? Also any evidence that the Police Chief (appointed by David Miller) who will probably have to deal with these zeros, is right wing. Yup...http://www.thecomputermechanics.com/forums/showthread.php?19249-Harper-appoints-a-new-Supreme-Court-Judge And with that I'm done here and will begin serving the 30 day suspension of my posting privileges which were supposedly taken from me earlier See you loons, kooks amd right wing wastes of skin in a month's time...some of you..maybe even before that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted November 22, 2011 Report Share Posted November 22, 2011 Well lots of people around the world say being educated on things makes things better. According to schiff's video, those kids looked frustrated and confused partly because they don't understand how economics works. I think it would be very difficult to know the depth of the economic system like Schiff or Celente do. If you dedicate your life to it, you might understand. Had they and most other people understand how economics works, things would run a lot smoother. The thing is, people do know how it works, and that is how many took advantage of it. To get to the situation we are in now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shwa Posted November 22, 2011 Report Share Posted November 22, 2011 Well lots of people around the world say being educated on things makes things better. No shit Sherlock, good clue! However I doubt a "crash course in economics" is going to solve the world's problems especially when plenty of them are caused by peeps highly "educated" in "economics." According to schiff's video, those kids looked frustrated and confused partly because they don't understand how economics works. As opposed to, say, politics? Had they and most other people understand how economics works, things would run a lot smoother. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grogy Posted November 22, 2011 Report Share Posted November 22, 2011 Yup... http://www.thecomputermechanics.com/forums/showthread.php?19249-Harper-appoints-a-new-Supreme-Court-Judge And with that I'm done here and will begin serving the 30 day suspension of my posting privileges which were supposedly taken from me earlier See you loons, kooks amd right wing wastes of skin in a month's time...some of you..maybe even before that Impressive, most impressive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPCFTW Posted November 22, 2011 Report Share Posted November 22, 2011 No shit Sherlock, good clue! However I doubt a "crash course in economics" is going to solve the world's problems especially when plenty of them are caused by peeps highly "educated" in "economics." As opposed to, say, politics? None of the world's problems are caused by economists. First of all, things were a lot worse economically prior to modern economics. People were much poorer and countries believed in invading to obtain scarce resources rather than trading. Secondly, any implementation of the suggestions of economists is bastardized by the influence of politics/nationalism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.