Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You folks obviously remember the recent news about the killing of Awlaki in Yemen by a drone. Anyways, his right-hand man, also an American citizen and a fellow Jihadi propagandist who was obviously involved with these terrorists in several capacities, named Samir Khan, was also killed in the September 30 airstrike that killed Awlaki. So what did the State Department do? Well, they called up his family and apologized for his death and delay in contacting the family, of course.

Also pathetic is how the Samir family issued a statement after the death of their vermin relative, condemning the "assassination", and inferring that his "rights" had been violated. It's telling when we live in a society where the enemy within has no reservations about proudly declaring their complicity in Islamic terrorism. On the other hand, Comedy Central is terrified to release a cartoon that would depict an animated Muhammad. This is how far we've fallen....

My blog - bobinisrael.blogspot.com - I am writing on it, again!

Posted

How far we've fallen - you seem to be referring to the apology.

The fact that the targeted person was a US citizen raised eyebrows, since he received no trial. Whether or not you agree with what happened to him, it does raise some questions. Can the US government simply kill anyone they deem internally to be a threat ?

If Obama's government determined that a rogue Tea Partier's blog postings amounted to sedition, would they then have the right to neutralize this person for security reasons ?

Questions have been raiased.

Posted

...The fact that the targeted person was a US citizen raised eyebrows, since he received no trial. Whether or not you agree with what happened to him, it does raise some questions. Can the US government simply kill anyone they deem internally to be a threat ?

Yes...we have already been over this....Deadly Force was authorized by elected and governing authority. You think Bonnie and Clyde have a case too? How about John Dilinger?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

It seems to be a bit of a grey area in this case. Awlaki certainly got what he deserved. However, as an American citizen, he is protected by certain constiutional rights. However, one could argue that he's renounced his citizenship and/or was certainly guilty of treason, etc.

Posted

It seems to be a bit of a grey area in this case. Awlaki certainly got what he deserved. However, as an American citizen, he is protected by certain constiutional rights. However, one could argue that he's renounced his citizenship and/or was certainly guilty of treason, etc.

He has no constitutional rights outside of America, for starters, and certainly has no rights when he is actively involved in war against America.

My blog - bobinisrael.blogspot.com - I am writing on it, again!

Posted

It does... now. Everybody seems to know how it went down, but that's a new thing, and hence the questions.

Not so new....from WW2 bombings to CIA actions overseas. American citizens were "terminated" with extreme prejudice, especially in espionage cases.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

He has no constitutional rights outside of America, for starters, and certainly has no rights when he is actively involved in war against America.

I don't care if he was in America....aiding and abetting terrorism has its just reward. The only negative is the potential loss of counterterrorism intel collection.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

I don't care if he was in America....aiding and abetting terrorism has its just reward. The only negative is the potential loss of counterterrorism intel collection.

I would love to see the video of the drone strike. Sometimes I just spend like thirty minutes watching videos on YouTube of American and coalition soldiers killing the enemy (helicopter strikes, drone strikes, airplane strikes, live on-the-ground video, etc). Love it, love it, love it.

My blog - bobinisrael.blogspot.com - I am writing on it, again!

Posted

I don't care if he was in America....aiding and abetting terrorism has its just reward. The only negative is the potential loss of counterterrorism intel collection.

Yeah, that damn constitution gets in the way doesn't it? :rolleyes:

Anyways, I'm not arguing that he didn't get what he deserved. But one does have to think about other aspects as well. And even if he was aiding and abetting terrorists. As an American citizen, he's still entitled to his constitutional rights. I know it sucks, but thems the brakes.

Posted

Yeah, that damn constitution gets in the way doesn't it? :rolleyes:

Anyways, I'm not arguing that he didn't get what he deserved. But one does have to think about other aspects as well. And even if he was aiding and abetting terrorists. As an American citizen, he's still entitled to his constitutional rights. I know it sucks, but thems the brakes.

Constitutional rights don't extend to Yemen. Maybe at the embassy, if there is one.

My blog - bobinisrael.blogspot.com - I am writing on it, again!

Posted

I would love to see the video of the drone strike....

I like the ones where the bad guys are meticulously burying a roadside IED at night, get laser designated, and BOOM...they just disappear. Then some guys in a trailer back in Nevada give each other high fives! ;)

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Anyways, I'm not arguing that he didn't get what he deserved. But one does have to think about other aspects as well. And even if he was aiding and abetting terrorists. As an American citizen, he's still entitled to his constitutional rights. I know it sucks, but thems the brakes.

I concur. I lived in France for awhile and the lack of individual rights and due process was noticeable.

You could be stopped and searched at any time, and you had to carry ID at all times. This case opens questions as to what the limits of the government are/should be.

Posted

Anyways, I'm not arguing that he didn't get what he deserved. But one does have to think about other aspects as well. And even if he was aiding and abetting terrorists. As an American citizen, he's still entitled to his constitutional rights. I know it sucks, but thems the brakes.

His survivors can sue Uncle Sam in federal court...maybe even get a few bucks. There is nothing unusual about American law enforcement or military killing perps who are American citizens. Remember Kent State?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

I would love to see the video of the drone strike. Sometimes I just spend like thirty minutes watching videos on YouTube of American and coalition soldiers killing the enemy (helicopter strikes, drone strikes, airplane strikes, live on-the-ground video, etc). Love it, love it, love it.

LOL

OK

troll much?

Science flies you to the moon,

Religion flies you into buildings.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,843
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    beatbot
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Radiorum went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Venandi earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...