Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How is a protest by a mob of students any more an instance of censorship that being escorted out by a burly security guard for not behaving exactly as you are "supposed to" ?

Posted

Errr...define "supposed to".

Not holding up protest signs, not heckling, not refusing to refrain from doing anything that is not according to the plan of the organizers.

Posted (edited)

Not holding up protest signs, not heckling, not refusing to refrain from doing anything that is not according to the plan of the organizers.

Is a lecture hall the appropriate place to riot/protest/shout down a speaker? Personally, if I go to a lecture of any stripe, the last thing I want is some idiot yelling in my ear beside me. There is such a thing as letters to the editor (and this forum for example) to make one's opposite views known. Heck, if the 'protesters' are so upset...(they can) rent a hall and hold their own event.

Edited by DogOnPorch
Posted (edited)
How is a protest by a mob of students any more an instance of censorship that being escorted out by a burly security guard for not behaving exactly as you are "supposed to" ?

Here's a better question: How is a mob shouting so incessantly and loudly that an individual's speech can't be heard an example of the mob respecting that individual's right to free speech?

I imagine your tolerance of tyranny of the majority stops when you find yourself in the minority.

[c/e]

Edited by g_bambino
Posted

Is a lecture hall the appropriate place to riot/protest/shout down a speaker? Personally, if I go to a lecture of any stripe, the last thing I want is some idiot yelling in my ear beside me. There is such a thing as letters to the editor (and this forum for example) to make one's opposite views known. Heck, if the 'protesters' are so upset...(they can) rent a hall and hold their own event.

I never said riot or shout down the speaker. But you have brought up an important question: since Ann Coulter can, in turn, right a letter to the editor or a news column and have it published in Canada, was her right to freedom of speech really infringed on?

Here's a better question: How is a mob shouting so incessantly and loudly that an individual's speech can't be heard an example of the mob respecting that individual's right to free speech?

I imagine your tolerance of tyranny of the majority stops when you find yourself in the minority.

[c/e]

I was not suggesting that the forms of protest that have people removed by security were necessarily shouting down the speaker, though I suppose I can see how it was interpreted that way.

Posted

Ayup. And rednecked Calgary, not only elects a muslem mayor, but has Coulter give a talk at the University of Calgary. How's the old stereotypes doing out there in Canadaland?

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted

Canadaland?

WTF are you talking about? Last I checked, Calgary was a Canadian city. It's surrounded by rednecks, not populated by them.

Posted

WTF are you talking about? Last I checked, Calgary was a Canadian city. It's surrounded by rednecks, not populated by them.

You know, central Canada, the only thing that counts.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted (edited)

I never said riot or shout down the speaker. But you have brought up an important question: since Ann Coulter can, in turn, right a letter to the editor or a news column and have it published in Canada, was her right to freedom of speech really infringed on?

But that was certainly the tactic used in at several speaking engagements...shouting down a speaker. Playing loosey goosey with studet union hall rentals. Making security an issue, etc.

Re: raising a question.

Yes it was, I suppose. Especially in light that a certain university threatened her about appearing re: violation of 'hate speech laws'. Judge, jury, executioner...who knew a university provost had that kind of power? As Penn & Teller so lovingly put it in regards to university honchos: ...and then there's THIS a$$hole.

Edited by DogOnPorch
Posted

You know, central Canada, the only thing that counts.

Yeah, because everyone in Canada is just as narrow and selfish as you are.

Posted
I was not suggesting that the forms of protest that have people removed by security were necessarily shouting down the speaker, though I suppose I can see how it was interpreted that way.

Oh, I see. Your post followed on mine about a loud mob at UofO, so I assumed you were referring to that group in particular. I have a memory of video footage of that incident and, as much as I despise Anne Coulter, I thought it was a shameful display. It's not a lone incident, either.

Reading it again, my response to yours reads a little more snarky than I intended. I apologise.

Posted

Yeah, because everyone in Canada is just as narrow and selfish as you are.

And how was that narrow and selfish?

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted

And how was that narrow and selfish?

You despise the rest of Canada and think of only Alberta, or, alternatively, your definition of the West as important.

Posted

And how was that narrow and selfish?

You despise the rest of Canada and think of only Alberta, or, alternatively, your definition of the West as important.

What does this exchange have to do with free speech or Ishmael Khaldi.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

What does this exchange have to do with free speech or Ishmael Khaldi.

Nothing. I hate on topic discussion. It's so....on topic. :)

Posted

I can roughly understand the fact that university students' ears are so sensitive that about a year ago Ann Coulter couldn't speak at Carlton University. I can understand that Netanyahu's proposed speech at Concordia needed to be stopped by violence and threats of violence.

A Bedouin Arab Israel Muslim by the name of Ishmael Khaldi, the author of A Shepherd's Journey apparently ran into his share of difficulties attempting to speak at Langara College (orignal post had OCR-generated typo) in Vancouver. You see, the problem is that Khaldi doesn't throw rocks, doesn't lie down in front of tanks and doesn't commission family members to blow themselves up in order to create carnage. Instead, e struggled diligently to move beyond his Bedouin village roots to go to an advanced high school, travel to New York City with almost no money and understanding little English, to become a diplomat for Israel. Excerpt from book (obviously not linkable) below:

Quite galling to call a diplomat for a democracy the equivalent of Goebbels.

What a selective memory you have.

No mention of George Galloway who was denied by the GOVERNMENT.

But the speakers who were shouted down by the people are etched in your memory.

Posted
No mention of George Galloway who was denied by the GOVERNMENT.

Every year, thousands of people are denied entry into the country by the Crown. Why is Galloway's rejection so particularly special?

Posted

What a selective memory you have.

No mention of George Galloway who was denied by the GOVERNMENT.

What about the right of the Government to control its borders? And just why was he denied entry?

But the speakers who were shouted down by the people are etched in your memory.

What about "the people" who want to hear what the shouted-down speaker has to say?

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...