Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
'Lost Canadians' leads UN to cast Canada's laws in same light as Vietnam, Zimbabwe

Katie Derosa, THE CANADIAN PRESS

OTTAWA - The failure to close a legislative loophole that has seen seventh-generation Canadians stripped of their citizenship has prompted the United Nations to lump Canada's citizenship record in with countries like Vietnam, Bangladesh and Zimbabwe.

A special report in the UN Refugee Agency's magazine Refugees, titled The Strange Hidden World of the Stateless, singles Canada out for its treatment of the so-called Lost Canadians.

.....

The law also affects border babies and war brides and their children if they failed to register their citizenship before their 24th birthday.

The report was released last month, ahead of the federal government's citizenship week celebration last week.

In a written statement, Immigration Minister Diane Finley said the government sympathizes with those who lost their citizenship "due to outdated laws that have been on the books for many years."

.....

Canada is "now listed in the lowest of the low in countries that have made people stateless," he said.

"It's so appalling that Canada would make a list of the worst of the world," he said. "These are not the countries you want to compare your human rights records to."

....

University of Victoria demographer Barry Edmonston, who has also lost his citizenship in a similar manner, has estimated at least 250,000 Canadians are at risk of losing their citizenship.

http://www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=1078933

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=3b672e98-c5d0-4cde-b523-1fb5de40ef99

"The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre

"There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre

"If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson

Posted

This is typical U.N. rot. There is no way that problems of people who slip between the cracks of immigrations laws rise to the level of the problems of the average citizens of such benighted lands as Vietnam or Zimbabwe. This is the logic that puts Libya on the U.N.'s Human Rights Counsel.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

I would so like Canada to get out of the corrupt and disgusting UN. China and Iran on the Human Rights Council? Come on?

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted (edited)

The UN is an anachronism and the Ottawa Citizen article in the OP demonstrates why.

The better question is how to define the extent of the Canadian State. Can the Canadian federal government prosecute someone who commits an offense in Thailand? Is the Canadian government obliged to pay a pension to a resident of Cuba? Can the Canadian government tax someone working in France? If an American comes to Canada, should the Canadian government pay for health care?

We speak of citizenship but what happens when people can choose their citizenship the way that they choose credit cards. (I have the Amex Black Card!)

And when people can choose their citizenship, what is the State?

Edited by August1991
Posted

Except for those Lebanese-Canadian citizens that were rescued when the shit hit the fan in Lebanon a few years ago.

$94M for Lebanon rescue, but Canadian evacuee grateful

I read a follow-up story about 6 months later which claimed a bunch of the people the Canadian government spent my money to "rescue" went back when things settled down. That did get my goat, to use an non-vulgar expression my dad liked.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted

I read a follow-up story about 6 months later which claimed a bunch of the people the Canadian government spent my money to "rescue" went back when things settled down. That did get my goat, to use an non-vulgar expression my dad liked.

Why so many Canadians love to live in Lebanon? Isn't Canada a place that have better "freedom", "human right", and "democracy"?

"The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre

"There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre

"If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson

Posted

Why so many Canadians love to live in Lebanon? Isn't Canada a place that have better "freedom", "human right", and "democracy"?

I read somewhere that they love to get dual citizenship, live in their homeland, but then if they or a relative get badly ill or injured, they can come here for free health-care. And when they get old, they can come here for the pogy.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted (edited)

I think actually you mean US.

Edited by bjre

"The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre

"There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre

"If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson

Posted

I read somewhere that they love to get dual citizenship, live in their homeland, but then if they or a relative get badly ill or injured, they can come here for free health-care. And when they get old, they can come here for the pogy.

Only after take the dual citizenship, they still choose a place other than the "Freedom", "Democracy" place with "Human rights".

"The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre

"There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre

"If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson

Posted

Only after take the dual citizenship, they still choose a place other than the "Freedom", "Democracy" place with "Human rights".

They've lived under that type of system all their lives. They are just barely cunning enough to be able to scam our system, but feel more comfortable at home, till they need something. It's a total joke, one that costs you and me a lot of money.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted

They've lived under that type of system all their lives. They are just barely cunning enough to be able to scam our system, but feel more comfortable at home, till they need something. It's a total joke, one that costs you and me a lot of money.

So you understand there are many people thinks there are something more important than western style of "human rights", "freedom", and "democracy", and they feel more comfortable without western style of those things. So why need western powers promote their style of system and force others accept their system with bombs?

I definitely don't like to pay for that too.

I think if the politician don't pretend Canada has a better human rights situation, there won't be so many such people with due-citizenship.

"The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre

"There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre

"If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson

Posted

So you understand there are many people thinks there are something more important than western style of "human rights", "freedom", and "democracy", and they feel more comfortable without western style of those things. So why need western powers promote their style of system and force others accept their system with bombs?

I definitely don't like to pay for that too.

I think if the politician don't pretend Canada has a better human rights situation, there won't be so many such people with due-citizenship.

I think the US is screwing up, big time, trying to make Iraq and Afghanistan democracies. It takes a tradition of respecting those values. Same with the so-called Arab spring. No way. Africa is the perfect example.

Stopping, or at least slowing down Al Qeada was the right thing to try, but just look at Karzie et al. What a joke.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted

I think the US is screwing up, big time, trying to make Iraq and Afghanistan democracies. It takes a tradition of respecting those values. Same with the so-called Arab spring. No way. Africa is the perfect example.

That's what they said about Imperial Japan too.

Stopping, or at least slowing down Al Qeada was the right thing to try, but just look at Karzie et al. What a joke.

So why is Canada still "joking" there?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

I think the US is screwing up, big time, trying to make Iraq and Afghanistan democracies. It takes a tradition of respecting those values. Same with the so-called Arab spring. No way. Africa is the perfect example.

Stopping, or at least slowing down Al Qeada was the right thing to try, but just look at Karzie et al. What a joke.

The terrorists was supported and trained by CIA for resist Soviet Union before they change their target to US later.

And the Arab spring is made by CIA with facebook and twitter, it is not people there want.

"The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre

"There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre

"If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson

Posted

The terrorists was supported and trained by CIA for resist Soviet Union before they change their target to US later.

And the Arab spring is made by CIA with facebook and twitter, it is not people there want.

Yep...same as Chinese Nationalists during WW2. They still love America! ;)

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

That's what they said about Imperial Japan too.

So why is Canada still "joking" there?

We made a limited time commitment to help our main ally, the US. It's like having an asshole brother. He may be sort of out of it, but he's your brother so you support him.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted

The story indicates that the Harper government intends to modify/make law to solve this nasty loophole that has taken citizenship away from Canadians, obviously recognizing that it is a problem. On that particular international indicator of 'human rights', Canada is out of whack because of this 'oversight'.

Given the government's response, I'm not sure why posters here seem to be defending the status quo. Would we really deny citizenship to the son of a wwll vet, born where his father was stationed and then living with him in Canada as a child? It seems that the problem is simply that he and thousands of others were not told that they had to register before their 24th birthday. I would think there are solutions here and if Canada has to be embarrassed into action, that's better than continuing to violate the rights of several hundred thousand people who are rightfully Canadians.

It's not like Canada is always magically 'the nicest place in the world': It takes work and vigilance to make sure peoples' rights are upheld, and on this particular issue, Canada screwed up and it needs to be corrected.

Posted (edited)

We made a limited time commitment to help our main ally, the US. It's like having an asshole brother. He may be sort of out of it, but he's your brother so you support him.

Nope....the United States is not your "brother". Canada is a charter member of NATO and the UN, which sanctioned the international action(s) in Afghanistan. The USA's "main ally" is the United Kingdom.

Edited by bush_cheney2004

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Nope....the United States is not your "brother". Canada is a charter member of NATO and the UN, which sanctioned the international action(s) in Afghanistan. The USA's "main ally" is the United Kingdom.

The USA's main ally may be the UK, but our main ally is you guys. We are charter members of NATO. The UN stuff sucks. And I don't think us going into Afghanistan had anything to do with the UN.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted

The USA's main ally may be the UK, but our main ally is you guys. We are charter members of NATO. The UN stuff sucks. And I don't think us going into Afghanistan had anything to do with the UN.

Sorry, but the UN was onboard through Article 51, and Resolutions 1368, 1378, 1386 and 1510 (i.e. ISAF expansion outside Kabul).

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
Except for those Lebanese-Canadian citizens that were rescued when the shit hit the fan in Lebanon a few years ago.
So people abroad are now Canadian citizens. But then, Canadian law extends also to citizens abroad.

The federal tax form now requires a declaration of worldwide income and assets. US citizens must file each year regardless of their residency, wherever they live. I suspect that Canadian citizens will soon have to do the same.

IOW, the State will no longer be a question of geography. It is now a question of status or membership.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...