Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
if it's illegal in the usa not here then it's not illegal, whether it's illegal or illegal in canada will have no effect on smuggling into the the us.
Not true. A legal industry here would greatly increase the amount of smuggling because it would suddenly become hugely profitable. For that reason legalization in Canada would increase the power of organized crime. People who think otherwise are being naive.
  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Not true. A legal industry here would greatly increase the amount of smuggling because it would suddenly become hugely profitable. For that reason legalization in Canada would increase the power of organized crime. People who think otherwise are being naive.

That's why I don't want it to become an industry. Just legal to grow , possess and smoke in personal quantities. It's legal in Spain for personal use yet it isn't an industry really, other then buying and selling of different seed strains. I think Canada is ready to become adults and decide for themselves.

"You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley

Canadian Immigration Reform Blog

Posted

Not true. A legal industry here would greatly increase the amount of smuggling because it would suddenly become hugely profitable. For that reason legalization in Canada would increase the power of organized crime. People who think otherwise are being naive.

what an absurd leap of logic, you are naive...pot smuggling into the the US is already popular because it is HUGELY profitable right now despite sever prison sentences in the US...making it legal to produce is not going to turn law abiding farmers into criminal smugglers that opportunity is already there should they wish to...criminals are not deterred by laws and punishment, law abiding citizens are, a law abiding alberta farmer is not suddenly going to become the center of canadian drug smuggling cartel...

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

Posted
what an absurd leap of logic, you are naive...pot smuggling into the the US is already popular because it is HUGELY profitable right now despite sever prison sentences in the US.
And it would become even more popular if they could grow the stuff in Canada with no fear of it being confiscated by the authorities because it is for domestic consumption (wink, wink, nudge, nudge). Legalization will make the organized crime problem worse in Canada whether you want to admit or not.
Posted

Are you guys kidding? Its bad enough that drivers have to worry about drunk drivers, now you want them to drive high?? Medical marijuana is one thing but just putting it out there, no way. Even the Tory party is against this being legal.

Posted (edited)

And it would become even more popular if they could grow the stuff in Canada with no fear of it being confiscated by the authorities because it is for domestic consumption (wink, wink, nudge, nudge). Legalization will make the organized crime problem worse in Canada whether you want to admit or not.

Just the opposite was seen in Portugal. Google it. Just one link here but there are lots.

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html

The link doesn't work. I double checked it. Don't know what the problem is.

Edited by RNG

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted (edited)
Just the opposite was seen in Portugal.
Portugal is not make the production or distribution of drugs legal. It simply decriminalized possession. If you get caught possessing drugs you are expected to seek treatment - something the pots heads pushing legalization would likely oppose since they think marijuana is 'harmless'. Edited by TimG
Posted

Portugal is not make the production or distribution of drugs legal. It simply decriminalized possession. If you get caught possessing drugs you are expected to seek treatment - something the pots heads pushing legalization would likely oppose since they think marijuana is 'harmless'.

You are offered treatment, which you are free to refuse without penalty.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted
You are offered treatment, which you are free to refuse without penalty.
You still have to go through the process with each arrest. That means you keep possession a secret. Drugs are still controlled substances that cannot be legally produced or sold.

I actually favour Portugal's approach if for no reason but to reduce the workload of police. But lets not pretend they have legalized anything.

Posted

You still have to go through the process with each arrest. That means you keep possession a secret. Drugs are still controlled substances that cannot be legally produced or sold.

I actually favour Portugal's approach if for no reason but to reduce the workload of police. But lets not pretend they have legalized anything.

They have legalized possession for use by yourself. I have never been sure but have always thought that "decriminalizing" is what the Dutch did. The laws are still on the books, but the government instructed the police to not enforce them. That isn't the case in Portugal.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted
That isn't the case in Portugal.
The are no criminal penalties but you still have to explain yourself if you are caught with drugs and your stash will be conficated by the authorities. There is a big difference between legalization of drugs (i.e. make it like alcohol) and decriminalization (which is what Portugal did).
Posted

The are no criminal penalties but you still have to explain yourself if you are caught with drugs and your stash will be conficated by the authorities. There is a big difference between legalization of drugs (i.e. make it like alcohol) and decriminalization (which is what Portugal did).

But apparently you explain yourself to a panel that consists of a psychologist, a doctor and a social worker, not a court.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted
But apparently you explain yourself to a panel that consists of a psychologist, a doctor and a social worker, not a court.
Yes. I don't have to explain myself to a social worker if I am caught drunk with a can of beer. Why can't you see that even in your Portugal example drugs are controlled substance that cannot be sold legally. People in this thread seem to think that we should be not only decriminalizing but make the production and sale of drugs legal. I can support the former but not the latter.
Posted

Are you guys kidding? Its bad enough that drivers have to worry about drunk drivers, now you want them to drive high?? Medical marijuana is one thing but just putting it out there, no way. Even the Tory party is against this being legal.

IS this a problem in other countries that have some form of legalization? People who would smoke it in Canada while legal are the same people who smoke and drive now with it being illegal. Are you trying to say that more people would use cannabis if it were legal?

"You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley

Canadian Immigration Reform Blog

Posted

Yes. I don't have to explain myself to a social worker if I am caught drunk with a can of beer. Why can't you see that even in your Portugal example drugs are controlled substance that cannot be sold legally. People in this thread seem to think that we should be not only decriminalizing but make the production and sale of drugs legal. I can support the former but not the latter.

I would agree for all drugs except weed. Legalize the growing and control the selling, just like alcohol. Make lots of tax money and make many criminals unemployed.

And I have been told by people whom I trust that studies have shown that overall drug use, including weed has actually decreased in Portugal since they "made the change".

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted
I would agree for all drugs except weed. Legalize the growing and control the selling, just like alcohol. Make lots of tax money and make many criminals unemployed.
My response that: it is in our economic interest to keep the border with the US as free as possible. Therefore, forget about legalizing dope until the US does.
Posted

My response that: it is in our economic interest to keep the border with the US as free as possible. Therefore, forget about legalizing dope until the US does.

I seriously question whether the US would react in any way. There is so much BC weed going into Washington and Idaho now I don't think it would make a difference.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted (edited)
I seriously question whether the US would react in any way. There is so much BC weed going into Washington and Idaho now I don't think it would make a difference.
They would react because the volume would increase since the organized gangs would be making a lot more money since the cost of goods will have dropped dramatically. Even if there was some doubt over the US reaction: why risk it? Legalizing dope would not reduce crime in Canada because of smuggling so there is little benefit to us. Edited by TimG
Posted (edited)

DELETED

I tried to post the link again. It doesn't work on this forum. Google "drug legalization in portugal" and follow the first link.

Edited by RNG

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted
I tried to post the link again. It doesn't work on this forum. Google "drug legalization in portugal" and follow the first link.
As I said. Decriminalization is likely a good idea. That is what Portugal did. It is no argument for legalization of the production and distribution of dope.
Posted

As I said. Decriminalization is likely a good idea. That is what Portugal did. It is no argument for legalization of the production and distribution of dope.

I guess we have both expressed our views and will agree to disagree.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted (edited)

But apparently you explain yourself to a panel that consists of a psychologist, a doctor and a social worker, not a court.

What happens if you simply ignore them or tell them to get off your back and mind their own damn business?

Edited by eyeball

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,914
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    MDP
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • MDP went up a rank
      Rookie
    • MDP earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • derek848 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • MDP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...