Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Read the article I linked to a few posts back. He never worked for the Conservatives.

You'll have to excuse us if we don't take Ezra Levant's words at face value.

Edited by Smallc
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

But you accept Andrew Potter's? Really?

Not necessarily, but I trust him more than Canada's equivalent to Glenn Beck.

Posted

You think Levant is a mormon?

I think he's a wing nut who would twist the truth and way he had to in order to get the result he wanted.

Posted

I think he's a wing nut who would twist the truth and way he had to in order to get the result he wanted.

You think. Since when does "you think" be considered in a debate?

Besides, that's quite a slanderous claim you've made. Back it up.

Posted

You think. Since when does "you think" be considered in a debate?

:lol: Yes, I'll be lectured by you on how to have a debate.

Besides, that's quite a slanderous claim you've made. Back it up.

I don't have to....or do you now know the meaning of "I think"? You seemed to be a self described expert on it just seconds ago.

Posted (edited)

But you accept Andrew Potter's? Really?

I'd accept Andrew Potter's over anything you can provide.

You're an admitted paying shill for the Conservative party...

Edited by Jack Weber

The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

Posted

Read the article I linked to a few posts back. He never worked for the Conservatives.

He wasn't a staffer for a Nova Scotia Progressive Conservative leadership candidate in 2005?

And that's not "working for the Conservatives"?

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted

I'd accept Andrew Potter's over anything you can provide.

You're admitted paying shill for the Conservative party...

Paying shill? What the hell does that even mean? I support the party out of MY pocket, and that somehow makes me beholden to THEM? You need to adjust your tinfoil hat.

The fact remains, Andrew Potter is lying. Loewen never worked for the federal Conservatives, and he most certainly never worked for Stephen Harper. Only Potter claims he did. His own source, Tom Flanagan, says Potter is not telling the truth:

“Peter didn’t work for me
“The story has gotten a little distorted, I think. He was never on my payroll.
He was not a paid employee of the national campaign in 2004.

The only thing he ever did, was the very thing that both Lilly and Levant have been perfectly open about: Loewen and Flanagan exchanged some data by email after the election in 2004

http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/cbc/andrewpotterdoesntknowsquat/

Posted

Paying shill? What the hell does that even mean? I support the party out of MY pocket, and that somehow makes me beholden to THEM? You need to adjust your tinfoil hat.

Uh huh...

You give them your money,hence paying them...

And let's face it...

You're a Con shill...

Hence "Paying Shill"...

The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

Posted

Uh huh...

You give them your money,hence paying them...

And let's face it...

You're a Con shill...

Hence "Paying Shill"...

You don't even know what a shill is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill

A shill or plant is a person who helps another person or organization to sell goods or services without disclosing that he or she has a close relationship with the seller.

If I'm paying THEM, and I'm telling you about it, that very specifically makes me NOT a shill.

Posted

You don't even know what a shill is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill

If I'm paying THEM, and I'm telling you about it, that very specifically makes me NOT a shill.

So now it's down to semantics,like it always is with you folks...

"It's not a coalition!!!...It's a "co-opaltion"..."

:lol:

The point is that you have zero objective credibility...

The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

Posted

So now it's down to semantics,like it always is with you folks...

"It's not a coalition!!!...It's a "co-opaltion"..."

:lol:

The point is that you have zero objective credibility...

Methinks thou dost project too much.

Posted (edited)

And he's calling you on yours.

Hey...

The Professor,Captain (Wannabe) America has showed up...

Could you point out my "unobjectiveness" for everyone?

As always,thanks for playing Professor...

Edited by Jack Weber

The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

Posted

Some people are confused by the concept of objectivity and believe that you lose it when you form an opinion.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,916
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Раймо
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Раймо earned a badge
      First Post
    • Раймо earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • MDP went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • MDP earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • MDP went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...