Jump to content

Federal Election Polls


Recommended Posts

They do their own polling. By all accounts internal polling is supposed to be much more accurate.

Wow. Why though?

Do you have any more details? Like n=? How often? That sort of stuff. It seems to me that it'd be duplicate effort since phone/IVR/online polls are already conducted. Seems like a waste of party funds. I just can't seem to figure out "why" they do such a thing

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Public polling was invented in an era when it might have meant something but it no longer does.....

The majority of Canadians have call-display on their telephones, and they don't answer telemarketers and that includes pollsters... so how do you possibly get a proper "scientific representation"?

The famous Gallup organization in the USA has given up and is not polling for the Presidential election because they recongnize now that polling is impossible.

So the only "scientific" polls that can be done are if you have some captive audience that is more-or-less guaranteed to reply. Other than a list of your own supporters, that is going to be pretty hard to come by in the general public.

...

Edited by Icebound
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. Why though?

Do you have any more details? Like n=? How often? That sort of stuff. It seems to me that it'd be duplicate effort since phone/IVR/online polls are already conducted. Seems like a waste of party funds. I just can't seem to figure out "why" they do such a thing

Thanks!

The parties have detailed databases of voters and their intentions, and this can target polling much more scientist. They can ask questions like "How many Tory voters in Riding X intend to view fit another party?" and since they can produce a list of Tory supporters with phone numbers they can answer these questions.

Public pollsters cannot target votes in this way, and really the intent of the two kinds of polls is different. At this stage, internal polling is about the parties figuring out where they need to put resources, build targeted messages, and even some times to pull back because there's no chance of winning in that riding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The majority of Canadians have call-display on their telephones, and they don't answer telemarketers and that includes pollsters... so how do you possibly get a proper "scientific representation"?

that had been a prevailing understanding... as calling cell-phones was restricted within automated polling. When done properly, pollsters rely upon manual dialing to include a proportionate cell-phone base... it is more expensive; however, that cost has come down in terms of more efficient practices and methodology changes - suggested to cost ~25% more (cell phone versus landline).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't get it. Liberals are far ahead, and any poll that disagrees with that means there's an error.

People are just remembering previous election polling. Go back and look a the polls leading up to the past several elections. Look at the numbers attributed to the CPC compared to what they really got. CPC consistently got higher numbers than most of the polls will have you believe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_in_the_Canadian_federal_election,_2011

I think things are even worse now though, in that the polls are all over the map. Any of the three main parties could be anywhere. This may be the last election where someone mentions "polling" without laughing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The parties have detailed databases of voters and their intentions, and this can target polling much more scientist. They can ask questions like "How many Tory voters in Riding X intend to view fit another party?" and since they can produce a list of Tory supporters with phone numbers they can answer these questions.

Public pollsters cannot target votes in this way, and really the intent of the two kinds of polls is different. At this stage, internal polling is about the parties figuring out where they need to put resources, build targeted messages, and even some times to pull back because there's no chance of winning in that riding.

Thanks (to you and Icebound). This is very interesting. It makes sense to me that they can product a list of supporters that support them, but are you perhaps implying they have access to voters who are not a supporter of their party?

The second paragraph definitely makes sense to me wrt allocation of resources

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks (to you and Icebound). This is very interesting. It makes sense to me that they can product a list of supporters that support them, but are you perhaps implying they have access to voters who are not a supporter of their party?

The second paragraph definitely makes sense to me wrt allocation of resources

Yes, they gather data on voters who do not vote for their party. That's how the Tories' CIMS database was used to misdirect Liberal voters in 2011. It is also the reason I answer no question on voter intentions from political parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, they gather data on voters who do not vote for their party. That's how the Tories' CIMS database was used to misdirect Liberal voters in 2011. It is also the reason I answer no question on voter intentions from political parties.

But how would they have access to information regarding voters who don't vote for their party, assuming that they know who they will be voting for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But how would they have access to information regarding voters who don't vote for their party, assuming that they know who they will be voting for?

They ask. I've received calls from the Conservatives, Tories, NDP and Greens asking how I intend to vote. They do this early on and then can use it to produce sample groups of potential supporters and potential voters for other parties. That is how they can produce much better riding level predictions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't that the point of an IBB? To learn from each other? Or are we committing to left leaning supporters crapping on right leaning supporters and vice versa?

that's the point of an IBB? Who knew! :lol: It was an observation... I sure don't notice you doing much learnin' others - your presumed information flow works both ways!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and they also track donors to other parties, feeding that into their databases. I've heard from a friend of mine who worked on the Tory camapaign in 2008 that CIMS can produce extremely sophisticated queries on voter intentions. I would assume the Liberals and NDP have the same capabilities. Such data analysis is supposedly even more sophisticated in US elections; the Democrats built an incredible database for the 2008 elections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went door knocking with the Manitoba NDP for a work experience project once when I was younger. Each house we came to, he'd ask me their name and how they were going to vote before we got there. They knew how almost everyone was voting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went door knocking with the Manitoba NDP for a work experience project once when I was younger. Each house we came to, he'd ask me their name and how they were going to vote before we got there. They knew how almost everyone was voting.

Wait, this is a confusing statement. Who is he?, and how did they know? And if they did, why go door to door?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...