Palin Event Cancelled for Safety Reasons

WIP · February 7, 2011

Obviously there's a double standard here, the Arizona incident was shocking and terrible, but if an event for Palin is cancelled for “Due to an onslaught of personal attacks against Governor Palin and others associated with her appearance" it's not a problem. Sure does give a whole new meaning to PDR

Forgive me for feeling little sympathy for the woman who puts gunsight targets on a map of Democratic Congressional Districts, yacks about 2nd amendment rights, and advises followers to "don't retreat, RELOAD"...in all caps. Up till now, I've considered the rightwing bullshit about new black panthers and threats from liberals to be the equivalent to bullies complaining about victims bleeding on their shoes; but at some point, there is going to be violent reactions from the left in response to the violent rightwing rhetoric that permeates all forms of media. If the story is legit, Sarah can consider it blowback as far as I'm concerned, for not even having the decency to apologize if her messages could have been misused by some violent psycho; but no! She played the victim, and made it all about her and how offended she was that anyone would consider her even partly responsible for the shooting and other acts of violence lately.

There are a lot of angry, frustrated people on the real left in the U.S., and they are pissed off as hell by being let down completely by Obama, 99% of Democrats, and seeing government policy continue to be engineered by the richest and most powerful against the interests of the majority. At some point there IS going to be a real violent reaction from the mostly pacifist left, just like there was to a limited extent back in the 60's. But now, as then, most of the guns, and most of the aggression is on the side of the far right that is currently waiting for a fascist leader to rally behind.

scribblet · February 7, 2011

It's changed to a whole new level of derangement. It's in the stratosphere now. Apparently she has to risk her life now, or she's not a credible politician or something.

This kind of derangement is off the charts, never before seen in the history of politics. Sounds like we have some Jared Lee Loughners in this forum.

Shady is right, some don't see that they seem to be saying it's okay for Palin to be threatened but not Democrat. Also the derangement seems to be eclipsing even that of BDS :lol: Left wing heads explode at the mere mention of her name, one commentator said he’s never in his life seen someone receive such vicious media coverage as Palin, along with the left's continued attempts at character assassination. Whether or not you like her politics, it's the climate of hate and threats which caused the event to be cancelled.

the Denver Post said that the planned event as ”both as an awards banquet and a fundraiser, providing financial resources to military families in need and raising money for a grief camp for children who have lost loved ones in combat.”

Too bad an event set up to help families and children had to be sacrificed on the altar of liberal hate.

For those who seem to be unable to read, Palin never threatened anyone, Loughner's problems started before Palin

Edited February 7, 2011 by scribblet

Shady · February 7, 2011

Forgive me for feeling little sympathy for the woman who puts gunsight targets on a map of Democratic Congressional Districts, yacks about 2nd amendment rights, and advises followers to "don't retreat, RELOAD"...in all caps.

You mean like Democrats put targets on Republican Senate seats in 2004? Just like that? And you mean like when Obama said "they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." You mean like that? When did the rules change for her as oppose to other politicians? :rolleyes:

Oh right, I forgot. Palin Derangement Syndrome. That's why. :lol:

Shady · February 7, 2011

DNC map from the 2004 election cycle.

Map

You'll notice the bullseye targets, as well as a "behind enemy lines" description at the bottom of the page.

scribblet · February 7, 2011

Right, but I'm sure there will be a far left democrat just waiting to tell us, they are not targets doncha know LOL

Shakeyhands · February 7, 2011

DNC map from the 2004 election cycle.

Map

You'll notice the bullseye targets, as well as a "behind enemy lines" description at the bottom of the page.

Not to be all about semantics but I can't help notice that the targets on that map are like a bulls eye target, somewhat different than the crosshairs of a scoped weapon no?

guyser · February 7, 2011

Forgive me for feeling little sympathy for the woman who puts gunsight targets on a map of Democratic Congressional Districts, yacks about 2nd amendment rights, and advises followers to "don't retreat, RELOAD"...in all caps.

No need for sympathy. She doesnt need it nor want it.

So, she yaps about 2nd amendment rights. Who doesnt down there and why any concern, it is legal you know.

Up till now, I've considered the rightwing bullshit about new black panthers and threats from liberals to be the equivalent to bullies complaining about victims bleeding on their shoes; but at some point, there is going to be violent reactions from the left in response to the violent rightwing rhetoric that permeates all forms of media.

So one side can yak up a storm, and one side can shoot/stab/insertviolencetypehere and you are all cool with that? Should nt be.

Sticks and stones can break my bones......

If the story is legit, Sarah can consider it blowback as far as I'm concerned, for not even having the decency to apologize if her messages could have been misused by some violent psycho; but no! She played the victim, and made it all about her and how offended she was that anyone would consider her even partly responsible for the shooting and other acts of violence lately.

She didnt play the victim, she was one. Sure, she played it up, smart on her (for once in her life)

There are a lot of angry, frustrated people on the real left in the U.S., and they are pissed off as hell by being let down completely by Obama, 99% of Democrats, and seeing government policy continue to be engineered by the richest and most powerful against the interests of the majority. At some point there IS going to be a real violent reaction from the mostly pacifist left, just like there was to a limited extent back in the 60's. But now, as then, most of the guns, and most of the aggression is on the side of the far right that is currently waiting for a fascist leader to rally behind.

The world wont end anytime soon. Relax.

Edited February 7, 2011 by guyser

BubberMiley · February 7, 2011

It's hilarious that the two people on this board most consumed with overwhelming hatred for Obama get all tied in knots over any criticism of their beloved Sarah. :lol:

punked · February 7, 2011

I know when I look through the scope of gun to aim at something there is no archery target in those sites. Maybe Shady's gun is different but I don't think it is.

BTW the Dems have not one name attached to their map, while Sarah wrote herself a hit list.

Edited February 7, 2011 by punked

scribblet · February 7, 2011

Told ya - it's different doncha know LOL

BubberMiley · February 7, 2011

Told ya - it's different doncha know LOL

Finally an unbiased observation on your part. I'm impressed.

punked · February 8, 2011

By the way Shady has it wrong it wasn't a DNC map it was a DLC map. Although I don't expect Shady the Lair to know any better.

Bitsy · February 8, 2011

There is so much wrong about this, I don’t know where to begin.

First, let us look at the organization.

http://www.denverpost.com/dontmiss/ci_17312383

Next, why did the event have to be” sacrificed on the altar of liberal hate”? There are many other speakers available for such a good and noble cause; after all, the event is not scheduled until May. I am sure there are many who would welcome the chance to help families with loved ones in the military.

And this, “but cites last month’s tragic shootings in Tucson along with an “increase in negative rhetoric” that raises concerns for Palin’s safety.” However, if you listened to the right wing after the events in Tucson, “negative rhetoric” did not contribute to the violence of that day.

Lastly, May 2 is also the date of a NBC/Politico 2012 Republican presidential candidates debate, to be held at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in California.

At last, the crux of the matter…the likely scenario is that little item was not on her calendar when she accepted the invitation to speak in Colorado but playing the victim role comes easier to Palin than admitting a scheduling conflict…and especially since she has so those who buy into her role as the victim.

Wilber · February 8, 2011

And this, “but cites last month’s tragic shootings in Tucson along with an “increase in negative rhetoric” that raises concerns for Palin’s safety.” However, if you listened to the right wing after the events in Tucson, “negative rhetoric” did not contribute to the violence of that day.

Good point. Ms Palin wants it both ways.

BubberMiley · February 8, 2011

It gives warm, self-righteous feelings to always be the victim though. :lol:

scribblet · February 8, 2011

Does it make you feel warm and righteous and fuzzy all over because Palin is threatened?

BubberMiley · February 8, 2011

Does it make you feel warm and righteous and fuzzy all over because Palin is threatened?

Not at all. I like Sarah Palin. She was great on Dancing with the Stars.

punked · February 8, 2011

Does it make you feel warm and righteous and fuzzy all over because Palin is threatened?

Did you read the story it stats in the story she wasn't threatened at all. There you go writing your own news.

scribblet · February 8, 2011

You are right, but there were concerns for her safety and the safety of others, obviously they read enough to be worried, but I guess that doesn't count, better someone gets of a good shot at her before it matters.

BubberMiley · February 8, 2011

You are right, but there were concerns for her safety and the safety of others, obviously they read enough to be worried, but I guess that doesn't count, better someone gets of a good shot at her before it matters.

Your hypocrisy is really starting to stink. :lol:

punked · February 8, 2011

But I thought she didn't retreat she reloaded?

Bitsy · February 8, 2011

Palin’s cancellation because of safety concerns at an event in Colorado was enough to send a Denver Post journalist searching for “the altar of liberal hate” that was denying help to military families and children.

Read more: Littwin: So hateful, even Sarah Palin won't come here? - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/commented/ci_17321890?source=commented-#ixzz1DN6QEyMk

Shakeyhands · February 8, 2011

More from the Post... Perhaps the Palin lovers here can let us all in on the threats?

Palin is ascareeeeed

scribblet · February 8, 2011

Your hypocrisy is really starting to stink.

Your fabrications are starting to stink - I take that back - your fabrications still stink. Keep your uninformed personal attacks to yourself.

Shady · February 8, 2011

Right, but I'm sure there will be a far left democrat just waiting to tell us, they are not targets doncha know LOL

Not to be all about semantics but I can't help notice that the targets on that map are like a bulls eye target, somewhat different than the crosshairs of a scoped weapon no?

LOL! Bingo! Doncha know that bulleyes with "behind enemy lines" are different? :rolleyes:

It's hilarious that the two people on this board most consumed with overwhelming hatred for Obama get all tied in knots over any criticism of their beloved Sarah.

Complete nonsense. As I stated in my original post. One can criticize Palin legitimately for many things. However, cancelling an appearance because of security concerns isn't one of them. Stop the derangement already.