Jump to content

Raising the US debt ceiling


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Only if you count private dollars with government dollars.

I know, I know, you'd prefer that private money be confiscated first by the government, and then sifted through a massive bureaucracy. I get it.

GH's assertion of there being "no money for anything else" is completely assinine. The current budget is 4 trillion dollars. Of which, only 600 billion is for defense. How can anyone with half a brain comment on a lack of money for anything else. Unbelievable. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, I know, you'd prefer that private money be confiscated first by the government, and then sifted through a massive bureaucracy. I get it.

GH's assertion of there being "no money for anything else" is completely assinine. The current budget is 4 trillion dollars. Of which, only 600 billion is for defense. How can anyone with half a brain comment on a lack of money for anything else. Unbelievable. :rolleyes:

Just pointing out the US is the richest nation in the world until you ask someone to pay taxes then no one has any money "and will move out of the country if you make them pay 1-2% more." or so you claim.

BTW I like the 600 billion dollar number you pulled right out your butt it is always nice to see you make up numbers Shady. I also like how you inflated a 3.8 trillion dollar budget to a 4 trillion dollar one. Look everyone I found how save 200 billion right there.

Edited by punked
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, I know, you'd prefer that private money be confiscated first by the government, and then sifted through a massive bureaucracy. I get it.

GH's assertion of there being "no money for anything else" is completely assinine. The current budget is 4 trillion dollars. Of which, only 600 billion is for defense. How can anyone with half a brain comment on a lack of money for anything else. Unbelievable. :rolleyes:

What if the House sends a budget bill to the President and he vetoes it. What then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grover Norquist just said he likes the idea Shady is pretending the Republicans wont use. That is just let Obama raise the ceiling with out getting anything. Guess what? The Republicans are falling in line I wonder when Shady starts defending it. Looks to me like he hasn't found the talking points. I bet he will though.

Shady I could give you talking points right now. "It isn't the Republicans who control the house who are raising the ceiling it is the minority Democrats and the devil who are doing it." got it Shady? Now just repeat it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely Shady isn't suggesting that the Republicans want to create a worldwide crisis causing a devalued American dollar, increased interest rates and further devastation to the people of the United States.

Increased interest rates would be welcomed by many, including seniors with savings instruments. The American dollar is already being devalued...by design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Increased interest rates would be welcomed by many, including seniors with savings instruments. The American dollar is already being devalued...by design.

Perhaps some of the more affluent seniors. However many more seniors aren't in this category and have little or no savings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once interest rises credit will tighten. Small businesses relying on credit to keep their businesses from going under will collapse putting more people out of work. This will have a multiplier effect and will further exacerbate an already fragile situation.

Edited by pinko
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once interest rises credit will tighten. Small businesses relying on credit to keep their businesses from going under will collapse putting more people out of work. This will have a multiplier effect and will further exacerbate an already fragile situation.

Tightening of credit markets is what caused the great depression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama Warns of Debt Stalemate

President Obama will not promise that Social Security checks will go out on August 3 unless a deficit-reduction deal is struck. "I cannot guarantee that those checks go out… There may simply not be enough money in the coffers to do it," he told Scott Pelley of CBS News on Tuesday. "This is not just a matter of Social Security checks," he explained. These are veterans' checks, these are folks on disability and their checks. There are about 70 million checks that go out." Meanwhile, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said that he does not think a significant reduction deal can be reached as long as Obama is in power. He said, "After years of discussions and months of negotiations, I have little question that as long as this president is in the Oval Office, a real solution is probably unattainable."

Read it at CBS News

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long can the US keep printing money they don't have. The Republicans don't want to have taxes raised because the the high unemployment but how about raising taxes on the very rich like the millionaires and billionaires who can stand to pay, for the sake of the country. Isn't that better than letting the whole country go down the tubes and the rest of the world with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

July 12, 2011 at 5:01 PM EDT

McConnell Presents Plan to Put Debt Limit Hike Burden on Obama By: Quinn Bowman

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., laid out a surprise alternative in the debt limit negotiations Tuesday that would essentially leave it up to President Obama to raise the debt ceiling and allow Republicans to vote against the increase.

In a move intended to assure financial markets that the United States will not default on its debt, McConnell proposed that Congress pass a law that would authorize President Obama to increase the debt limit. McConnell said he was increasingly pessimistic about reaching any deal with the White House on a way to cut spending in exchange for raising the debt limit.

Here are the main provisions of McConnell's proposal:

-President Obama would make three separate requests to increase the debt limit. Once now, once in the fall and once in summer 2012. The total would be the $2.5 trillion needed to increase the debt limit until the end of President Obama's first term. The first request would be for $700 billion, followed by two requests of $900 billion.

-Each request would have to be accompanied by spending reduction requests greater than the amount of the debt limit increase, but these would not be binding on Congress.

-Each request would also be subject to a "resolution of disapproval," which President Obama would presumably veto. McConnell said he thinks both chambers would pass resolution. A veto can only be overridden by two-thirds of both chambers of Congress.

McConnell said this option is not his first choice for how to deal with the debt limit debate.

"I had hoped all year long that the opportunities presented by his request of us to raise the debt ceiling would generate a bipartisan agreement that would begin to get our house in order by reducing spending. That may still happen, I hope it will. But we aren't going to send a signal to the markets and the American people that default is an option," McConnell said.

One Republican presidential hopeful immediately rejected McConnell's approach:

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2011/07/mcconnell-presents-plan-to- put-debt-limit-hike-burden-on-obama.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's pretty slimey of Obama to threathen social security recipients. Social security funds should be seperate from the rest of the budget, see as though only payroll taxes fund it. There's no reason those SS cheques shouldn't go out. Unless he just enjoys being a dick, and playing more politics with people's lives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McConnell is attempting this to save face for he and his party. Read the bipartisanpolicy.org analysis.

That's because he's said as long as Obama's president, there won't be a substantial deal. I tend to agree. Obama's too addicted to spending to make any real concessions. But threatening social security recipients is about as low as one can go. What a scumbag. Especially when it has its own revenue stream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's because he's said as long as Obama's president, there won't be a substantial deal. I tend to agree. Obama's too addicted to spending to make any real concessions. But threatening social security recipients is about as low as one can go. What a scumbag. Especially when it has its own revenue stream.

Have you read the policy analysis yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long can the US keep printing money they don't have. The Republicans don't want to have taxes raised because the the high unemployment but how about raising taxes on the very rich like the millionaires and billionaires who can stand to pay, for the sake of the country. Isn't that better than letting the whole country go down the tubes and the rest of the world with it?

Nope....the rest of the world goes down the tubes all the time without asking the United States! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's pretty slimey of Obama to threathen social security recipients. Social security funds should be seperate from the rest of the budget, see as though only payroll taxes fund it. There's no reason those SS cheques shouldn't go out. Unless he just enjoys being a dick, and playing more politics with people's lives.

Stop it. Stop being so dumb. If the debt limit isn't raised where do you think the money is going to come from to pay the US debts? Magic? There isn't enough money anywhere if you don't make swift cuts to SS and Medicare. That has been the point of this exercise the whole time. It is Obama being honest when he say SS can't go out not mean not under handed. Only someone who knows nothing about the Structure of US finances like you would make a statement as dumb as that.

Even if Obama wanted to send out SS checks with money that doesn't exist, there would be no structure to send them out, process them, etc, because the government would have no capacity to do it. Your statement proves just how delusional Republicans are about this whole process.

Oh BTW Nixon was the one who added SS to the general revenues so don't take it up with Obama you can take that one up with Nixon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you read the policy analysis yet?

If the programs listed on page 13 were lessen by just half a percent each, you could easily fund everything on page 14. The only thing you'd have to halt is federal employee pay, and whatever "other" spending is. I don't see a problem doing that for a month or two if that's the time it takes to put together a proper deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop it. Stop being so dumb. If the debt limit isn't raised where do you think the money is going to come from to pay the US debts? Magic?

The billions of dollars in tax and other revenue that comes into the government on a weekly basis. :rolleyes:

I see you've bought into the hype and demagoguery. Pathetic. Especially social security. It has it's own revenue stream. Payroll taxes! YOu don't need to borrow anything for that! Barack Scumbag Obama's just trying to scare social security recipients. It's more than disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's because he's said as long as Obama's president, there won't be a substantial deal. I tend to agree. Obama's too addicted to spending to make any real concessions. But threatening social security recipients is about as low as one can go. What a scumbag. Especially when it has its own revenue stream.

OMG are you trying to be mislead or do you not know anything. You know what the SS revenue stream is? It is US debt Nixon in 72 passed The State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act which meant the government could borrow against SS. So the "revenue stream" as you call for SS is the US government which wont be able to pay for it if the debt ceiling is not raised. Get a clue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...