Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

It's not about provoking anti-American violence. Don't start moving the goal posts like you're famous for. I simply stated that waterboarding had been successful in obtaining information from terrorists, which had then been used to stop attacks and save lives. That's not even debatable. It's fact. I linked to CNN. That's not a right-wing website. In other words, you have no teeth left.

You didn't say waterboarding had been successful. You said waterboarding "saved lives." And if you're talking about "saving lives", a key factor is whether or not violence is provoked. Because, you know, violence often results in the opposite of "saving lives." That's not moving goalposts---that's acknowledging reality.

And the link I was talking about was not CNN. It was CNSN, which calls itself, right in its banner, "The Right News."

At least they're honest.

And you'll be gumming mush tonight. :lol:

Edited by BubberMiley
"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

You didn't say waterboarding had been successful. You said waterboarding "saved lives." And if you're talking about "saving lives", a key factor is whether or not violence is provoked. Because, you know, violence often results in the opposite of "saving lives." That's not moving goalposts---that's acknowledging reality.

And the link I was talking about was not CNN. It was CNSN, which calls itself, right in its banner, "The Right News."

At least they're honest.

And you'll be gumming mush tonight. :lol:

You've officially jumped the shark!

Waterboarding led to information, which led to the capture of terrorists, and the break up of terrorists plots. If you can't understand how that's saving lives, than you're an even bigger lost cause than I had thought. Waterboarding was used on 3 people. It was stopped in 2005. For you to try and somehow link violence to the waterboarding of 3 terrorist masterminds is completly tenuous at best. Especially since it wasn't made public until somewhat recently.

Anyways, I'm sure you can cite specific examples of violence that resulted from the waterboarding of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. If you can't. Then once agin, stop wasting my time with your nonsense.

Posted

Waterboarding led to information, which led to the capture of terrorists, and the break up of terrorists plots.

Again, the only credible source you provided was the opinion of a guy who opposes waterboarding. In response, I provided a contrary opinion from an equally credible source who also opposes waterboarding. Then you reposted that link and linked to some radical right-wing website with highly questionable anonymous sources. I can see how, once again, you would resort to claims of teeth-kicking, but it's just your typical last desperate measure when you've got nothing left.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

Again, the only credible source you provided was the opinion of a guy who opposes waterboarding. In response, I provided a contrary opinion from an equally credible source who also opposes waterboarding.

Your source didn't dispute the fact that waterboarding has worked, and gathered information that has broken up terrorist plots. Instead, as usual, the goal posts move, and move, and move.

Posted

Instead, as usual, the goal posts move, and move, and move.

That's for sure. Some people are even trying to pass off unsourced right-wing blog journalism as the real thing.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

That's for sure. Some people are even trying to pass off unsourced right-wing blog journalism as the real thing.

Once again, CNN and The Washington Post aren't right-wing blogs. Keep trying. :rolleyes:

Posted

Once again, CNN and The Washington Post aren't right-wing blogs. Keep trying. :rolleyes:

Keeping trying to pretend you didn't link to CNSN. :rolleyes:

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

Keep trying to pretend I didn't also link to CNN and The Washington Post. :rolleyes:

Okay, if we're going for full repetitive redundancy, keep trying to pretend those links gave anything but some guy's opinion. :rolleyes:

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

Okay, if we're going for full repetitive redundancy, keep trying to pretend those links gave anything but some guy's opinion. :rolleyes:

Is'nt repetition redundant by nature?

The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

Posted

Is'nt repetition redundant by nature?

Looks like Jack got ya there Bubbles.

Btw Jack. I'm still waiting for an explaination as to why I'm a sell out. And what exactly I sold out of? Stop running Jack. There's nowhere to run, and nowhere to hide.

Posted (edited)

Indeed...next they will tell us that killing terrorists doesn't save any lives either! LOL!

Don't worry, plenty of a certain ilk don't think killing terrorists saves lives.

Edited by jbg
  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted (edited)

Is'nt repetition redundant by nature?

Some posts are repetitive, reiterative and redundant, as well as perseverative.

Edited by jbg
  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,846
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    beatbot
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Radiorum went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Venandi earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...