A lady just sat down beside me in a full BERKA

[bush_cheney2004]

And you smell like crayons.

That's good...I like the smell of crayons:

http://i465.photobucket.com/albums/rr19/vuskiepoo/crayola-crayons.jpg

[Moonlight Graham]

Okay ...boy does she have nice hands..and those eyes - mystic....love the colour of the robe by the way...okay now for a peek at her screen...here goes......nope - can't do it...my side vision works pretty good though..the hot Berka babe is highly skilled on the computer..Maybe she is a terrorist? A rich one at that...she has about 10 grand in gold on her hands...I forgot - terrorist have to be poor and miserable to be recruited - Or in the alternative a rich spoiled Saudi Arabian who needs a hobby that consists of killing infidels... She just gave out the cutest sneeze....Okay I am going to drop something on the ground and take another peek ...maybe I will drop a pen an oogle her sacred never before seen by a westerner ankels?

God ...her legs ...not that I looked must be those of a tender deer...oh no! If a hot headed Muslim reads this he is going to come gunning for me for even thinking of looking at his hot covered up woman....Her typing skills are a bit slow....CAN'T DO it FOLKS...JUST CAN'T BE RUDE AND GLARE AT HERE PRIVATE COMPUTER WRITINGS...JEZZ .. i AM SUCH A CHICKEN.

This is one of the most hilarious posts ever on this forum, in a good way (i think?). You da man Oleg lol.

[Moonlight Graham]

Why insult crayons ?

What a great thread.

[Wild Bill]

now you're stretching the point Bill, you can't speak for those women telling us how they feel...

we have plenty of christian sects in canada that by your standards and mine as well that we would consider demeaning but they accept it as part of their religious society...

Please, no more "Well, somebody else does it too so it must be ok!" arguments!

If an Islamic sect is fundamentalist enough to put their women in bags then virtually always their women are never asked for their choice! One can also make an argument that their religious upbringing violates their inherent human rights. We already step in as regards polygamous marriage to underage girls in places like Bountiful, B.C. We prosecute honour killings, not allowing religion to be an excuse. we insist that children be given medically necessary operations and blood transfusions.

Raising a female child to have no concept of a free choice as regards living their life in a bag can hardly be equated with life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness or as we somehow believe here in Canada, the overwhelming urge to have good government! B)

As for "stretching things", what can I say? I'm getting to be an old codger! The difference between myself and some others on this board, I KNOW I'm getting to be an old codger!

Edited September 16, 2010 by Wild Bill

[Oleg Bach]

It would be quiet pleasant and highly industrious to honour kill all your sorry asses...but it's illegal. So seeing that I have a minimum of time left in this grand life span - I simply do not want to do the time. As mentioned the other day my youngest son dis-honoured me...well...I could have killed him - in a symbolic way of course - but ...I gave it some thought and felt that he was not worth the bother or the 25 year sentence....Yes I do love the kid..but love has never stopped me from being honourable...or has it ? Twenty seven years of wasted life with that disloyal destructive hag....was most certainly NOT an honour...oh well as I said in a video skit - playing a red neck "If I would have killed her 20 years ago I would be out by now"....

So much for the dark humor...and speaking of dark _ I am sitting at a public computer right next to where the Berka Babe sat...and yes I do smell like crayons this morning...and there is a hint of peaches drifting my way from the chair of the now gone Berka Babe... Mohamid forgive me for what I am about to say in regards to the well packaged and mystically covered woman of my dreams.................BERKA BABE WAS TOTALLY HOT...

Now if I could go back in time I would have insisted my former third wife wear a berka - not to protect her from wandering lustful male eyes but to cover the homely twit so I would not have to look at her plain looks she inherited from her henchman father the drunken cop.

I sometimes wonder what Berka chicks think of when they see a hot guy..that is NOT their husband...I guess they can lick their lips in anticipation and even utter sexy obscenities under their breath and no one will know!

The Berka Babes can swagger and strut and we will assume that all is conservative and proper - seeing the long gown will hide any sexy movement...NOW - I wonder one thing . about the polically defective what's his name who mentioned the crayon smell...Is it that MIKE - had a brother who wore a helmet to bed and love eating orange wax thinking that the flavour was that of real tangerines?

[Oleg Bach]

Please, no more "Well, somebody else does it too so it must be ok!" arguments!

If an Islamic sect is fundamentalist enough to put their women in bags then virtually always their women are never asked for their choice! One can also make an argument that their religious upbringing violates their inherent human rights. We already step in as regards polygamous marriage to underage girls in places like Bountiful, B.C. We prosecute honour killings, not allowing religion to be an excuse. we insist that children be given medically necessary operations and blood transfusions.

Raising a female child to have no concept of a free choice as regards living their life in a bag can hardly be equated with life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness or as we somehow believe here in Canada, the overwhelming urge to have good government! B)

As for "stretching things", what can I say? I'm getting to be an old codger! The difference between myself and some others on this board, I KNOW I'm getting to be an old codger!

YOU are not getting old - YOU are giving up...and taking on the role of an "old codger" - and no one uses the term codger anymore...so give up the term... this bit about "violates their inherent human rights" is silly...their "inherent" rights are NOT our inherent rights - they inherited the Berka and for most of them it is NORMAL - what right have we a stange and foreign culture have to inflict our westernisms on another culture? It would be akin to calling the cops on a neighbour that raises his voice against the kids or wife....and saying that he is abusing them...when the fact might be his family is so effected by our decayed and decadent society that they are hopelessly deaf to reason.

Raising a child that is female - that has "no concept of free choice" ....humm - I wonder what the subtext of that statement is? What about teaching male children to be independent and to have the "freedom of choice"? As we concentrate and focus on feminist eccentric ideas we forget about basic human rights...human rights should not be confined by sex.... also - the issue of children....One of my kids works for "Free The Children" - I often wonder once the kids are free who is going to take possession of them? I also know for a fact if you FREE THE PARENTS...the freedom of the kids will follow...emotionalism is a tool of hypocites...as for the BERKA - none of your god damned buisness...no wonder the Islamics want to destroy you...because you attempt to destroy them....

Time for people who want to control others learn to control themselves first . and in my best Forest Gump...that's all I have to say about that.

[eyeball]

We haven't even mentioned how demeaning it is to women.

In the case of burkas it's not the women who are the problem, it's the men who freak out at the sight of women who are. It's just to bad Mohammad didn't order them to wear blinders.

It's bad enough in our society many men can't or won't make the effort to not check out every woman they look at but burkas make men everywhere look particularly bad.

I think blinders are the way to go. They put a finer point on who's doing all the demeaning.

[guyser]

Please, no more "Well, somebody else does it too so it must be ok!" arguments!

Except to a degree they are valid arguments.

Plenty of "somebody else does it" and since it is not against the law, nor should be, we must allow it.

There are plenty of various dresscodes for religious people and we make no bones about them, sao why single out one, unless of course it is because some dont like that group.

One can also make an argument that their religious upbringing violates their inherent human rights.

You could,b ut I doubt you'd be successful.

Ever been an Italian teen girl? Neither have i, but I knew enough and they were invariably housebound and manner of dress was chosen for them all the time. So ?

We already step in as regards polygamous marriage to underage girls in places like Bountiful, B.C. We prosecute honour killings, not allowing religion to be an excuse. we insist that children be given medically necessary operations and blood transfusions.

Raising a female child to have no concept of a free choice as regards living their life in a bag can hardly be equated with life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness or as we somehow believe here in Canada, the overwhelming urge to have good government! B)

As for "stretching things", what can I say? I'm getting to be an old codger! The difference between myself and some others on this board, I KNOW I'm getting to be an old codger!

drop the getting to be

Of your examples , they constitute violations of criminal law. So kind of a lousy comparison and I think you'll agree.

As for the free choice, education and enlightenment is a strong tool, resorting to criminality is a obvious dumb choice and merely perpetuates what you dont want....free choice.

[dre]

You see Oleg? Thats why there are Burka's. Good thing she's wearing one or you'd have jumped her.

"Burka saves deranged man from rape. News at 11."

[bloodyminded]

I don't particularily care how a woman is dressed...

I'm into the visibility of the proportional curviness of the entire package...

True. The discrete body parts are wonderful, but the whole package together is the real work of art.

[The_Squid]

I have a solution to this "problem".... Personally, I find it mildly offensive when I see someone dressed like this... it has been done by cultures for no other reason than to suppress women. However, given that one group shouldn't be discriminated against I can't condone banning the burka.

Given this, I suggest:

No religious dress in public.

No priestly collars, no nun-suits, no funny little hats and no burkas. The Constitution may have something to say about it, but it certainly isn't discriminatory against any particular religion, but against all of them.

[Oleg Bach]

True. The discrete body parts are wonderful, but the whole package together is the real work of art.

Yes - it is a work of devine art...a berka babe is like a great painting covered in a black sheet to be unvailed. Personally I think that the black bag is sexy....imagine a world where the man belonged fully to the woman and was totally loyal - and in turn the woman was the man's property and totally loyal and loving>>> what's so bad abou that ...now the western extreme jumps a quantum mile from this concept - we have a family law system where strangers take control of woman - man and child...in fact if YOUR wife commits adutlery - YOU have to hand her your money - which she eccepts with her free hand as she is blowing the next door neighbor..so which is more extreme..the berka or our system of being lower than a dog?

[Oleg Bach]

Sometimes you will see the older two hundred pound matriarch in her berka..like a tank she plows forward barking commands in the name of Mohamid...causing all the submissive male Muslims to quiver in their shoes..YES - I have seen that where the "poor subjugated woman' in the black bag moo moo dress is the dominating force and guide of the tribe...I bet some of them are wearing brass knuckles. If a male gets out of hand he might feel the thud of semi precious metal padded by black died cotton up side the head....."ouch mum...it was not me who put the cigarette burn in the prayer rug".

[Oleg Bach]

Seems everyone enjoys the Berka Babe tale..let me see what else I have got. Ever wonder about the berkas that have the see through screen? You know that veil material that lets you see out but know one in. What's the purpose of those as in comparison to the see the eyes kind? Might it be that the person is cross eyed...or maybe they have real god awful ugly eyes? Or is this type of berka eye where the kind that MEN wear if they are a drag queen berka babe? Of course you can tell if a person is ugly or a man or a woman by the EYES! After all they are the window to the soul...oooh that might be it...some don't have souls?

Actually it must be interesting to walk about looking though sheer fabric and getting the visual impression of a 1965 diode tube television..the whole world is in black and white ...much like I see the world these days..now lets see if I can actually be funny...Is it easier to sratch you but wearing a big old berka..does it muffle farts? Maybe they wear a mini bum berka to dampen the rip roaring sound of poorly digested tabouli?

[Oleg Bach]

I have this big beer garden umbrella on my back roof..the fabric is coarse and rigid..when I take it off the frame..and put it over my head it makes the prefect berka..I spent a few minutes running about the house wearing the thing..hoping the son and his buddies would get a laugh out of it...it kind of smelled in there..but looking in the mirror was quite disturbing..to go though most of lifes waking hours not being able to look in the mirror to admire yourself was disempowering...maybe that is the real reason for berkas...

The reason might originally have been NOT to keep others from looking at yourself but to KEEP YOU FROM LOOKING AT YOURSELF...This would bring about a kind of socialism - a facism...perhaps an equality of nothingness....and a loss of holy idenity...If we are in the image of GOD...the mirror image of the maker..and we are denied to look upon the reflection of God..than what the Muslims must be saying is...men are God and woman are not...well to be afraid to look at a well formed ankle on a hot chick...thinking that the temptation will be to much to resist...show that the MEN ARE NOT GOD EITHER>

[Oleg Bach]

In closing..let the woman look upon themselves and let the men be ware that they are nothing "with out a woman or a girl" ...quote from James Browns' MAN's WORLD..... It might be time to free the men from this idea that being torn asunder from their better half via a berka is not a good idea..that it might just be evil to disempower men and woman through this devide..ALL are entitled to look upon the face of God in the end...and all are entitled to look upon the mirror image of GOD in the here and now...TIME FOR THE BERKA TO GO AND FOR MUSLIM MEN TO BEHAVE LIKE MEN.

[Oleg Bach]

I GUESS THAT IS THE TRUTH...IF THE BERKA IS THERE TO ASSIST MEN WHO ARE TOO WEAK TO CONTROL THEIR ANIMAL LUST..THEN MUSLIM MEN ARE RELEGATED TO THE LEVEL OF DUMB ANIMALS THROUGH THEIR RELIGION. A REAL MAN CAN LOOK UPON ANY WOMAN AND NOT HAVE SOME SILLY POWER TAKE THEM OVER THAT DICTATES TO THEM AND SAYS..."I CAN NOT CONTROL MY URGE TO BREED" A MAN MUST BE ABLE TO CONTROL HIMSELVE NO MATTER WHAT THE SO-CALLED

TEMPTATION IS.

FOR INSTANCE TO BLAME EVE THE FIRST WOMAN FOR ALL THE WORLDS SIN IS SILLY...EVE MIGHT HAVE SUGGESTED IT..BUT IT WAS ADAM WHO MADE THE DECISION TO EAT FROM THE TREE OF UNBRIDLED HUMAN IMAGINATION COMMONLY KNOWN AS KNOWLEDGE..

MEN MUST BE MEN...AND WOMB MAN MUST BE WOMAN...BOTH ARE THE SAME ENTITY..TO BLOT ONE HALF OUT CAUSES SORROW..TO BLOT OUT BEAUTY WITH BLACK CLOTH..IT THE ULTIMATE IN UTLITARIANISM VS. BEAUTY.........................BEAUTY IS SUPERIOUR AND SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BE.

THE WORLD CAN BE UGLY ENOUGH WITH OUT GIVING BEAUTY A HANDICAP...................FREEDOM!

[Oleg Bach]

There is a war going on - it is between beauty and utility. Berkas are utilitarian...UGLY...corporatism creates an invisable berka that non-Muslim woman wear...at least the Muslims are honest about being haters of beauty..where as we pretend NOT to hate what is beautiful.