Saipan Posted December 10, 2010 Report Posted December 10, 2010 Confused, methinks the NFA is.... Yes, you think that - even without reading it What rights?....too funny. LOL, not yours. Quote
guyser Posted December 10, 2010 Report Posted December 10, 2010 Yes, you think that - even without reading it I read it and quoted it. You are not aware , due no doubt to ignoraance or stupidity (your choice) but one in this country does not have any right ot a firearm . But my quote from your link says "renewed attack on the rights of responsible firearm owners " meaning they think some people do. Birds of a feather.Stupidity attracts stupidity. LOL, not yours. Nor yours,. however you think so. Thus, my question....What rights are being denied ? Simple and easy. Please answer. Quote
Saipan Posted December 11, 2010 Report Posted December 11, 2010 one in this country does not have any right ot a firearm. Since when? Tell indians on any reserve. But keep your engine running and door open. Quote
guyser Posted December 13, 2010 Report Posted December 13, 2010 Since when? Tell indians on any reserve. But keep your engine running and door open. AGAIN... Thus, my question....What rights are being denied ? Simple and easy. Please answer. Quote
M.Dancer Posted December 13, 2010 Report Posted December 13, 2010 Since when? Since? never.... If you think you can find a legal cite showing that guns (like the US) are subject to a "right" lets have at it.... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Saipan Posted December 13, 2010 Report Posted December 13, 2010 If you think you can find a legal cite showing that guns (like the US) are subject to a "right" lets have at it.... See my previous post. "If you think you can find a legal cite showing that" cars and TV sets "are subject to a "right" lets have at it...." Quote
M.Dancer Posted December 13, 2010 Report Posted December 13, 2010 See my previous post. "If you think you can find a legal cite showing that" cars and TV sets "are subject to a "right" lets have at it...." |Correct. There are no legal rights to own TVs Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
ceejay Posted December 13, 2010 Report Posted December 13, 2010 Well, for starters, it tells police when there is a buildup of weapons. Secondly, the registry helps to solve crime, as can be seen in the Mayerthorpe Incident. the person and the firearm need to be registered guns are not dangerous it is the handlers that need to be watched Quote
M.Dancer Posted December 13, 2010 Report Posted December 13, 2010 Well, for starters, it tells police when there is a buildup of weapons. Secondly, the registry helps to solve crime, as can be seen in the Mayerthorpe Incident. I'm pretty sure it doesn't "tell" the police anything. I doubt there is a mechanism that alerts police to someone stockpiling weapons. Police must make a request... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Saipan Posted December 14, 2010 Report Posted December 14, 2010 Gun collection is often called "stockpiling weapons". It sells "news" to the gullible. As if some criminal could shoot more than one gun Most all the criminal shootings we have here involve handguns - which are (supposedly) registered for almost 80 years. Never mind the fact "weapon" is anything used as such. Not necessarily a firearm. Quote
Saipan Posted December 19, 2010 Report Posted December 19, 2010 "The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it." - - - - John Hay, 1872 Quote
Saipan Posted December 24, 2010 Report Posted December 24, 2010 "When the strong man fully armed guardeth his own court, his goods are in peace." Jesus Christ [Luke 11:21.6] Quote
Saipan Posted December 24, 2010 Report Posted December 24, 2010 "The ideal citizen, of a tyrannical state, is the man or woman who bows in silent obedience in exchange for the status of a well cared for herd animal. Thinking people become the tyrant's greatest enemy." - - - - Claire Wolfe Quote
Saipan Posted December 24, 2010 Report Posted December 24, 2010 Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all of you! Quote
Saipan Posted December 27, 2010 Report Posted December 27, 2010 Shwa knows our laws, so he's about to explain how (each) gun registration works. Quote
Saipan Posted January 5, 2011 Report Posted January 5, 2011 I was thinking of creating more threads on the same subject - a la William Ashley. But then ...... why bother Quote
Shwa Posted January 5, 2011 Report Posted January 5, 2011 Shwa knows our laws, so he's about to explain how (each) gun registration works. Hey, cool Saipan, you were trolling for me in this thread. Thanks! I like guns too, I wish I had more of them. Especially handguns. Guess I should make a New Year resolution ot get my license eh? Then shoot stuff... at the range. Quote
Saipan Posted January 5, 2011 Report Posted January 5, 2011 For (legal) handguns you have to wait - for a long time. In the meantime you better join local gun club. And yes get that PAL licence. Quote
Saipan Posted January 6, 2011 Report Posted January 6, 2011 Long gun registration in Canada Costs Startup: $2 billion ($200 million/year) Operational: $100 million/year Non-Compliance Licencing: 70% Handgun Registration: 70% Long gun Registration: 70% Quote
noahbody Posted January 7, 2011 Report Posted January 7, 2011 Well, for starters, it tells police when there is a buildup of weapons. No it doesn't as can be seen in the Mayerthorpe Incident Secondly, the registry helps to solve crime, as can be seen in the Mayerthorpe Incident. That's a bit of a stretch. Roscoe only had on registered gun and he didn't even use it. Criminals just don't use registered long guns. It would be far more effective to offer $100,000 rewards for info leading to an arrest. Quote
eyeball Posted January 7, 2011 Report Posted January 7, 2011 Criminals just don't use registered long guns. Criminals are only a minuscule fraction of who we really need to be concerned about which is the nearly one million Canadians who are expected to be stricken with dementia over the next couple of decades. Recall it was the act of a demented insane individual that really initiated the debate about gun control. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Saipan Posted January 7, 2011 Report Posted January 7, 2011 Criminals are only a minuscule fraction of who we really need to be concerned about which is the nearly one million Canadians who are expected to be stricken with dementia over the next couple of decades. Yes, we have to beware of old geezers, who can hardly put sentence together, like Chretien, in the government. Never mind the street gangs Quote
Saipan Posted January 10, 2011 Report Posted January 10, 2011 (edited) Doctors vs. Gun Owners (A) The number of physicians in the U.S. is 700,000. (B ) Accidental deaths caused by Physicians per year are 120,000. (C ) Accidental deaths per physician is 0.171 Statistics courtesy of U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services. Now think about this: . (A) The number of gun owners in the U.S. is 80,000,000. (Yes, that's 80 million) (B ) The number of accidental gun deaths per year, all age groups, is 1,500. (C ) The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is .0000188 Statistics courtesy of FBI So, statistically, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous than gun owners. Remember, 'Guns don't kill people, doctors do. FACT: NOT EVERYONE HAS A GUN, BUT Almost everyone has at least one doctor. This means you are over 9,000 times more likely to be killed by a doctor as by a gun owner!!! Please alert your friends to this alarming threat. We must ban doctors before this gets completely out of hand!!!!! Out of concern for the public at large, We withheld the statistics on lawyers for fear the shock would cause people to panic and seek medical attention! Edited January 10, 2011 by Saipan Quote
wyly Posted January 10, 2011 Report Posted January 10, 2011 Doctors vs. Gun Owners (A) The number of physicians in the U.S. is 700,000. (B ) Accidental deaths caused by Physicians per year are 120,000. (C ) Accidental deaths per physician is 0.171 Statistics courtesy of U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services. Now think about this: . (A) The number of gun owners in the U.S. is 80,000,000. (Yes, that's 80 million) (B ) The number of accidental gun deaths per year, all age groups, is 1,500. (C ) The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is .0000188 Statistics courtesy of FBI So, statistically, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous than gun owners. Remember, 'Guns don't kill people, doctors do. FACT: NOT EVERYONE HAS A GUN, BUT Almost everyone has at least one doctor. This means you are over 9,000 times more likely to be killed by a doctor as by a gun owner!!! Please alert your friends to this alarming threat. We must ban doctors before this gets completely out of hand!!!!! Out of concern for the public at large, We withheld the statistics on lawyers for fear the shock would cause people to panic and seek medical attention! what a stupid analogy, medical deaths vs gun deaths you didn't put much thought into it did you, of course not it was a cut n'paste...there over 30,000 gun shot deaths per year in the US and over 200,000 injuries... Quote “Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.